From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vladimir Dergachev Subject: Re: EGL_MESA_screen_surface proposal Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 23:44:13 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: References: <4236F0A8.4000004@tungstengraphics.com> <9e47339105031507064a68630f@mail.gmail.com> <4236FC79.5000909@tungstengraphics.com> <9e4733910503150828ecf5a1b@mail.gmail.com> <1110904613.9080.62.camel@lnx-1cv4-4-110> <9e47339105031520304154e567@mail.gmail.com> Reply-To: Vladimir Dergachev Mime-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <9e47339105031520304154e567@mail.gmail.com> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xorg-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Errors-To: xorg-bounces@lists.freedesktop.org Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Jon Smirl Cc: fbdev , Michel Danzer , Xserver development , DRI-EGL On Tue, 15 Mar 2005, Jon Smirl wrote: > On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 11:36:53 -0500, Michel Danzer wrote: >> On Tue, 2005-03-15 at 11:28 -0500, Jon Smirl wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 08:17:13 -0700, Brian Paul >>> wrote: >>>> Perhaps the eglShowSurface() and eglScreenMode() functions should be >>>> combined so the new surface and new display mode can be validated >>>> together. That way, the undefined state between setting the new >>>> surface and new mode can be avoided. >> >> Makes sense to me. > > What if I just want to show another surface without changing the mode? > I could still use a combined version and since the mode matches the > mode won't actually get changed? Have a flag that describes what needs to be changed ? best Vladimir Dergachev > > -- > Jon Smirl > jonsmirl@gmail.com > _______________________________________________ > xorg mailing list > xorg@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/xorg >