From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Julia Lawall Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 09:26:00 +0000 Subject: Re: omapfb/dss: Delete an error message for a failed memory allocation in three functions Message-Id: List-Id: References: <1511809633.32426.70.camel@perches.com> <1511833514.32426.86.camel@perches.com> <7e7e64cf-dbe5-614a-f1e5-29d7b6cf9297@users.sourceforge.net> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: SF Markus Elfring Cc: linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, LKML , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, "Andrew F. Davis" , Tomi Valkeinen , Joe Perches , Arvind Yadav , linux-omap@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 28 Nov 2017, SF Markus Elfring wrote: > >>>> It seems that I got no responses so far for clarification requests > >>>> according to the documentation in a direction I hoped for. > >>> > >>> That's because you are pretty unresponsive to direction. > >> > >> From which places did you get this impression? > > > > Perhaps from the text that you have written only four lines below. > > All comments are dismissed as "the usual mixture of disagreements and acceptance". > > A mixture will always evolve. > > * Some acceptance might not need further considerations. > > * But the disagreements are remembered differently. > They have got a potential for further improvements in some areas. > > > > If you look at the patches sent by others, who learn from > > the feedback provided to them, > > I am also learning to some degree continuously. > > > > there are not so many responses on the disagreements side. > > How do you think about to look at the details for such an observation? > > > > So the mixture is not usual. > > I find that it can be also a matter of statistics. > > > > Since you send lots of patches on the same issues, > > Yes. - I am trying to fix some implementation details by the means > of source code analysis and corresponding transformation. > The patch count is still growing. > > > > there should be no disagreements at all at this point. > > I got an other impression. The probability for disagreements is increasing > in relation to the number of contributors to which I show change possibilities. No. You should learn from the previous submissions what concerns people have and address them up front. julia > > There are also other open issues remaining which can get another > solution somehow. > > Regards, > Markus > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kernel-janitors" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html >