From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vladimir Dergachev Subject: Re: waitforVBlank, how does this even work? Date: Wed, 2 Mar 2005 12:45:54 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: References: <9e473391050301215019081bce@mail.gmail.com> <9e473391050302090926854d95@mail.gmail.com> <9e47339105030209302701e9b5@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: Vladimir Dergachev Mime-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9e47339105030209302701e9b5@mail.gmail.com> Sender: dri-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net Errors-To: dri-devel-admin@lists.sourceforge.net List-Unsubscribe: , List-Id: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Jon Smirl Cc: fbdev , DRI developer's list , esellers@users.sourceforge.net On Wed, 2 Mar 2005, Jon Smirl wrote: > On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 12:15:18 -0500 (EST), Vladimir Dergachev > wrote: >>> I would find it useful if someone came up with a standard kernel space >>> V4L radeon driver instead of the Gatos stuff. >> >> By "standard" you mean "self-contained", right ? > > One that doesn't depend on X being there. > > Can one be build now that just ignores the memory management hooks? Sure, but you would have to give up using X on that card. In fact, Eric Sellers has already written such a module that provides V4L 1 and 2 support (Eric, please correct me if I got anything wrong..) best Vladimir Dergachev > > -- > Jon Smirl > jonsmirl@gmail.com > ------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click --