From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Miao Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2009 01:05:48 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] enable pxa168 LCD on two platform Message-Id: List-Id: References: <7c34ac520911100011x60a354b0mf2e27e1c5fd0422@mail.gmail.com> <20091111155058.4f8d355e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20091111155058.4f8d355e.akpm@linux-foundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 7:50 AM, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:11:56 +0800 > Jun Nie wrote: > >> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org > > I don't think linux-fbdev@vger.kernel.org exists?  You wanted > linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net ? > >> Subject: [PATCH 0/8] enable pxa168 LCD on two platform >> Date:         Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:11:56 +0800 >> Sender: linux-fbdev-owner@vger.kernel.org >> >> This serial patches add LCD controller SPI support and enable frame >> buffer on two platform. Several small fix are included. >> comments from Eric and Russell are addressed. >> >> >>  arch/arm/configs/pxa168_defconfig       |   86 +++++++++++++++- >>  arch/arm/configs/pxa910_defconfig       |   39 +++++++- >>  arch/arm/mach-mmp/aspenite.c            |  176 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>  arch/arm/mach-mmp/include/mach/pxa168.h |    8 ++ >>  arch/arm/mach-mmp/include/mach/pxa910.h |    8 ++ >>  arch/arm/mach-mmp/pxa168.c              |    3 + >>  arch/arm/mach-mmp/pxa910.c              |    4 + >>  arch/arm/mach-mmp/ttc_dkb.c             |  140 ++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>  drivers/gpio/pca953x.c                  |    1 + >>  drivers/video/pxa168fb.c                |  102 ++++++++++++++++++ >>  drivers/video/pxa168fb.h                |   24 +---- >>  include/video/pxa168fb.h                |   49 ++++++++- >>  12 files changed, 612 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-) > > hm.  So who should review and merge these patches?? > Hi Andrew, I'm looking into this - actually this is the 2nd round, and I'd like this to go through my tree since these are really pretty close to the pxa168/910 stuff if you feel OK. > The patches were wordwrapped by your email client.  I had that all > fixed up but the final patch gets a large number of rejects, perhaps > against the ARM changes in linux-next so I gave up. > Jun, Could you please reply each of your mail with an attachment of the patch you formatted with 'git-format-patch'. My guess is you are using Gmail web interface so there might be wrapping issues.