From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
Changcheng Deng <deng.changcheng@zte.com.cn>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>, Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
Johan Hovold <johan@kernel.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Miaoqian Lin <linmq006@gmail.com>,
Peter Jones <pjones@redhat.com>, Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>,
Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp>,
Yizhuo Zhai <yzhai003@ucr.edu>,
Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen@huawei.com>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/5] Fix some race conditions that exists between fbmem and sysfb
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2022 17:17:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <YmLHHCQyN03oAqr0@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220420085303.100654-1-javierm@redhat.com>
On Wed, Apr 20, 2022 at 10:52:58AM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The patches in this series are mostly changes suggested by Daniel Vetter
> to fix some race conditions that exists between the fbdev core (fbmem)
> and sysfb with regard to device registration and removal.
>
> For example, it is currently possible for sysfb to register a platform
> device after a real DRM driver was registered and requested to remove the
> conflicting framebuffers.
>
> A symptom of this issue, was worked around with by commit fb561bf9abde
> ("fbdev: Prevent probing generic drivers if a FB is already registered")
> but that's really a hack and should be reverted.
>
> This series attempt to fix it more properly and revert the mentioned hack.
> That will also unblock a pending patch to not make the num_registered_fb
> variable visible to drivers anymore, since that's internal to fbdev core.
>
> Patch #1 is just a trivial preparatory change.
>
> Patch #2 add sysfb_disable() and sysfb_try_unregister() helpers for fbmem
> to use them.
>
> Patch #3 changes how is dealt with conflicting framebuffers unregistering,
> rather than having a variable to determine if a lock should be take, it
> just drops the lock before unregistering the platform device.
>
> Patch #4 fixes the mentioned race conditions and finally patch #5 is the
> revert patch that was posted by Daniel before but he dropped from his set.
>
> The patches were tested on a rpi4 using different video configurations:
> (simpledrm -> vc4 both builtin, only vc4 builtin, only simpledrm builtin
> and simpledrm builtin with vc4 built as a module).
>
> Best regards,
> Javier
Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-22 15:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-20 8:52 [PATCH v3 0/5] Fix some race conditions that exists between fbmem and sysfb Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-04-20 8:53 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] fbdev: Restart conflicting fb removal loop when unregistering devices Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-04-25 8:27 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-04-25 8:37 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-04-20 8:53 ` [PATCH v3 4/5] fbdev: Fix some race conditions between fbmem and sysfb Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-04-25 8:30 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-04-22 15:17 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2022-04-25 8:54 ` [PATCH v3 0/5] Fix some race conditions that exists " Thomas Zimmermann
2022-04-25 9:15 ` Thomas Zimmermann
2022-04-25 9:49 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
2022-04-29 7:47 ` Daniel Vetter
2022-04-29 8:06 ` Javier Martinez Canillas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=YmLHHCQyN03oAqr0@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=deng.changcheng@zte.com.cn \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=javierm@redhat.com \
--cc=johan@kernel.org \
--cc=linmq006@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=penguin-kernel@i-love.sakura.ne.jp \
--cc=pjones@redhat.com \
--cc=sam@ravnborg.org \
--cc=thunder.leizhen@huawei.com \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
--cc=yzhai003@ucr.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).