From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wr1-f51.google.com (mail-wr1-f51.google.com [209.85.221.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E17082045BF for ; Mon, 17 Mar 2025 17:14:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.51 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742231660; cv=none; b=WTk/gJ81GzzGU0HMu9mTYoO5pNKsKR3qvSeGz45xy2gJ5lcGWGe0dukhz4K1j7iMRpQw9eHhaT6kelERnW/VP4LapGH3GrVcZQRYfmBzCXE0GeiqtBGSDpR1YAW7JASyOKgCWKep2KgvF+zeNeCezVFjC2uZv5zTNzhDE/weyyo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742231660; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+jPeFoGNXioGjBUoxk5UC37tXUcl6Q+Xub93zb2WEnk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=AwQv1PW+TbC7EOCpX19ryLqxGJCkcev3jCCU2tSyDWTImK2FAi0PqVci9Sq91Sc19wpWvRxeu5KTIB6BP08s5nJEzNXFnjxtktnmr6ZuOc4jwIE6cSujBMlIR8jvPN4WHxHzv+o3Xo8M+MdUHOFxRwasVMRMDWzPSfKoG/kCp24= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=riscstar.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=riscstar.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=riscstar-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@riscstar-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b=d6pwUbth; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.221.51 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=riscstar.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=riscstar.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=riscstar-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.i=@riscstar-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.b="d6pwUbth" Received: by mail-wr1-f51.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-39727fe912cso1115596f8f.3 for ; Mon, 17 Mar 2025 10:14:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=riscstar-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1742231657; x=1742836457; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=Gd/helYOE9uVmXuMlkncjSq63BGQQdsjbLjgrGPTsCU=; b=d6pwUbthtNFMt7WXWjtt89OHbij4hXtMwqqxWmIKUzd3LgCAG3//XUWafN2S3dOHi5 N+iiWgjKNWN749kBqMY3lE8SEJ1VLkv1dR4s4ZwHPUob8+YS11O8bsVugew5w/WZk9Cv 3W8RFuYw7Ra0J2r+oMApoIoNpJAJHE1JBpfqhhbU0ug4WejGaPM/6cGehGt5ooN0CoFa Bf7bRg5rHlRAPH2io70o9H4cpufmbUVsc0gc5wNC5377ghQ9ZstDFMo7xIChTqEn/Ng5 0ML5keoFPSlah1VxIHM9R+bui7EbvvK0yXx4X6Pi+EzfHwOi9pf9HVYga3dDf7KADtTl NMzA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1742231657; x=1742836457; h=in-reply-to:content-disposition:mime-version:references:message-id :subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=Gd/helYOE9uVmXuMlkncjSq63BGQQdsjbLjgrGPTsCU=; b=otW9U/vXDNSh3vdU6GYxM4Xlz3NcJNJo7xdMmZqCiOwKFRZgKQupv9pdFlMiMXY35X /CIXw3AKOSVMndZH34iRh8UqRIjSznZnerQlkqswl5IvWaEjugXsnXsZZiHvz76rsviJ RPkaeljQhVlxWq5iPguyLaK58tjqZDWBWEupklEuwCTEDwTLcfcOEUiXl2ZbGZAlKhkg 63rvfRzitXDmN/G/ZJnQQl3P6eba5pJPYhprHDjxDPnbruOZjr89r2wDiUT6NhJac6Oz 7iHI404zNTWPc+WbpfaJ0W6fNOk9mQiAQYrXIClXE5/81PNhXuobdmTgo4Dq7SrT56LE Q4zw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCVua7oPJ1PmLaUnQovDJ8+PPInrPzcb9JZL5p5zs/ZBt8uHyEwOfKJ8u9CTmaB5wT4r34CzgdyI7r/s1w==@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzOvmcc4lk6yQR6kcDZOz86wqK3mZHFxgMS1fuKXBIjHC0s6Nfr EFjlgN7LfKzWB+vQ5SlCA1z2ZzUSiiIwYkiFPWrDUhUKJ9KrP82T+S/uUHSYezI= X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncuvRIgawcNTkSxsWWsULNDgPvtocelA/xkfXhsjAkX45inhjgbOZ/JzRpeGUr8 1CmrNUhsRMZ0ToHQxDKLUoLg8NfLlwM3xJc9uVbVYzo/AlLlIwfjM1VZGW2Mkf0EQ9+w0x9aWX6 Z6vevdrlZWP0JNN7odLGhefa4TDkssFAjZDKQGaJDgIyS9uispH99rcQ/QSpHYm2tj2uqZex1YB s43/JwI+Ri5NHf0Meule2UDIQFAnw00gXlTQPxgCk5m/bUNX44bNcmoQqmYO3BVL/yOg91y9vam 0d/PFqlk9LThH6K3VNoZpYD+Y9UHYEBsWFXl3Hfw3Gxara6gPCmm6vp993Gu2zjwaaOSajJ2eCY bu8osdV34Yi2tFze+Q3alcvkbxL8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEvhbfXifzPVNQRpvuqSbPm83CJxXhCqmpCNZkF+yY+5ZvGojK1oVkGDDRJOqUBKsdKLDhpeQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6000:2a8:b0:391:10c5:d1c6 with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-3996b43e7ffmr584748f8f.2.1742231656991; Mon, 17 Mar 2025 10:14:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from aspen.lan (aztw-34-b2-v4wan-166919-cust780.vm26.cable.virginm.net. [82.37.195.13]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-43d1ffc49adsm110267575e9.24.2025.03.17.10.14.16 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 17 Mar 2025 10:14:16 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 17:14:14 +0000 From: Daniel Thompson To: Thomas Zimmermann Cc: Lee Jones , pavel@ucw.cz, danielt@kernel.org, jingoohan1@gmail.com, deller@gmx.de, simona@ffwll.ch, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 00/11] backlight, lcd, led: Remove fbdev dependencies Message-ID: References: <20250306140947.580324-1-tzimmermann@suse.de> <20250313165151.GE3645863@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 09:42:11AM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > Hi > > Am 13.03.25 um 17:51 schrieb Lee Jones: > > On Thu, 06 Mar 2025, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > > > > > This series removes the remaining dependencies on fbdev from the > > > backlight, lcd and led subsystems. Each depends on fbdev events to > > > track display state. Make fbdev inform each subsystem via a dedicated > > > interface instead. > > > > > > Patches 1 to 3 make fbdev track blank state for each display, so that > > > backlight code doesn't have to. > > > > > > Patches 4 to 6 remove fbdev event handling from backlight code. Patches > > > 7 and 8 remove fbdev event handling from lcd code and patches 9 and 10 > > > do the same for led's backlight trigger. > > > > > > The final patch removes the event constants from fbdev. > > > > > > With the series applied, the three subsystems do no longer depend on > > > fbdev. It's also a clean up for fbdev. Fbdev used to send out a large > > > number of events. That mechanism has been deprecated for some time and > > > converted call to dedicated functions instead. > > > > > > Testing is very welcome, as I don't have the hardware to test this > > > series. > > > > > > v3: > > > - export several symbols > > > - static-inline declare empty placeholders > > > v2: > > > - avoid IS_REACHABLE() in source file (Lee) > > > - simplify several interfaces and helpers > > > - use lock guards > > > - initialize global lists and mutices > > > > > > Thomas Zimmermann (11): > > > fbdev: Rework fb_blank() > > > fbdev: Track display blanking state > > > fbdev: Send old blank state in FB_EVENT_BLANK > > > backlight: Implement fbdev tracking with blank state from event > > > backlight: Move blank-state handling into helper > > > backlight: Replace fb events with a dedicated function call > > > backlight: lcd: Move event handling into helpers > > > backlight: lcd: Replace fb events with a dedicated function call > > > leds: backlight trigger: Move blank-state handling into helper > > > leds: backlight trigger: Replace fb events with a dedicated function > > > call > > > fbdev: Remove constants of unused events > > > > > > drivers/leds/trigger/ledtrig-backlight.c | 48 +++++----- > > > drivers/video/backlight/backlight.c | 93 +++++-------------- > > > drivers/video/backlight/lcd.c | 108 +++++++++-------------- > > > drivers/video/fbdev/core/fb_backlight.c | 12 +++ > > > drivers/video/fbdev/core/fb_info.c | 1 + > > > drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbmem.c | 82 ++++++++++++++--- > > > drivers/video/fbdev/core/fbsysfs.c | 8 +- > > > include/linux/backlight.h | 22 ++--- > > > include/linux/fb.h | 12 +-- > > > include/linux/lcd.h | 21 ++++- > > > include/linux/leds.h | 6 ++ > > > 11 files changed, 205 insertions(+), 208 deletions(-) > > No immediately obvious issues from the LEDs side. > > > > Still needs reviews from Backlight and fbdev. > > I'm confused. Are you not the backlight maintainer? Lee is, yes, but this kind of comment is usually a hint that I've been delinquent in my backlight reviews and records that he hasn't looked at the backlight code yet ;-). I'll get on it tomorrow! Daniel.