From: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de>
To: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] fbdev: sh-mobile: implement MIPI DSI runtime PM
Date: Fri, 24 Dec 2010 08:28:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1012240919430.12192@axis700.grange> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1012221050400.14483@axis700.grange>
On Fri, 24 Dec 2010, Paul Mundt wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 23, 2010 at 01:08:34AM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > On Thu, 23 Dec 2010, Paul Mundt wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Dec 22, 2010 at 10:52:18AM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> > > > @@ -356,7 +360,9 @@ static int __init sh_mipi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > > > goto emap;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > - mipi->dsit_clk = clk_get(&pdev->dev, "dsit_clk");
> > > > + mipi->dev = &pdev->dev;
> > > > +
> > > > + mipi->dsit_clk = clk_get(NULL, "dsit_clk");
> > >
> > > Why did you drop &pdev->dev from clk_get()?
> >
> > Because that clock is not associated with that device, it sisn't work
> > correctly until now. You also cannot associate it with that device
> > exclusively, because it serves two devices...
> >
> I'm not sure I see what the problem is. If there is no special lookup
> matching this clock to the device pointer then the lookup will resolve to
> whatever generically provides that clock. There is also nothing that
> stops someone from providing the same clock to multiple devices via the
> same lookup string, this is largely what clock lookups are for in the
> first place. Any move away from a device pointer to clk_get() is a step
> in the wrong direction.
That device also has other clocks, so, previously, with the device pointer
but with an unmatching device string I was getting a wrong clock - the one
from the device... So, it is a step in the "right" direction in the sense,
that I am now getting a correct clock. But yes, if I can associate one
clock with several devices, that's even better! I'll try that.
Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
http://www.open-technology.de/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-12-24 8:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-12-22 9:52 [PATCH 1/2] fbdev: sh-mobile: implement MIPI DSI runtime PM support Guennadi Liakhovetski
2010-12-22 23:24 ` Paul Mundt
2010-12-23 0:08 ` [PATCH 1/2] fbdev: sh-mobile: implement MIPI DSI runtime PM Guennadi Liakhovetski
2010-12-24 1:34 ` [PATCH 1/2] fbdev: sh-mobile: implement MIPI DSI runtime PM support Paul Mundt
2010-12-24 8:28 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.64.1012240919430.12192@axis700.grange \
--to=g.liakhovetski@gmx.de \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox