From: Gu Bowen <gubowen5@huawei.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>, Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
<linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org>, <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
<stable@vger.kernel.org>, Lu Jialin <lujialin4@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2,stable/linux-6.6.y] fbdev: Fix out-of-bounds issue in sys_fillrect()
Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2026 15:45:48 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e835a856-4e2d-42dc-b3ab-79aa341e0783@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2025121715-vindicate-valium-1118@gregkh>
Hi Greg,
On 12/17/2025 5:34 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2025 at 05:45:30PM +0800, Gu Bowen wrote:
>> This issue has already been fixed by commit eabb03293087 ("fbdev:
>> Refactoring the fbcon packed pixel drawing routines") on v6.15-rc1, but it
>> still exists in the stable version.
>
> Why not take the refactoring changes instead? That is almost always the
> proper thing to do, one-off changes are almost always wrong and cause
> extra work in the long-term.
>
> Please try backporting those changes instead please.
>
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
As you've suggested, I understand the preference to keep stable branches
aligned with upstream when possible. However, I find that the
refactoring touches many areas of the codebase that have diverged
between mainline and stable-6.6, resulting in extensive merge conflicts.
In addition, I cannot be certain that backporting 3000+ lines of
refactoring code to a stable branch might introduce unknown risks.
Given the current situation, I have another simpler patch solution that
is easy to maintain, and perhaps it could be merged into the stable branch:
void sys_fillrect(struct fb_info *p, const struct fb_fillrect *rect)
...
while (height--) {
dst += dst_idx >> (ffs(bits) - 1);
+ long dst_offset;
+ dst_offset = (unsigned long)dst - (unsigned long)p->screen_base;
+ if (dst_offset < 0 || dst_offset >= p->fix.smem_len)
+ return;
dst_idx &= (bits - 1);
fill_op32(p, dst, dst_idx, pat, width*bpp, bits);
...
BR,
Guber
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-17 7:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-12-17 9:45 [PATCH v2,stable/linux-6.6.y] fbdev: Fix out-of-bounds issue in sys_fillrect() Gu Bowen
2025-12-17 9:34 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2026-01-17 7:45 ` Gu Bowen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=e835a856-4e2d-42dc-b3ab-79aa341e0783@huawei.com \
--to=gubowen5@huawei.com \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lujialin4@huawei.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox