2.6.33-rc3 -- Intel 945GME (inteldrmfb) -- Two Tux images displayed

2.6.33-rc3 -- Intel 945GME (inteldrmfb) -- Two Tux images displayed

[Miles Lane]

For a long time I have gotten two pictures of Tux showing up when I
include the Tux display option in my custom kernel builds.  I don't
know how many kernel revisions ago it was when I started noticing
this.  It seems like it might have been early in the 2.6 series
kernels.

dmesg:

Linux agpgart interface v0.103
agpgart-intel 0000:00:00.0: Intel 945GME Chipset
agpgart-intel 0000:00:00.0: detected 7932K stolen memory
agpgart-intel 0000:00:00.0: AGP aperture is 256M @ 0xd0000000
[drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810
i915 0000:00:02.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 16 (level, low) -> IRQ 16
i915 0000:00:02.0: setting latency timer to 64
[drm] set up 7M of stolen space
integrated sync not supported
ACPI: Battery Slot [BAT0] (battery present)
[drm] initialized overlay support
[drm] LVDS-8: set mode 1024x600 27
Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 128x37
fb0: inteldrmfb frame buffer device
registered panic notifier
[drm] Initialized i915 1.6.0 20080730 for 0000:00:02.0 on minor 0

# lspci -vvxxx -s 2.1

00:02.1 Display controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS/GME,
943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03)
	Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device 8340
	Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr-
Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
	Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSELúst >TAbort-
<TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
	Latency: 0
	Region 0: Memory at f7f80000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable) [sizeQ2K]
	Capabilities: [d0] Power Management version 2
		Flags: PMEClk- DSI+ D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA PME(D0-,D1-,D2-,D3hot-,D3cold-)
		Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0 DScale=0 PME-
00: 86 80 a6 27 07 00 90 00 03 00 80 03 00 00 80 00
10: 00 00 f8 f7 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
20: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 43 10 40 83
30: 00 00 00 00 d0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
40: 00 00 00 00 48 00 00 00 09 00 09 71 23 25 4a a1
50: 0e 00 30 00 1b 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 80 7f
60: 00 00 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
70: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
90: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
a0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
b0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
c0: 00 04 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
d0: 01 00 22 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
e0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
f0: 88 40 64 34 10 00 00 00 86 0f 05 00 00 00 00 00

From .config:

# Graphics support
#
CONFIG_AGP=y
CONFIG_AGP_INTEL=y
CONFIG_VGA_ARB=y
CONFIG_DRM=y
CONFIG_DRM_KMS_HELPER=y
CONFIG_DRM_I915=y
CONFIG_DRM_I915_KMS=y
CONFIG_VIDEO_OUTPUT_CONTROL=y
CONFIG_FB=y
CONFIG_FIRMWARE_EDID=y
CONFIG_FB_BOOT_VESA_SUPPORT=y
CONFIG_FB_CFB_FILLRECT=y
CONFIG_FB_CFB_COPYAREA=y
CONFIG_FB_CFB_IMAGEBLIT=y
CONFIG_FB_MODE_HELPERS=y
CONFIG_FB_TILEBLITTING=y

# Frame buffer hardware drivers
#
CONFIG_FB_VESA=y
CONFIG_FB_EFI=y
CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_LCD_SUPPORT=y
CONFIG_LCD_CLASS_DEVICE=y
CONFIG_LCD_PLATFORM=y
CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE=y

# Display device support
#
CONFIG_DISPLAY_SUPPORT=y

# Console display driver support
#
CONFIG_VGA_CONSOLE=y
CONFIG_VGACON_SOFT_SCROLLBACK=y
CONFIG_VGACON_SOFT_SCROLLBACK_SIZE\x128
CONFIG_DUMMY_CONSOLE=y
CONFIG_FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE=y
CONFIG_LOGO=y
CONFIG_LOGO_LINUX_CLUT224=y

Re: 2.6.33-rc3 -- Intel 945GME (inteldrmfb) -- Two Tux images

[James Simmons]

> For a long time I have gotten two pictures of Tux showing up when I
> include the Tux display option in my custom kernel builds.  I don't
> know how many kernel revisions ago it was when I started noticing
> this.  It seems like it might have been early in the 2.6 series
> kernels.
> 
> dmesg:
> 
> Linux agpgart interface v0.103
> agpgart-intel 0000:00:00.0: Intel 945GME Chipset
> agpgart-intel 0000:00:00.0: detected 7932K stolen memory
> agpgart-intel 0000:00:00.0: AGP aperture is 256M @ 0xd0000000
> [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810
> i915 0000:00:02.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 16 (level, low) -> IRQ 16
> i915 0000:00:02.0: setting latency timer to 64
> [drm] set up 7M of stolen space
> integrated sync not supported
> ACPI: Battery Slot [BAT0] (battery present)
> [drm] initialized overlay support
> [drm] LVDS-8: set mode 1024x600 27
> Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 128x37
> fb0: inteldrmfb frame buffer device
> registered panic notifier
> [drm] Initialized i915 1.6.0 20080730 for 0000:00:02.0 on minor 0
> 

> # Graphics support
> #
> CONFIG_AGP=y
> CONFIG_AGP_INTEL=y
> CONFIG_VGA_ARB=y
> CONFIG_DRM=y
> CONFIG_DRM_KMS_HELPER=y
> CONFIG_DRM_I915=y
> CONFIG_DRM_I915_KMS=y
> CONFIG_VIDEO_OUTPUT_CONTROL=y
> CONFIG_FB=y
> CONFIG_FIRMWARE_EDID=y
> CONFIG_FB_BOOT_VESA_SUPPORT=y
> CONFIG_FB_CFB_FILLRECT=y
> CONFIG_FB_CFB_COPYAREA=y
> CONFIG_FB_CFB_IMAGEBLIT=y
> CONFIG_FB_MODE_HELPERS=y
> CONFIG_FB_TILEBLITTING=y
> 
> # Frame buffer hardware drivers
> #
> CONFIG_FB_VESA=y
> CONFIG_FB_EFI=y

Try disabling these two above options.

Re: 2.6.33-rc3 -- Intel 945GME (inteldrmfb) -- Two Tux images

[Miles Lane]

On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 12:37 PM, James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org> wrote:
>
>> For a long time I have gotten two pictures of Tux showing up when I
>> include the Tux display option in my custom kernel builds.  I don't
>> know how many kernel revisions ago it was when I started noticing
>> this.  It seems like it might have been early in the 2.6 series
>> kernels.
>>
[...]
>> # Frame buffer hardware drivers
>> #
>> CONFIG_FB_VESA=y
>> CONFIG_FB_EFI=y
>
> Try disabling these two above options.

Well, that means that I don't get Tux at all.  The point is that only
one copy should be displayed.

      Miles

Re: 2.6.33-rc3 -- Intel 945GME (inteldrmfb) -- Two Tux images

[James Simmons]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 733 bytes --]


> On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 12:37 PM, James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org> wrote:
> >
> >> For a long time I have gotten two pictures of Tux showing up when I
> >> include the Tux display option in my custom kernel builds.  I don't
> >> know how many kernel revisions ago it was when I started noticing
> >> this.  It seems like it might have been early in the 2.6 series
> >> kernels.
> >>
> [...]
> >> # Frame buffer hardware drivers
> >> #
> >> CONFIG_FB_VESA=y
> >> CONFIG_FB_EFI=y
> >
> > Try disabling these two above options.
> 
> Well, that means that I don't get Tux at all.  The point is that only
> one copy should be displayed.

I thought you had KMS enabled?? That provides a fbdev emulation layer.

Re: 2.6.33-rc3 -- Intel 945GME (inteldrmfb) -- Two Tux images

[Miles Lane]

On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 12:48 PM, James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 12:37 PM, James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >> For a long time I have gotten two pictures of Tux showing up when I
>> >> include the Tux display option in my custom kernel builds.  I don't
>> >> know how many kernel revisions ago it was when I started noticing
>> >> this.  It seems like it might have been early in the 2.6 series
>> >> kernels.
>> >>
>> [...]
>> >> # Frame buffer hardware drivers
>> >> #
>> >> CONFIG_FB_VESA=y
>> >> CONFIG_FB_EFI=y
>> >
>> > Try disabling these two above options.

Okay.  I disabled those two options and still get the two Tuxes.  I
gues Bruno's message is correct, and I get two Tuxes because I have an
Atom processor with two cores.

               Miles

Re: 2.6.33-rc3 -- Intel 945GME (inteldrmfb) -- Two Tux images

[Bruno Prémont]

On Wed, 06 January 2010 Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> wrote:
> For a long time I have gotten two pictures of Tux showing up when I
> include the Tux display option in my custom kernel builds.  I don't
> know how many kernel revisions ago it was when I started noticing
> this.  It seems like it might have been early in the 2.6 series
> kernels.

Unless your system has exactly one CPU without hyperthreading and with
exactly one core this is the correct bahavior, one tux per logical CPU.

If you just want a single tux you can run your kernel on a system with
only one logical CPU, boot it with maxcpus=1 or rebuild it with
CONFIG_SMP=n... though in those case you will not be able to benefit
from all of your CPU's resources..

Bruno

> dmesg:
> 
> Linux agpgart interface v0.103
> agpgart-intel 0000:00:00.0: Intel 945GME Chipset
> agpgart-intel 0000:00:00.0: detected 7932K stolen memory
> agpgart-intel 0000:00:00.0: AGP aperture is 256M @ 0xd0000000
> [drm] Initialized drm 1.1.0 20060810
> i915 0000:00:02.0: PCI INT A -> GSI 16 (level, low) -> IRQ 16
> i915 0000:00:02.0: setting latency timer to 64
> [drm] set up 7M of stolen space
> integrated sync not supported
> ACPI: Battery Slot [BAT0] (battery present)
> [drm] initialized overlay support
> [drm] LVDS-8: set mode 1024x600 27
> Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 128x37
> fb0: inteldrmfb frame buffer device
> registered panic notifier
> [drm] Initialized i915 1.6.0 20080730 for 0000:00:02.0 on minor 0
> 
> # lspci -vvxxx -s 2.1
> 
> 00:02.1 Display controller: Intel Corporation Mobile 945GM/GMS/GME,
> 943/940GML Express Integrated Graphics Controller (rev 03)
> 	Subsystem: ASUSTeK Computer Inc. Device 8340
> 	Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop-
> ParErr- Stepping- SERR- FastB2B- DisINTx-
> 	Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B+ ParErr- DEVSELúst >TAbort-
> <TAbort- <MAbort- >SERR- <PERR- INTx-
> 	Latency: 0
> 	Region 0: Memory at f7f80000 (32-bit, non-prefetchable)
> [sizeQ2K] Capabilities: [d0] Power Management version 2
> 		Flags: PMEClk- DSI+ D1- D2- AuxCurrent=0mA
> PME(D0-,D1-,D2-,D3hot-,D3cold-) Status: D0 PME-Enable- DSel=0
> DScale=0 PME- 00: 86 80 a6 27 07 00 90 00 03 00 80 03 00 00 80 00
> 10: 00 00 f8 f7 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> 20: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 43 10 40 83
> 30: 00 00 00 00 d0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> 40: 00 00 00 00 48 00 00 00 09 00 09 71 23 25 4a a1
> 50: 0e 00 30 00 1b 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 80 7f
> 60: 00 00 02 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> 70: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> 80: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> 90: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> a0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> b0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> c0: 00 04 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> d0: 01 00 22 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> e0: 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
> f0: 88 40 64 34 10 00 00 00 86 0f 05 00 00 00 00 00
> 
> From .config:
> 
> # Graphics support
> #
> CONFIG_AGP=y
> CONFIG_AGP_INTEL=y
> CONFIG_VGA_ARB=y
> CONFIG_DRM=y
> CONFIG_DRM_KMS_HELPER=y
> CONFIG_DRM_I915=y
> CONFIG_DRM_I915_KMS=y
> CONFIG_VIDEO_OUTPUT_CONTROL=y
> CONFIG_FB=y
> CONFIG_FIRMWARE_EDID=y
> CONFIG_FB_BOOT_VESA_SUPPORT=y
> CONFIG_FB_CFB_FILLRECT=y
> CONFIG_FB_CFB_COPYAREA=y
> CONFIG_FB_CFB_IMAGEBLIT=y
> CONFIG_FB_MODE_HELPERS=y
> CONFIG_FB_TILEBLITTING=y
> 
> # Frame buffer hardware drivers
> #
> CONFIG_FB_VESA=y
> CONFIG_FB_EFI=y
> CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_LCD_SUPPORT=y
> CONFIG_LCD_CLASS_DEVICE=y
> CONFIG_LCD_PLATFORM=y
> CONFIG_BACKLIGHT_CLASS_DEVICE=y
> 
> # Display device support
> #
> CONFIG_DISPLAY_SUPPORT=y
> 
> # Console display driver support
> #
> CONFIG_VGA_CONSOLE=y
> CONFIG_VGACON_SOFT_SCROLLBACK=y
> CONFIG_VGACON_SOFT_SCROLLBACK_SIZE\x128
> CONFIG_DUMMY_CONSOLE=y
> CONFIG_FRAMEBUFFER_CONSOLE=y
> CONFIG_LOGO=y
> CONFIG_LOGO_LINUX_CLUT224=y

Re: 2.6.33-rc3 -- Intel 945GME (inteldrmfb) -- Two Tux images

[Miles Lane]

On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 12:59 PM, Bruno Prémont
<bonbons@linux-vserver.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 06 January 2010 Miles Lane <miles.lane@gmail.com> wrote:
>> For a long time I have gotten two pictures of Tux showing up when I
>> include the Tux display option in my custom kernel builds.  I don't
>> know how many kernel revisions ago it was when I started noticing
>> this.  It seems like it might have been early in the 2.6 series
>> kernels.
>
> Unless your system has exactly one CPU without hyperthreading and with
> exactly one core this is the correct bahavior, one tux per logical CPU.
>
> If you just want a single tux you can run your kernel on a system with
> only one logical CPU, boot it with maxcpus=1 or rebuild it with
> CONFIG_SMP=n... though in those case you will not be able to benefit
> from all of your CPU's resources..
>
> Bruno

Oh!  Well, that explains it.  That is truly weird functionality.  Is
Tux a de facto
CPU presence indicator?  It doesn't make any sense to me, if so.

         Miles

Re: 2.6.33-rc3 -- Intel 945GME (inteldrmfb) -- Two Tux images

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 12:16 -0500, Miles Lane wrote:
> For a long time I have gotten two pictures of Tux showing up when I
> include the Tux display option in my custom kernel builds. 

Doesn't it show one for each cpu in the system?

Re: 2.6.33-rc3 -- Intel 945GME (inteldrmfb) -- Two Tux images

[Miles Lane]

On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 12:16 -0500, Miles Lane wrote:
>> For a long time I have gotten two pictures of Tux showing up when I
>> include the Tux display option in my custom kernel builds.
>
> Doesn't it show one for each cpu in the system?

Apparently so.  And, why this should be true is beyond me.

Re: 2.6.33-rc3 -- Intel 945GME (inteldrmfb) -- Two Tux images

[Peter Zijlstra]

On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 13:10 -0500, Miles Lane wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 12:16 -0500, Miles Lane wrote:
> >> For a long time I have gotten two pictures of Tux showing up when I
> >> include the Tux display option in my custom kernel builds.
> >
> > Doesn't it show one for each cpu in the system?
> 
> Apparently so.  And, why this should be true is beyond me.

drivers/video/fbmem.c:

int fb_show_logo(struct fb_info *info, int rotate)
{
        int y;

        y = fb_show_logo_line(info, rotate, fb_logo.logo, 0,
                              num_online_cpus());
        y = fb_show_extra_logos(info, y, rotate);

        return y;
}


I guess its just a cute way of showing off how many cpus you've got ;-)

Re: 2.6.33-rc3 -- Intel 945GME (inteldrmfb) -- Two Tux images

[Miles Lane]

On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 12:16 -0500, Miles Lane wrote:
>> For a long time I have gotten two pictures of Tux showing up when I
>> include the Tux display option in my custom kernel builds.
>
> Doesn't it show one for each cpu in the system?

I know this is cosmetic, but could we change this behavior and just
show one Tux on all systems?  As a software tester, this just looks
like a bug.  Alternatively, let's put labels under the Tux images
showing "CPU (N)", "CPU (N+1)", ....

This seems like a much better way to know the state of your CPUs:

# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor	: 0
vendor_id	: GenuineIntel
cpu family	: 6
model		: 28
model name	: Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU N280   @ 1.66GHz
stepping	: 2
cpu MHz		: 1667.000
cache size	: 512 KB
physical id	: 0
siblings	: 2
core id		: 0
cpu cores	: 1
apicid		: 0
initial apicid	: 0
fdiv_bug	: no
hlt_bug		: no
f00f_bug	: no
coma_bug	: no
fpu		: yes
fpu_exception	: yes
cpuid level	: 10
wp		: yes
flags		: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov
pat clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe nx constant_tsc
arch_perfmon pebs bts aperfmperf pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl est tm2
ssse3 xtpr pdcm movbe lahf_lm
bogomips	: 3325.27
clflush size	: 64
cache_alignment	: 64
address sizes	: 32 bits physical, 32 bits virtual
power management:

processor	: 1
vendor_id	: GenuineIntel
cpu family	: 6
model		: 28
model name	: Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU N280   @ 1.66GHz
stepping	: 2
cpu MHz		: 1000.000
cache size	: 512 KB
physical id	: 0
siblings	: 2
core id		: 0
cpu cores	: 1
apicid		: 1
initial apicid	: 1
fdiv_bug	: no
hlt_bug		: no
f00f_bug	: no
coma_bug	: no
fpu		: yes
fpu_exception	: yes
cpuid level	: 10
wp		: yes
flags		: fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov
pat clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe nx constant_tsc
arch_perfmon pebs bts aperfmperf pni dtes64 monitor ds_cpl est tm2
ssse3 xtpr pdcm movbe lahf_lm
bogomips	: 3324.83
clflush size	: 64
cache_alignment	: 64
address sizes	: 32 bits physical, 32 bits virtual
power management:

And:

# dmesg | grep -i cpu
Initializing cgroup subsys cpuset
Initializing cgroup subsys cpu
x86 PAT enabled: cpu 0, old 0x7040600070406, new 0x7010600070106
ACPI: SSDT 7f7aeb40 004F0 (v01  PmRef    CpuPm 00003000 INTL 20051117)
SMP: Allowing 2 CPUs, 0 hotplug CPUs
setup_percpu: NR_CPUS:5 nr_cpumask_bits:5 nr_cpu_ids:2 nr_node_ids:1
PERCPU: Embedded 15 pages/cpu @c6c00000 s39448 r0 d21992 u2097152
pcpu-alloc: s39448 r0 d21992 u2097152 alloc=1*4194304
pcpu-alloc: [0] 0 1
Initializing CPU#0
SLUB: Genslabs\x13, HWalignd, Order=0-3, MinObjects=0, CPUs=2, Nodes=1
RCU-based detection of stalled CPUs is enabled.
CPU 0 irqstacks, hardÆc00000 softÆc01000
Initializing cgroup subsys cpuacct
CPU: Physical Processor ID: 0
CPU: Processor Core ID: 0
mce: CPU supports 5 MCE banks
CPU0: Thermal monitoring enabled (TM2)
CPU0: Intel(R) Atom(TM) CPU N280   @ 1.66GHz stepping 02
CPU 1 irqstacks, hardÆe00000 softÆe01000
Initializing CPU#1
Brought up 2 CPUs
ACPI: SSDT 7f7ae180 001FA (v01  PmRef  Cpu0Ist 00003000 INTL 20051117)
ACPI: SSDT 7f7ae410 00724 (v01  PmRef  Cpu0Cst 00003001 INTL 20051117)
ACPI: SSDT 7f7ae0b0 000CC (v01  PmRef  Cpu1Ist 00003000 INTL 20051117)
ACPI: SSDT 7f7ae380 00085 (v01  PmRef  Cpu1Cst 00003000 INTL 20051117)
HPET: 3 timers in total, 0 timers will be used for per-cpu timer
cpu0(2) debug files 135
cpu1(2) debug files 135
microcode: CPU0 sig=0x106c2, pf=0x4, revision=0x212
microcode: CPU1 sig=0x106c2, pf=0x4, revision=0x212
cpuidle: using governor ladder
cpuidle: using governor menu

Re: 2.6.33-rc3 -- Intel 945GME (inteldrmfb) -- Two Tux images

[Pavel Machek]

On Wed 2010-01-06 13:35:59, Miles Lane wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2010 at 1:07 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 12:16 -0500, Miles Lane wrote:
> >> For a long time I have gotten two pictures of Tux showing up when I
> >> include the Tux display option in my custom kernel builds.
> >
> > Doesn't it show one for each cpu in the system?
> 
> I know this is cosmetic, but could we change this behavior and just
> show one Tux on all systems?  As a software tester, this just looks

Its well-known joke by now. Please keep it.

-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html