linux-fpga.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Philipp Stanner <pstanner@redhat.com>
To: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>
Cc: alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com, alvaro.karsz@solid-run.com,
	andy@kernel.org,  axboe@kernel.dk, bhelgaas@google.com,
	brgl@bgdev.pl, broonie@kernel.org,  corbet@lwn.net,
	davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, eperezma@redhat.com,
	 hao.wu@intel.com, jasowang@redhat.com, joabreu@synopsys.com,
	kuba@kernel.org,  linus.walleij@linaro.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	 linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	 linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
	mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com,  mdf@kernel.org, mst@redhat.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, pabeni@redhat.com,
	 richardcochran@gmail.com, trix@redhat.com,
	virtualization@lists.linux.dev,  xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com,
	yilun.xu@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] vdap: solidrun: Replace deprecated PCI functions
Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2024 13:14:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <01b1e7d505a2b3e670f1613ce3e6a60efd3449ab.camel@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d35a962d-dc95-4469-867e-95b704cca474@wanadoo.fr>

On Tue, 2024-08-20 at 12:50 +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Le 20/08/2024 à 10:09, Philipp Stanner a écrit :
> > > > @@ -556,33 +556,24 @@ static const struct vdpa_config_ops
> > > > snet_config_ops = {
> > > >    static int psnet_open_pf_bar(struct pci_dev *pdev, struct
> > > > psnet
> > > > *psnet)
> > > >    {
> > > >    	char name[50];
> > > > -	int ret, i, mask = 0;
> > > > +	int i;
> > > > +
> > > > +	snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "psnet[%s]-bars",
> > > > pci_name(pdev));
> > > > +
> > > >    	/* We don't know which BAR will be used to
> > > > communicate..
> > > >    	 * We will map every bar with len > 0.
> > > >    	 *
> > > >    	 * Later, we will discover the BAR and unmap all other
> > > > BARs.
> > > >    	 */
> > > >    	for (i = 0; i < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; i++) {
> > > > -		if (pci_resource_len(pdev, i))
> > > > -			mask |= (1 << i);
> > > > -	}
> > > > -
> > > > -	/* No BAR can be used.. */
> > > > -	if (!mask) {
> > > > -		SNET_ERR(pdev, "Failed to find a PCI BAR\n");
> > > > -		return -ENODEV;
> > > > -	}
> > > > -
> > > > -	snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "psnet[%s]-bars",
> > > > pci_name(pdev));
> > > > -	ret = pcim_iomap_regions(pdev, mask, name);
> > > > -	if (ret) {
> > > > -		SNET_ERR(pdev, "Failed to request and map PCI
> > > > BARs\n");
> > > > -		return ret;
> > > > -	}
> > > > +		if (pci_resource_len(pdev, i)) {
> > > > +			psnet->bars[i] =
> > > > pcim_iomap_region(pdev,
> > > > i, name);
> > > 
> > > Hi,
> > > 
> > > Unrelated to the patch, but is is safe to have 'name' be on the
> > > stack?
> > > 
> > > pcim_iomap_region()
> > > --> __pcim_request_region()
> > > --> __pcim_request_region_range()
> > > --> request_region() or __request_mem_region()
> > > --> __request_region()
> > > --> __request_region_locked()
> > > --> res->name = name;
> > > 
> > > So an address on the stack ends in the 'name' field of a "struct
> > > resource".
> > 
> > Oh oh...
> > 
> > > 
> > > According to a few grep, it looks really unusual.
> > > 
> > > I don't know if it is used, but it looks strange to me.
> > 
> > 
> > I have seen it used in the kernel ringbuffer log when you try to
> > request something that's already owned. I think it's here, right in
> > __request_region_locked():
> > 
> > /*
> >   * mm/hmm.c reserves physical addresses which then
> >   * become unavailable to other users.  Conflicts are
> >   * not expected.  Warn to aid debugging if encountered.
> >   */
> > if (conflict->desc == IORES_DESC_DEVICE_PRIVATE_MEMORY) {
> > 	pr_warn("Unaddressable device %s %pR conflicts with %pR",
> > 		conflict->name, conflict, res);
> > }
> > 
> > 
> > Assuming I interpret the code correctly:
> > The conflicting resource is found when a new caller (e.g. another
> > driver) tries to get the same region. So conflict->name on the
> > original
> > requester's stack is by now gone and you do get UB.
> > 
> > Very unlikely UB, since only rarely drivers race for the same
> > resource,
> > but still UB.
> > 
> > But there's also a few other places. Grep for "conflict->name".
> > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > If it is an issue, it was apparently already there before this
> > > patch.
> > 
> > I think this has to be fixed.
> > 
> > Question would just be whether one wants to fix it locally in this
> > driver, or prevent it from happening globally by making the common
> > infrastructure copy the string.
> > 
> > 
> > P.
> > 
> 
> Not a perfect script, but the below coccinelle script only find this 
> place, so I would +1 only fixing things here only.
> 
> Agree?

Yup, sounds good. Copying the string would cause trouble (GFP flags)
anyways.

I'll provide a fix in v2.

Thanks,
P.

> 
> CJ
> 
> 
> 
> @@
> identifier name;
> expression x;
> constant N;
> @@
> 	char name[N];
> 	...
> (
> *	pcim_iomap_region(..., name, ...);
> > 
> *	pcim_iomap_regions(..., name, ...);
> > 
> *	request_region(..., name, ...);
> > 
> *	x = pcim_iomap_region(..., name, ...);
> > 
> *	x = pcim_iomap_regions(..., name, ...);
> > 
> *	x = request_region(..., name, ...);
> )
> 
> 


  reply	other threads:[~2024-08-20 11:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-08-19 16:51 [PATCH 0/9] PCI: Remove pcim_iounmap_regions() Philipp Stanner
2024-08-19 16:51 ` [PATCH 1/9] PCI: Make pcim_release_region() a public function Philipp Stanner
2024-08-19 23:07   ` Damien Le Moal
2024-08-19 16:51 ` [PATCH 2/9] PCI: Make pcim_iounmap_region() " Philipp Stanner
2024-08-19 23:08   ` Damien Le Moal
2024-08-19 16:51 ` [PATCH 3/9] fpga/dfl-pci.c: Replace deprecated PCI functions Philipp Stanner
2024-08-19 16:51 ` [PATCH 4/9] block: mtip32xx: " Philipp Stanner
2024-08-19 18:04   ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-08-20  7:29     ` Philipp Stanner
2024-08-20 10:28       ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-08-20  7:22   ` Philipp Stanner
2024-08-19 16:51 ` [PATCH 5/9] gpio: " Philipp Stanner
2024-08-19 18:22   ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-08-19 18:39   ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2024-08-19 16:51 ` [PATCH 6/9] ethernet: cavium: " Philipp Stanner
2024-08-19 18:23   ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-08-20  7:40     ` Philipp Stanner
2024-08-20 10:32       ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-08-19 16:51 ` [PATCH 7/9] ethernet: stmicro: Simplify PCI devres usage Philipp Stanner
2024-08-19 18:28   ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-08-20  7:52     ` Philipp Stanner
2024-08-20 10:37       ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-08-20 10:53         ` Philipp Stanner
2024-08-19 16:51 ` [PATCH 8/9] vdap: solidrun: Replace deprecated PCI functions Philipp Stanner
2024-08-19 18:19   ` Christophe JAILLET
2024-08-19 18:34     ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-08-20  8:13       ` Philipp Stanner
2024-08-20 10:35         ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-08-20  8:09     ` Philipp Stanner
2024-08-20 10:50       ` Christophe JAILLET
2024-08-20 11:14         ` Philipp Stanner [this message]
2024-08-19 18:31   ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-08-19 18:36     ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-08-19 16:51 ` [PATCH 9/9] PCI: Remove pcim_iounmap_regions() Philipp Stanner
2024-08-19 18:35   ` Andy Shevchenko
2024-08-19 23:08   ` Damien Le Moal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=01b1e7d505a2b3e670f1613ce3e6a60efd3449ab.camel@redhat.com \
    --to=pstanner@redhat.com \
    --cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
    --cc=alvaro.karsz@solid-run.com \
    --cc=andy@kernel.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
    --cc=hao.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=joabreu@synopsys.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
    --cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
    --cc=mdf@kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
    --cc=trix@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=yilun.xu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).