From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>
Cc: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Antonino Daplas <adaplas@pol.net>, Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
Yihao Han <hanyihao@vivo.com>,
cocci@inria.fr, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] video: au1100fb: Move a variable assignment behind a null pointer check in au1100fb_setmode()
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 13:08:29 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <eebf8c0c-7a6a-405f-aaab-2a8a8c2bd91f@stanley.mountain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ugymllbkcsg22ffgyofvkquh5afbvoyv2nna5udmy3xfhv2rjz@jhgghzldzm4u>
On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 10:19:06AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 07:02:12PM +0100, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> > Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 21:35:36 +0200
> >
> > The address of a data structure member was determined before
> > a corresponding null pointer check in the implementation of
> > the function “au1100fb_setmode”.
> >
> > Thus avoid the risk for undefined behaviour by moving the assignment
> > for the variable “info” behind the null pointer check.
> >
> > This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
> >
> > Fixes: 3b495f2bb749 ("Au1100 FB driver uplift for 2.6.")
> > Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
>
> Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>
>
> Should also get
>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>
> to ensure this is backported to stable.
It's not a bugfix, it's a cleanup. That's not a dereference, it's
just pointer math. It shouldn't have a Fixes tag.
Real bugs where we dereference a pointer and then check for NULL don't
last long in the kernel. Most of the stuff Markus is sending is false
positives like this.
regards,
dan carpenter
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID (diff)
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
To: "Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>
Cc: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@web.de>,
kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org,
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
Antonino Daplas <adaplas@pol.net>, Helge Deller <deller@gmx.de>,
Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
Yihao Han <hanyihao@vivo.com>,
cocci@inria.fr, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] video: au1100fb: Move a variable assignment behind a null pointer check in au1100fb_setmode()
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2025 13:08:29 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <eebf8c0c-7a6a-405f-aaab-2a8a8c2bd91f@stanley.mountain> (raw)
Message-ID: <20250303100829.xLb9PVUrMcktZno7II29vmJFPDppXeJRrhLhFxA42Ew@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ugymllbkcsg22ffgyofvkquh5afbvoyv2nna5udmy3xfhv2rjz@jhgghzldzm4u>
On Mon, Mar 03, 2025 at 10:19:06AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Sun, Mar 02, 2025 at 07:02:12PM +0100, Markus Elfring wrote:
> > From: Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
> > Date: Thu, 13 Apr 2023 21:35:36 +0200
> >
> > The address of a data structure member was determined before
> > a corresponding null pointer check in the implementation of
> > the function “au1100fb_setmode”.
> >
> > Thus avoid the risk for undefined behaviour by moving the assignment
> > for the variable “info” behind the null pointer check
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-03 10:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <40c60719-4bfe-b1a4-ead7-724b84637f55@web.de>
[not found] ` <1a11455f-ab57-dce0-1677-6beb8492a257@web.de>
[not found] ` <86551e6f-d529-1ff6-6ce6-b9669d10e6cb@web.de>
2025-03-02 18:02 ` [PATCH RESEND] video: au1100fb: Move a variable assignment behind a null pointer check in au1100fb_setmode() Markus Elfring
2025-03-03 9:19 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2025-03-03 10:08 ` Dan Carpenter [this message]
2025-03-03 10:08 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-03-03 10:14 ` Dan Carpenter
2025-03-03 10:30 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2025-03-03 10:36 ` Markus Elfring
2025-03-03 10:53 ` [PATCH RESEND] " Dan Carpenter
2025-03-05 12:14 ` Markus Elfring
2025-03-05 17:07 ` Helge Deller
2025-03-05 17:28 ` Markus Elfring
2025-03-08 21:26 ` [PATCH RESEND] " Helge Deller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=eebf8c0c-7a6a-405f-aaab-2a8a8c2bd91f@stanley.mountain \
--to=dan.carpenter@linaro.org \
--cc=Markus.Elfring@web.de \
--cc=adaplas@pol.net \
--cc=cocci@inria.fr \
--cc=deller@gmx.de \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=hanyihao@vivo.com \
--cc=kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
--cc=u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).