From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Scot Doyle Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 01:19:48 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH] fbcon: warn on invalid cursor blink intervals Message-Id: List-Id: References: <1463510464-28124-1-git-send-email-ddaney.cavm@gmail.com> <20160517204912.GA29719@amd> <573DE2D0.1050402@caviumnetworks.com> <573E75CD.6050202@ozlabs.org> <573E9AE5.1020206@ozlabs.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Greg Kroah-Hartman , Tomi Valkeinen , Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard Cc: Jeremy Kerr , Ming Lei , David Daney , Dann Frazier , Peter Hurley , Pavel Machek , Jonathan Liu , Alistair Popple , Jean-Philippe Brucker , "Chintakuntla, Radha" , Jiri Slaby , David Airlie , David Daney , Scot Doyle , fengguang.wu@intel.com, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, Linux Kernel Mailing List , stable On Fri, 20 May 2016, Scot Doyle wrote: > On Fri, 20 May 2016, Jeremy Kerr wrote: > > Hi Ming, > > > > >Then looks there are two fix patches acked & tested: > > > > > > - the patch in this thread > > > - another one "[PATCH] tty: vt: Fix soft lockup in fbcon cursor > > >blink timer." > > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/17/455 > > > > > >So which one will be pushed to linus? > > > > Not that it's my call, but we may want both; the first as a safety > > measure to prevent an invalid cur_blink_jiffies ever being set, and the > > second one to actually fix the initialisation of vc_cur_blink_ms (and > > address the warning introduced by the first). > > Tomi / Greg, > > I'd suggest > - applying "tty: vt: Fix soft lockup in fbcon cursor blink timer." to 4.7 and stable[4.2] > - applying "fbcon: warn on invalid cursor blink intervals" to 4.7 > - ignoring "fbcon: use default if cursor blink interval is not valid" > > Note: the patches don't depend on each other "tty: vt: Fix soft lockup..." should be applied first in order to avoid unnecessary reports due to the log warning in "fbcon: warn on invalid..." > > > I guess we could just go with the latter for stable... > > > > Cheers, > > > > Jeremy