From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Intel FB pixel clock calculation fix
Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 21:58:05 +0200
Message-ID: <m33avxlkc2.fsf@maximus.localdomain>
References: <m3ir6il3wl.fsf@maximus.localdomain>
	<20070910225221.f0eaf22c.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
	<m3veah75u6.fsf@maximus.localdomain>
	<20071026175143.GB1573@elf.ucw.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Return-path: <linux-kernel-owner+glk-linux-kernel-3=40m.gmane.org-S1756599AbXJZT6V@vger.kernel.org>
In-Reply-To: <20071026175143.GB1573@elf.ucw.cz> (Pavel Machek's message of "Fri, 26 Oct 2007 19:51:43 +0200")
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: <fbdev-devel.lists.sourceforge.net
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, sylvain.meyer@worldonline.fr, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Antonino A. Daplas" <adaplas@pol.net>, linux-fbdev-devel@lists.sourceforge.net

Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> writes:

> On Tue 2007-09-11 14:18:57, Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
>> I think 2.6.22 would be overkill, .23 - not sure.
>
> I don't think this is -stable kind of bug.

Given the timeframe, I can only agree once again :-)
-- 
Krzysztof Halasa