From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.19]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D544869D10; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 14:35:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708526124; cv=none; b=Lc1qgNr1W27BwqiiRUElCTDSeRmPa2nFyFrGjmH5ScOw4bBhSUrodeZWytLXYWuxxXK1+vbvovcJZ9ZXWXeLZz4KcHgM80pSCVOBRVRHeAivZIdHvC//DEAqbcrFp8uQ66f+npILxNTMpNYYiS/l87WN9Dakw7T6tSkFtbTT39A= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1708526124; c=relaxed/simple; bh=7kJff6uenqtMcG+oABWOgdnozgZWzTpO/XafjFTGPRU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Cy9hT8JkO+EkXCXjdlPKJsZ0wBReAh/pZesRtgRQs0hnn8DWNSqgykvv4ruAcxvSaosbnO24ESHPyn0qkzBaPtSBSXZz6vFGBZVH9NKCwyvL1xujBC4ALzg6rCjZlw3CDIG4aQWhvgvvzZ8oLThlQdCu5HwP35seQQZqpLdqGHc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.19 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=fail smtp.mailfrom=kernel.org X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10990"; a="2550153" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,175,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="2550153" Received: from fmsmga002.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.26]) by orvoesa111.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Feb 2024 06:35:22 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10990"; a="913315192" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.06,175,1705392000"; d="scan'208";a="913315192" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.54]) by fmsmga002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 21 Feb 2024 06:35:19 -0800 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.97) (envelope-from ) id 1rcngp-00000006N7Q-44Cd; Wed, 21 Feb 2024 16:35:15 +0200 Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2024 16:35:15 +0200 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Thomas Zimmermann Cc: lee@kernel.org, daniel.thompson@linaro.org, jingoohan1@gmail.com, deller@gmx.de, robin@protonic.nl, javierm@redhat.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/10] auxdisplay/ht16k33: Remove struct backlight_ops.check_fb Message-ID: References: <20240221094324.27436-1-tzimmermann@suse.de> <20240221094324.27436-3-tzimmermann@suse.de> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240221094324.27436-3-tzimmermann@suse.de> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 10:41:29AM +0100, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > The driver sets struct fb_info.bl_dev to the correct backlight > device. Thus rely on the backlight core code to match backlight > and framebuffer devices, and remove the extra check_fb function > from struct backlight_ops. check_fb() Acked-by: Andy Shevchenko -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko