Linux Framebuffer Layer development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, adaplas@gmail.com,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4 v6] i.MX31: dmaengine and framebuffer drivers
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 22:02:47 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0901052139400.8605@axis700.grange> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e9c3a7c20901051143m37c0d7c0x5779475ddc7c5dc2@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, 5 Jan 2009, Dan Williams wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 10:11 AM, Guennadi Liakhovetski
> <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > This is version 6 of dmaengine and framebuffer drivers for i.MX31.
> >
> 
> Tha drivers/dma/ bits look ok to me minus the new warnings:
> 
> drivers/dma/ipu/ipu_irq.c: In function 'ipu_irq_fn':
> drivers/dma/ipu/ipu_irq.c:328: warning: 'irq' may be used
> uninitialized in this function
> drivers/dma/ipu/ipu_irq.c: In function 'ipu_irq_err':
> drivers/dma/ipu/ipu_irq.c:290: warning: 'irq' may be used
> uninitialized in this function

Wow... with what gcc version? My 4.1.2 correctly recognises, that it 
_doesn't_ get used uninitialised.

> I can take patches 1 and 2 through the async_tx tree, or if you would
> rather, add my Acked-by to those and take 1-4 through the MXC tree.
> I'll be sending the async_tx pull request for 2.6.29 in the next few
> days.

Thanks, great! Don't know what's better, let's see what Sascha says. But 
there's one small problem with the patch 2/4: it breaks compilation on 
i.MX31 if IPU is _not_ set, so, default imx31 configs would break:-( The 
problem is, that I use CONFIG_MX3_IPU_IRQS unconditionally in calculation 
of NR_IRQ. The easiest for me is to fix it in mx31.h like

#ifdef CONFIG_MX3_IPU_IRQS
#define MX3_IPU_IRQS CONFIG_MX3_IPU_IRQS
#else
#define MX3_IPU_IRQS 0
#endif

but that's less than elegant:-) A probably better solution would be to fix 
this in Kconfig, best would be to show

config MX3_IPU_IRQS
	int "..."

if MX3_IPU is set and hide it otherwise, setting to 0... But I don't know 
off hand how to do this properly. Hm, looks like the following works:

config MX3_IPU_IRQS
	int "Number of dynamically mapped interrupts for IPU"
	depends on MX3_IPU
	range 2 137
	default 4
	help
	  Out of 137 interrupt sources on i.MX31 IPU only very few are used.
	  To avoid bloating the irq_desc[] array we allocate a sufficient
	  number of IRQ slots and map them dynamically to specific sources.

config MX3_IPU_IRQS
	int
	default 0
	depends on !MX3_IPU

Would it be considered a proper Kbuild (ab)use?

Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer

  reply	other threads:[~2009-01-05 21:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2008-12-26 17:11 [PATCH 0/4 v6] i.MX31: dmaengine and framebuffer drivers Guennadi Liakhovetski
2008-12-26 17:11 ` [PATCH 1/4 v6] dmaengine: add async_tx_clear_ack() macro Guennadi Liakhovetski
2008-12-26 17:11 ` [PATCH 2/4 v6] i.MX31: Image Processing Unit DMA and IRQ drivers Guennadi Liakhovetski
2008-12-26 17:11 ` [PATCH 3/4 v6] i.MX31: framebuffer driver Guennadi Liakhovetski
2008-12-26 17:11 ` [PATCH 4/4 v6] i.MX31: platform bindings and initialisation for IPU and framebuffer drivers Guennadi Liakhovetski
2009-01-05 19:43 ` [PATCH 0/4 v6] i.MX31: dmaengine " Dan Williams
2009-01-05 21:02   ` Guennadi Liakhovetski [this message]
2009-01-05 21:35     ` Dan Williams
2009-01-16 10:09   ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2009-01-16 17:39     ` Dan Williams
2009-01-06  9:04 ` Sascha Hauer
2009-01-06  9:51   ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2009-01-06 10:19     ` Sascha Hauer
2009-01-06 13:20       ` Hans J. Koch
2009-01-08 11:15         ` [PATCH 2/4 v7] i.MX31: Image Processing Unit DMA and IRQ drivers Guennadi Liakhovetski
2009-01-08 10:50 ` [PATCH 0/4 v6] i.MX31: dmaengine and framebuffer drivers Sascha Hauer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.0901052139400.8605@axis700.grange \
    --to=g.liakhovetski@gmx.de \
    --cc=adaplas@gmail.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.arm.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox