* Re: [PATCH 00/16] Intel FPGA Device Drivers
[not found] <1490875696-15145-1-git-send-email-hao.wu@intel.com>
@ 2017-03-30 17:17 ` Moritz Fischer
[not found] ` <1490875696-15145-2-git-send-email-hao.wu@intel.com>
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Moritz Fischer @ 2017-03-30 17:17 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wu Hao
Cc: atull, moritz.fischer, linux-fpga, linux-kernel, luwei.kang,
yi.z.zhang
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2116 bytes --]
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 08:08:00PM +0800, Wu Hao wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Here is a patch-series adding drivers for Intel FPGA devices.
>
> The Intel FPGA driver provides interfaces for userspace applications to
> configure, enumerate, open, and access FPGA accelerators on platforms
> equipped with Intel(R) FPGA solutions and enables system level management
> functions such as FPGA partial reconfiguration, power management and
> virtualization.
>
> This patch series only adds the basic functions for FPGA accelerators and
> partial reconfiguration. Patches for more functions, e.g power management
> and virtualization, will be submitted after this series gets reviewed.
>
> Patch 1: add a document for Intel FPGA driver overview, including the HW
> architecture, driver organization, device enumeration, virtualization and
> opens.
>
> Patch 2: introduce a fpga-dev class. It's used in below Intel FPGA PCIe
> device driver, to represent a FPGA device on the system, and all actual
> feature devices should be registered as child nodes of this container
> fpga-dev device.
>
> Patch 3-7: implement Intel FPGA PCIe device driver. It walks through the
> 'Device Feature List' in the PCI Bar, creates the container fpga-dev as
> parent and platform devices as children for the feature devices it found.
>
> Patch 8-11: implement Intel FPGA Management Engine (FME) driver. It's a
> platform driver matching with the FME platform device created by above
> PCIe driver. Sysfs and device file ioctls are exposed as user interfaces
> to allow partial reconfiguration to Accelerated Function Units (AFUs) from
> user space applications.
>
> Patch 12-16: implement Intel FPGA Accelerated Function Unit (AFU) driver.
> It's a platform driver matching with AFU platform device created by above
> PCIe driver. It provides user interfaces to expose the AFU MMIO region,
> map/unmap dma buffer, and control the port which AFU connects to.
This is exciting stuff. It will take some time to review, though. I marked
the patchset as 'In-Review' in patchwork.
Cheers,
Moritz
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 455 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 01/16] docs: fpga: add a document for Intel FPGA driver overview
[not found] ` <20170401111619.GB4804@hao-dev>
@ 2017-04-02 14:41 ` Moritz Fischer
2017-04-03 20:44 ` Alan Tull
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Moritz Fischer @ 2017-04-02 14:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wu Hao
Cc: Alan Tull, matthew.gerlach, Moritz Fischer, linux-fpga,
linux-kernel, luwei.kang, yi.z.zhang, Enno Luebbers,
Xiao Guangrong
On Sat, Apr 01, 2017 at 07:16:19PM +0800, Wu Hao wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 01:38:06PM -0500, Alan Tull wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 1:24 PM, <matthew.gerlach@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, 30 Mar 2017, Wu Hao wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Wu Hao,
> > >
> > > Great documentation. I'm looking forward to diving into the rest of the
> > > patches. Please see my comments inline.
> > >
> > > Matthew Gerlach
> > >
> > >
> > >> Add a document for Intel FPGA driver overview.
> > >>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Enno Luebbers <enno.luebbers@intel.com>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
> > >> Signed-off-by: Wu Hao <hao.wu@intel.com>
> > >> ---
> > >> Documentation/fpga/intel-fpga.txt | 259
> > >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > >> 1 file changed, 259 insertions(+)
> > >> create mode 100644 Documentation/fpga/intel-fpga.txt
> > >>
> > >> diff --git a/Documentation/fpga/intel-fpga.txt
> > >> b/Documentation/fpga/intel-fpga.txt
> > >> new file mode 100644
> > >> index 0000000..9396cea
> > >> --- /dev/null
> > >> +++ b/Documentation/fpga/intel-fpga.txt
> > >> @@ -0,0 +1,259 @@
> > >>
> > >> +===============================================================================
> > >> + Intel FPGA driver Overview
> > >>
> > >> +-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >> + Enno Luebbers <enno.luebbers@intel.com>
> > >> + Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
> > >> + Wu Hao <hao.wu@intel.com>
> > >> +
> > >> +The Intel FPGA driver provides interfaces for userspace applications to
> > >> +configure, enumerate, open, and access FPGA accelerators on platforms
> > >> equipped
> > >> +with Intel(R) FPGA solutions and enables system level management
> > >> functions such
> > >> +as FPGA reconfiguration, power management, and virtualization.
> > >> +
> > >
> > >
> > > From a Linux kernel perspective, I'm not sure this is the best name for
> > > this code. The name gives me the impression that it is a driver for all
> > > Intel FPGAs, but not all Intel FPGAs are connected to the processor over a
> > > PCIe bus. The processor could be directely connected like the Arria10
> > > SOCFPGA. Such a processor could certainly benefit from this accelerator
> > > usage model. In an extreme case, couldn't a processor in the FPGA,
> > > running Linux, also benefit from this accelerator model? Is this code a
> > > "FPGA Accelerator Framework"?
> > >
> > >> +HW Architecture
> > >> +===============
> > >> +From the OS's point of view, the FPGA hardware appears as a regular PCIe
> > >> device.
> > >> +The FPGA device memory is organized using a predefined data structure
> > >> (Device
> > >> +Feature List). Features supported by the particular FPGA device are
> > >> exposed
> > >> +through these data structures, as illustrated below:
> > >> +
> > >> + +-------------------------------+ +-------------+
> > >> + | PF | | VF |
> > >> + +-------------------------------+ +-------------+
> > >> + ^ ^ ^ ^
> > >> + | | | |
> > >> ++-----|------------|---------|--------------|-------+
> > >> +| | | | | |
> > >> +| +-----+ +-------+ +-------+ +-------+ |
> > >> +| | FME | | Port0 | | Port1 | | Port2 | |
> > >> +| +-----+ +-------+ +-------+ +-------+ |
> > >> +| ^ ^ ^ |
> > >> +| | | | |
> > >> +| +-------+ +------+ +-------+ |
> > >> +| | AFU | | AFU | | AFU | |
> > >> +| +-------+ +------+ +-------+ |
> > >> +| |
> > >> +| FPGA PCIe Device |
> > >> ++---------------------------------------------------+
> > >> +
> > >> +The driver supports PCIe SR-IOV to create virtual functions (VFs) which
> > >> can be
> > >> +used to assign individual accelerators to virtual machines .
> > >
> > >
> > > Does this HW Architecture require an Intel FPGA? Couldn't any vendors FPGA
> > > be used as long as it presented itself the PCIe bus the same and contained
> > > an appropriate Device Feature List?
I think this is a good (and important) point. Especially when sysfs
entries & ioctls constituting ABI depend on it.
> > >
> > >> +
> > >> +FME (FPGA Management Engine)
> > >> +============================
> > >> +The FPGA Management Enging performs power and thermal management, error
Enging->Engine
> > >> +reporting, reconfiguration, performance reporting, and other
> > >> infrastructure
> > >> +functions. Each FPGA has one FME, which is always accessed through the
> > >> physical
> > >> +function (PF).
> > >> +
> > >> +User-space applications can acquire exclusive access to the FME using
> > >> open(),
> > >> +and release it using close().
> > >> +
> > >> +The following functions are exposed through ioctls:
> > >> +
> > >> + Get driver API version (FPGA_GET_API_VERSION)
> > >> + Check for extensions (FPGA_CHECK_EXTENSION)
> > >> + Assign port to PF (FPGA_FME_PORT_ASSIGN)
> > >> + Release port from PF (FPGA_FME_PORT_RELEASE)
> > >> + Program bitstream (FPGA_FME_PORT_PR)
> > >> +
> > >> +More functions are exposed through sysfs
> > >> +(/sys/class/fpga/fpga.n/intel-fpga-fme.n/):
> > >> +
> > >> + Read bitstream ID (bitstream_id)
> > >> + Read bitstream metadata (bitstream_metadata)
> > >> + Read number of ports (ports_num)
> > >> + Read socket ID (socket_id)
> > >> + Read performance counters (perf/)
> > >> + Power management (power_mgmt/)
> > >> + Thermal management (thermal_mgmt/)
> > >> + Error reporting (errors/)
> > >> +
> > >> +PORT
> > >> +====
> > >> +A port represents the interface between the static FPGA fabric (the "blue
> > >> +bitstream") and a partially reconfigurable region containing an AFU (the
> > >> "green
> >
> > Is this an fpga bridge but with added features?
>
> Yes, I think so. As you see the fme_pr function in patch 11, related port needs
> to be disabled firstly before fpga_mgr_buf_load for given accelerator.
Can we just extend the bridge to have the additional features, please?
> > >> +bitstream"). It controls the communication from SW to the accelerator and
> > >> +exposes features such as reset and debug.
> > >> +
> > >> +A PCIe device may have several ports and each port can be released from
> > >> PF by
> > >> +FPGA_FME_PORT_RELEASE ioctl on FME, and exposed through a VF via PCIe
> > >> sriov
> > >> +sysfs interface.
> > >> +
> > >> +AFU
> > >> +===
> > >> +An AFU is attached to a port and exposes a 256k MMIO region to be used
> > >> for
> > >> +accelerator-specific control registers.
> > >> +
> > >> +User-space applications can acquire exclusive access to an AFU attached
> > >> to a
> > >> +port by using open() on the port device node, and release it using
> > >> close().
> > >> +
> > >> +The following functions are exposed through ioctls:
> > >> +
> > >> + Get driver API version (FPGA_GET_API_VERSION)
> > >> + Check for extensions (FPGA_CHECK_EXTENSION)
> > >> + Get port info (FPGA_PORT_GET_INFO)
> > >> + Get MMIO region info (FPGA_PORT_GET_REGION_INFO)
> > >> + Map DMA buffer (FPGA_PORT_DMA_MAP)
> > >> + Unmap DMA buffer (FPGA_PORT_DMA_UNMAP)
> > >> + Reset AFU (FPGA_PORT_RESET)
> > >> + Enable UMsg (FPGA_PORT_UMSG_ENABLE)
> > >> + Disable UMsg (FPGA_PORT_UMSG_DISABLE)
> > >> + Set UMsg mode (FPGA_PORT_UMSG_SET_MODE)
> > >> + Set UMsg base address (FPGA_PORT_UMSG_SET_BASE_ADDR)
> > >> +
> > >> +User-space applications can also mmap() accelerator MMIO regions.
> > >> +
> > >> +More functions are exposed through sysfs:
> > >> +(/sys/class/fpga/fpga.n/intel-fpga-port.m/):
> > >> +
> > >> + Read Accelerator GUID (afu_id)
> > >> + Error reporting (errors/)
> > >> +
> > >> +Partial Reconfiguration
> > >> +=======================
> > >> +As mentioned above, accelerators can be reconfigured through partial
> > >> +reconfiguration of a green bitstream file (GBS). The green bitstream must
> > >> have
> > >> +been generated for the exact blue bitstream and targeted reconfigurable
> > >> region
> > >> +(port) of the FPGA; otherwise, the reconfiguration operation will fail
> > >> and
> > >> +possibly cause system instability. This compatibility can be checked by
> > >> +comparing the interface ID noted in the GBS header against the interface
> > >> ID
> > >> +exposed by the FME through sysfs (see above). This check is usually done
> > >> by
> > >> +user-space before calling the reconfiguration IOCTL.
> > >> +
> > >> +FPGA virtualization
> > >> +===================
> > >> +To enable accessing an accelerator from applications running in a VM, the
> > >> +respective AFU's port needs to be assigned to a VF using the following
> > >> steps:
> > >> +
> > >> + a) The PF owns all AFU ports by default. Any port that needs to be
> > >> reassigned
> > >> + to a VF must be released from PF firstly through the
> > >> FPGA_FME_PORT_RELEASE
> > >> + ioctl on the FME device.
> > >> +
> > >> + b) Once N ports are released from PF, then user can use below command to
> > >> + enable SRIOV and VFs. Each VF owns only one Port with AFU.
> > >> +
> > >> + echo N > $PCI_DEVICE_PATH/sriov_numvfs
> > >> +
> > >> + c) Pass through the VFs to VMs
> > >> +
> > >> + d) The AFU under VF is accessiable from applications in VM (using the
> > >> same
> > >> + driver inside the VF).
> > >> +
> > >> +Note the an FME can't be assigned to a VF, thus PR and other management
> > >> +functions are only available via the PF.
> > >> +
> > >> +
> > >> +Driver organization
> > >> +===================
> > >> +
> > >> + +------------------+ +---------+ | +---------+
> > >> + | +-------+ | | | | | |
> > >> + | | FPGA | FME | | AFU | | | AFU |
> > >> + | |Manager| Module | | Module | | | Module |
> > >> + | +-------+ | | | | | |
> > >> + +------------------+ +---------+ | +---------+
> > >> + +-----------------------+ | +-----------------------+
> > >> + | FPGA Container Device | | | FPGA Container Device |
> > >> + +-----------------------+ | +-----------------------+
> > >> + +------------------+ | +------------------+
> > >> + | FPGA PCIE Module | | Virtual | FPGA PCIE Module |
> > >> + +------------------+ Host | Machine +------------------+
> > >> + ------------------------------------ | ------------------------------
> > >> + +---------------+ | +---------------+
> > >> + | PCI PF Device | | | PCI VF Device |
> > >> + +---------------+ | +---------------+
> > >> +
> > >> +The FPGA devices appear as regular PCIe devices; thus, the FPGA PCIe
> > >> device
> > >> +driver is always loaded first once a FPGA PCIE PF or VF device is
> > >> detected. This
> > >> +driver plays an infrastructural role in the driver architecuture. It:
> > >> +
> > >> + a) creates FPGA container device as parent of the feature devices.
> > >> + b) walks through the Device Feature List, which is implemented in
> > >> PCIE
> > >> + device BAR memory, to discover feature devices and their sub
> > >> features
> > >> + and create platform device for them under the container device.
> > >
> > >
> > > I really like the idea of creating platform devices for the sub features. It
> > > is in line with other FPGA use cases. Platform devices are at the heart of
> > > device trees used by processors directly connected FPGAs and processors
> > > inside FPGAs.
> > >
> > >> + c) supports SRIOV.
> > >> + d) introduces the feature device infrastructure, which abstracts
> > >> + operations for sub features and exposes common functions to
> > >> feature
> > >> + device drivers.
> > >> +
> > >> +The FPGA Management Engine (FME) driver is a platform driver which is
> > >> loaded
> > >> +automatically after FME platform device creation from the PCIE driver. It
> > >> +provides the key features for FPGA management, including:
> > >> +
> > >> + a) Power and thermal management, error reporting, performance
> > >> reporting
> > >> + and other infrastructure functions. Users can access these
> > >> functions
> > >> + via sysfs interfaces exposed by FME driver.
> > >> + b) Paritial Reconfiguration. The FME driver registers a FPGA
> > >> Manager
> > >> + during PR sub feature initialization; once it receives an
> > >> + FPGA_FME_PORT_PR ioctl from user, it invokes the common
> > >> interface
> > >> + function from FPGA Manager to complete the partial
> > >> reconfiguration of
> > >> + the bitstream to the given port.
> > >> + c) Port management for virtualization. The FME driver introduces
> > >> two
> > >> + ioctls, FPGA_FME_PORT_RELEASE (releases given port from PF) and
> > >> + FPGA_FME_PORT_ASSIGN (assigns the port back to PF). Once the
> > >> port is
> > >> + released from the PF, it can be assigned to the VF through the
> > >> SRIOV
> > >> + interfaces provided by PCIE driver. (Refer to "FPGA
> > >> virtualization"
> > >> + for more details).
> > >> +
> > >> +Similar to the the FME driver, the FPGA Accelerated Function Unit (AFU)
> > >> driver
> > >> +is probed once the AFU platform device is created. The main function of
> > >> this
> > >> +module is to provide an interface for userspace applications to access
> > >> the
> > >> +individual accelerators, including basic reset control on port, AFU MMIO
> > >> region
> > >> +export, dma buffer mapping service, UMsg notification, and remote debug
> > >> +functions (see above).
> > >> +
> > >> +
> > >> +Device enumeration
> > >> +==================
> > >> +This section introduces how applications enumerate the fpga device from
> > >> +the sysfs hierarchy under /sys/class/fpga.
> > >> +
> > >> +In the example below, two Intel(R) FPGA devices are installed in the
> > >> host. Each
> > >> +fpga device has one FME and two ports (AFUs).
> > >> +
> > >> +For each FPGA device, a device director is created under
> > >> /sys/class/fpga/:
> > >> +
> > >> + /sys/class/fpga/fpga.0
> > >> + /sys/class/fpga/fpga.1
> > >> +
> > >> +The Intel(R) FPGA device driver exposes "intel-fpga-dev" as the FPGA's
> > >> name.
> > >> +Application can retrieve name information via the sysfs interface:
> > >> +
> > >> + /sys/class/fpga/fpga.0/name
> > >> +
> > >> +Each node has one FME and two ports (AFUs) as child devices:
> > >> +
> > >> + /sys/class/fpga/fpga.0/intel-fpga-fme.0
> > >> + /sys/class/fpga/fpga.0/intel-fpga-port.0
> > >> + /sys/class/fpga/fpga.0/intel-fpga-port.1
> > >> +
> > >> + /sys/class/fpga/fpga.1/intel-fpga-fme.1
> > >> + /sys/class/fpga/fpga.1/intel-fpga-port.2
> > >> + /sys/class/fpga/fpga.1/intel-fpga-port.3
> > >> +
> > >> +In general, the FME/AFU sysfs interfaces are named as follows:
> > >> +
> > >> + /sys/class/fpga/<fpga.n>/<intel-fpga-fme.n>/
> > >> + /sys/class/fpga/<fpga.n>/<intel-fpga-port.m>/
> > >> +
> > >> +with 'n' consecutively numbering all FMEs and 'm' consecutively numbering
> > >> all
> > >> +ports.
> > >> +
> > >> +The device nodes used for ioctl() or mmap() can be referenced through:
> > >> +
> > >> + /sys/class/fpga/<fpga.n>/<intel-fpga-port.n>/dev
> > >> + /sys/class/fpga/<fpga.n>/<intel-fpga-fme.n>/dev
> > >> +
> > >> +
> > >> +Open discussions
> > >> +================
> > >> +The current FME driver does not provide user space access to the FME MMIO
> > >> +region, but exposes access through sysfs and ioctls. It also provides an
> > >> FPGA
> > >> +manger interface for partial reconfiguration (PR), but does not make use
> > >> of
> > >> +fpga-regions. User PR requests via the FPGA_FME_PORT_PR ioctl are handled
> > >> inside
> > >> +the FME, and fpga-region depends on device tree which is not used at all.
> > >> There
> > >> +are patches from Alan Tull to separate the device tree specific code and
> > >
> > >
> > > I am currently trying to use those patches in a different driver. They've
> > > compiled cleanly in my out of tree pcie module driver against the 3.10
> > > kernel.
> > > I need to actually write the code to create and register the region, but
> > > Alan's platform driver code should be a good guide for me. Just need to
> > > find the time.
> > >
> > >> +introduce a sysfs interface for PR. We plan to add fpga-regions support
> > >> in the
> > >> +driver once the related patches get merged. Then the FME driver should
> > >> create
> > >> +one fpga-region for each Port/AFU.
> > >
> > >
> > > Does the FME driver create the fpga-region, or is each region described as
> > > an entry in the Device Feature List and therefore created by the code that
> > > enumerates the Device Feature List?
> > >
> > >> --
> > >> 2.7.4
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fpga" in
> > >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > >>
> > >
Cheers,
Moritz
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 01/16] docs: fpga: add a document for Intel FPGA driver overview
2017-04-02 14:41 ` [PATCH 01/16] docs: fpga: add a document for Intel FPGA driver overview Moritz Fischer
@ 2017-04-03 20:44 ` Alan Tull
2017-04-04 5:24 ` Wu Hao
2017-04-04 5:06 ` Wu Hao
2017-04-11 18:02 ` Alan Tull
2 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Alan Tull @ 2017-04-03 20:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Moritz Fischer
Cc: Wu Hao, matthew.gerlach, Moritz Fischer, linux-fpga, linux-kernel,
luwei.kang, yi.z.zhang, Enno Luebbers, Xiao Guangrong
On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 01, 2017 at 07:16:19PM +0800, Wu Hao wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 01:38:06PM -0500, Alan Tull wrote:
>> > On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 1:24 PM, <matthew.gerlach@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, 30 Mar 2017, Wu Hao wrote:
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Hi Wu Hao,
>> > >
>> > > Great documentation. I'm looking forward to diving into the rest of the
>> > > patches. Please see my comments inline.
>> > >
>> > > Matthew Gerlach
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >> Add a document for Intel FPGA driver overview.
>> > >>
>> > >> Signed-off-by: Enno Luebbers <enno.luebbers@intel.com>
>> > >> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
>> > >> Signed-off-by: Wu Hao <hao.wu@intel.com>
>> > >> ---
>> > >> Documentation/fpga/intel-fpga.txt | 259
>> > >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> > >> 1 file changed, 259 insertions(+)
>> > >> create mode 100644 Documentation/fpga/intel-fpga.txt
>> > >>
>> > >> diff --git a/Documentation/fpga/intel-fpga.txt
>> > >> b/Documentation/fpga/intel-fpga.txt
>> > >> new file mode 100644
>> > >> index 0000000..9396cea
>> > >> --- /dev/null
>> > >> +++ b/Documentation/fpga/intel-fpga.txt
>> > >> @@ -0,0 +1,259 @@
>> > >>
>> > >> +===============================================================================
>> > >> + Intel FPGA driver Overview
>> > >>
>> > >> +-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > >> + Enno Luebbers <enno.luebbers@intel.com>
>> > >> + Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
>> > >> + Wu Hao <hao.wu@intel.com>
>> > >> +
>> > >> +The Intel FPGA driver provides interfaces for userspace applications to
>> > >> +configure, enumerate, open, and access FPGA accelerators on platforms
>> > >> equipped
>> > >> +with Intel(R) FPGA solutions and enables system level management
>> > >> functions such
>> > >> +as FPGA reconfiguration, power management, and virtualization.
>> > >> +
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > From a Linux kernel perspective, I'm not sure this is the best name for
>> > > this code. The name gives me the impression that it is a driver for all
>> > > Intel FPGAs, but not all Intel FPGAs are connected to the processor over a
>> > > PCIe bus. The processor could be directely connected like the Arria10
>> > > SOCFPGA. Such a processor could certainly benefit from this accelerator
>> > > usage model. In an extreme case, couldn't a processor in the FPGA,
>> > > running Linux, also benefit from this accelerator model? Is this code a
>> > > "FPGA Accelerator Framework"?
>> > >
>> > >> +HW Architecture
>> > >> +===============
>> > >> +From the OS's point of view, the FPGA hardware appears as a regular PCIe
>> > >> device.
>> > >> +The FPGA device memory is organized using a predefined data structure
>> > >> (Device
>> > >> +Feature List). Features supported by the particular FPGA device are
>> > >> exposed
>> > >> +through these data structures, as illustrated below:
>> > >> +
>> > >> + +-------------------------------+ +-------------+
>> > >> + | PF | | VF |
>> > >> + +-------------------------------+ +-------------+
>> > >> + ^ ^ ^ ^
>> > >> + | | | |
>> > >> ++-----|------------|---------|--------------|-------+
>> > >> +| | | | | |
>> > >> +| +-----+ +-------+ +-------+ +-------+ |
>> > >> +| | FME | | Port0 | | Port1 | | Port2 | |
>> > >> +| +-----+ +-------+ +-------+ +-------+ |
>> > >> +| ^ ^ ^ |
>> > >> +| | | | |
>> > >> +| +-------+ +------+ +-------+ |
>> > >> +| | AFU | | AFU | | AFU | |
>> > >> +| +-------+ +------+ +-------+ |
>> > >> +| |
>> > >> +| FPGA PCIe Device |
>> > >> ++---------------------------------------------------+
>> > >> +
>> > >> +The driver supports PCIe SR-IOV to create virtual functions (VFs) which
>> > >> can be
>> > >> +used to assign individual accelerators to virtual machines .
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Does this HW Architecture require an Intel FPGA? Couldn't any vendors FPGA
>> > > be used as long as it presented itself the PCIe bus the same and contained
>> > > an appropriate Device Feature List?
>
> I think this is a good (and important) point. Especially when sysfs
> entries & ioctls constituting ABI depend on it.
>
>> > >
>> > >> +
>> > >> +FME (FPGA Management Engine)
>> > >> +============================
>> > >> +The FPGA Management Enging performs power and thermal management, error
> Enging->Engine
>> > >> +reporting, reconfiguration, performance reporting, and other
>> > >> infrastructure
>> > >> +functions. Each FPGA has one FME, which is always accessed through the
>> > >> physical
>> > >> +function (PF).
>> > >> +
>> > >> +User-space applications can acquire exclusive access to the FME using
>> > >> open(),
>> > >> +and release it using close().
>> > >> +
>> > >> +The following functions are exposed through ioctls:
>> > >> +
>> > >> + Get driver API version (FPGA_GET_API_VERSION)
>> > >> + Check for extensions (FPGA_CHECK_EXTENSION)
>> > >> + Assign port to PF (FPGA_FME_PORT_ASSIGN)
>> > >> + Release port from PF (FPGA_FME_PORT_RELEASE)
>> > >> + Program bitstream (FPGA_FME_PORT_PR)
>> > >> +
>> > >> +More functions are exposed through sysfs
>> > >> +(/sys/class/fpga/fpga.n/intel-fpga-fme.n/):
>> > >> +
>> > >> + Read bitstream ID (bitstream_id)
>> > >> + Read bitstream metadata (bitstream_metadata)
>> > >> + Read number of ports (ports_num)
>> > >> + Read socket ID (socket_id)
>> > >> + Read performance counters (perf/)
>> > >> + Power management (power_mgmt/)
>> > >> + Thermal management (thermal_mgmt/)
>> > >> + Error reporting (errors/)
>> > >> +
>> > >> +PORT
>> > >> +====
>> > >> +A port represents the interface between the static FPGA fabric (the "blue
>> > >> +bitstream") and a partially reconfigurable region containing an AFU (the
>> > >> "green
>> >
>> > Is this an fpga bridge but with added features?
>>
>> Yes, I think so. As you see the fme_pr function in patch 11, related port needs
>> to be disabled firstly before fpga_mgr_buf_load for given accelerator.
>
> Can we just extend the bridge to have the additional features, please?
OK then this code is taking place of a fpga-region that controls the
bridge (port) and fpga-mgr during fpga programming.
>
>> > >> +bitstream"). It controls the communication from SW to the accelerator and
>> > >> +exposes features such as reset and debug.
>> > >> +
>> > >> +A PCIe device may have several ports and each port can be released from
>> > >> PF by
>> > >> +FPGA_FME_PORT_RELEASE ioctl on FME, and exposed through a VF via PCIe
>> > >> sriov
>> > >> +sysfs interface.
>> > >> +
>> > >> +AFU
>> > >> +===
>> > >> +An AFU is attached to a port and exposes a 256k MMIO region to be used
>> > >> for
>> > >> +accelerator-specific control registers.
>> > >> +
>> > >> +User-space applications can acquire exclusive access to an AFU attached
>> > >> to a
>> > >> +port by using open() on the port device node, and release it using
>> > >> close().
>> > >> +
>> > >> +The following functions are exposed through ioctls:
>> > >> +
>> > >> + Get driver API version (FPGA_GET_API_VERSION)
>> > >> + Check for extensions (FPGA_CHECK_EXTENSION)
>> > >> + Get port info (FPGA_PORT_GET_INFO)
>> > >> + Get MMIO region info (FPGA_PORT_GET_REGION_INFO)
>> > >> + Map DMA buffer (FPGA_PORT_DMA_MAP)
>> > >> + Unmap DMA buffer (FPGA_PORT_DMA_UNMAP)
>> > >> + Reset AFU (FPGA_PORT_RESET)
>> > >> + Enable UMsg (FPGA_PORT_UMSG_ENABLE)
>> > >> + Disable UMsg (FPGA_PORT_UMSG_DISABLE)
>> > >> + Set UMsg mode (FPGA_PORT_UMSG_SET_MODE)
>> > >> + Set UMsg base address (FPGA_PORT_UMSG_SET_BASE_ADDR)
>> > >> +
>> > >> +User-space applications can also mmap() accelerator MMIO regions.
>> > >> +
>> > >> +More functions are exposed through sysfs:
>> > >> +(/sys/class/fpga/fpga.n/intel-fpga-port.m/):
>> > >> +
>> > >> + Read Accelerator GUID (afu_id)
>> > >> + Error reporting (errors/)
>> > >> +
>> > >> +Partial Reconfiguration
>> > >> +=======================
>> > >> +As mentioned above, accelerators can be reconfigured through partial
>> > >> +reconfiguration of a green bitstream file (GBS). The green bitstream must
>> > >> have
>> > >> +been generated for the exact blue bitstream and targeted reconfigurable
>> > >> region
>> > >> +(port) of the FPGA; otherwise, the reconfiguration operation will fail
>> > >> and
>> > >> +possibly cause system instability. This compatibility can be checked by
>> > >> +comparing the interface ID noted in the GBS header against the interface
>> > >> ID
>> > >> +exposed by the FME through sysfs (see above). This check is usually done
>> > >> by
>> > >> +user-space before calling the reconfiguration IOCTL.
>> > >> +
>> > >> +FPGA virtualization
>> > >> +===================
>> > >> +To enable accessing an accelerator from applications running in a VM, the
>> > >> +respective AFU's port needs to be assigned to a VF using the following
>> > >> steps:
>> > >> +
>> > >> + a) The PF owns all AFU ports by default. Any port that needs to be
>> > >> reassigned
>> > >> + to a VF must be released from PF firstly through the
>> > >> FPGA_FME_PORT_RELEASE
>> > >> + ioctl on the FME device.
>> > >> +
>> > >> + b) Once N ports are released from PF, then user can use below command to
>> > >> + enable SRIOV and VFs. Each VF owns only one Port with AFU.
>> > >> +
>> > >> + echo N > $PCI_DEVICE_PATH/sriov_numvfs
>> > >> +
>> > >> + c) Pass through the VFs to VMs
>> > >> +
>> > >> + d) The AFU under VF is accessiable from applications in VM (using the
>> > >> same
>> > >> + driver inside the VF).
>> > >> +
>> > >> +Note the an FME can't be assigned to a VF, thus PR and other management
>> > >> +functions are only available via the PF.
>> > >> +
>> > >> +
>> > >> +Driver organization
>> > >> +===================
>> > >> +
>> > >> + +------------------+ +---------+ | +---------+
>> > >> + | +-------+ | | | | | |
>> > >> + | | FPGA | FME | | AFU | | | AFU |
>> > >> + | |Manager| Module | | Module | | | Module |
>> > >> + | +-------+ | | | | | |
>> > >> + +------------------+ +---------+ | +---------+
>> > >> + +-----------------------+ | +-----------------------+
>> > >> + | FPGA Container Device | | | FPGA Container Device |
>> > >> + +-----------------------+ | +-----------------------+
>> > >> + +------------------+ | +------------------+
>> > >> + | FPGA PCIE Module | | Virtual | FPGA PCIE Module |
>> > >> + +------------------+ Host | Machine +------------------+
>> > >> + ------------------------------------ | ------------------------------
>> > >> + +---------------+ | +---------------+
>> > >> + | PCI PF Device | | | PCI VF Device |
>> > >> + +---------------+ | +---------------+
>> > >> +
>> > >> +The FPGA devices appear as regular PCIe devices; thus, the FPGA PCIe
>> > >> device
>> > >> +driver is always loaded first once a FPGA PCIE PF or VF device is
>> > >> detected. This
>> > >> +driver plays an infrastructural role in the driver architecuture. It:
>> > >> +
>> > >> + a) creates FPGA container device as parent of the feature devices.
>> > >> + b) walks through the Device Feature List, which is implemented in
>> > >> PCIE
>> > >> + device BAR memory, to discover feature devices and their sub
>> > >> features
>> > >> + and create platform device for them under the container device.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > I really like the idea of creating platform devices for the sub features. It
>> > > is in line with other FPGA use cases. Platform devices are at the heart of
>> > > device trees used by processors directly connected FPGAs and processors
>> > > inside FPGAs.
>> > >
>> > >> + c) supports SRIOV.
>> > >> + d) introduces the feature device infrastructure, which abstracts
>> > >> + operations for sub features and exposes common functions to
>> > >> feature
>> > >> + device drivers.
>> > >> +
>> > >> +The FPGA Management Engine (FME) driver is a platform driver which is
>> > >> loaded
>> > >> +automatically after FME platform device creation from the PCIE driver. It
>> > >> +provides the key features for FPGA management, including:
>> > >> +
>> > >> + a) Power and thermal management, error reporting, performance
>> > >> reporting
>> > >> + and other infrastructure functions. Users can access these
>> > >> functions
>> > >> + via sysfs interfaces exposed by FME driver.
>> > >> + b) Paritial Reconfiguration. The FME driver registers a FPGA
>> > >> Manager
>> > >> + during PR sub feature initialization; once it receives an
>> > >> + FPGA_FME_PORT_PR ioctl from user, it invokes the common
>> > >> interface
>> > >> + function from FPGA Manager to complete the partial
>> > >> reconfiguration of
>> > >> + the bitstream to the given port.
>> > >> + c) Port management for virtualization. The FME driver introduces
>> > >> two
>> > >> + ioctls, FPGA_FME_PORT_RELEASE (releases given port from PF) and
>> > >> + FPGA_FME_PORT_ASSIGN (assigns the port back to PF). Once the
>> > >> port is
>> > >> + released from the PF, it can be assigned to the VF through the
>> > >> SRIOV
>> > >> + interfaces provided by PCIE driver. (Refer to "FPGA
>> > >> virtualization"
>> > >> + for more details).
>> > >> +
>> > >> +Similar to the the FME driver, the FPGA Accelerated Function Unit (AFU)
>> > >> driver
>> > >> +is probed once the AFU platform device is created. The main function of
>> > >> this
>> > >> +module is to provide an interface for userspace applications to access
>> > >> the
>> > >> +individual accelerators, including basic reset control on port, AFU MMIO
>> > >> region
>> > >> +export, dma buffer mapping service, UMsg notification, and remote debug
>> > >> +functions (see above).
>> > >> +
>> > >> +
>> > >> +Device enumeration
>> > >> +==================
>> > >> +This section introduces how applications enumerate the fpga device from
>> > >> +the sysfs hierarchy under /sys/class/fpga.
>> > >> +
>> > >> +In the example below, two Intel(R) FPGA devices are installed in the
>> > >> host. Each
>> > >> +fpga device has one FME and two ports (AFUs).
>> > >> +
>> > >> +For each FPGA device, a device director is created under
>> > >> /sys/class/fpga/:
>> > >> +
>> > >> + /sys/class/fpga/fpga.0
>> > >> + /sys/class/fpga/fpga.1
>> > >> +
>> > >> +The Intel(R) FPGA device driver exposes "intel-fpga-dev" as the FPGA's
>> > >> name.
>> > >> +Application can retrieve name information via the sysfs interface:
>> > >> +
>> > >> + /sys/class/fpga/fpga.0/name
>> > >> +
>> > >> +Each node has one FME and two ports (AFUs) as child devices:
>> > >> +
>> > >> + /sys/class/fpga/fpga.0/intel-fpga-fme.0
>> > >> + /sys/class/fpga/fpga.0/intel-fpga-port.0
>> > >> + /sys/class/fpga/fpga.0/intel-fpga-port.1
>> > >> +
>> > >> + /sys/class/fpga/fpga.1/intel-fpga-fme.1
>> > >> + /sys/class/fpga/fpga.1/intel-fpga-port.2
>> > >> + /sys/class/fpga/fpga.1/intel-fpga-port.3
>> > >> +
>> > >> +In general, the FME/AFU sysfs interfaces are named as follows:
>> > >> +
>> > >> + /sys/class/fpga/<fpga.n>/<intel-fpga-fme.n>/
>> > >> + /sys/class/fpga/<fpga.n>/<intel-fpga-port.m>/
>> > >> +
>> > >> +with 'n' consecutively numbering all FMEs and 'm' consecutively numbering
>> > >> all
>> > >> +ports.
>> > >> +
>> > >> +The device nodes used for ioctl() or mmap() can be referenced through:
>> > >> +
>> > >> + /sys/class/fpga/<fpga.n>/<intel-fpga-port.n>/dev
>> > >> + /sys/class/fpga/<fpga.n>/<intel-fpga-fme.n>/dev
>> > >> +
>> > >> +
>> > >> +Open discussions
>> > >> +================
>> > >> +The current FME driver does not provide user space access to the FME MMIO
>> > >> +region, but exposes access through sysfs and ioctls. It also provides an
>> > >> FPGA
>> > >> +manger interface for partial reconfiguration (PR), but does not make use
>> > >> of
>> > >> +fpga-regions. User PR requests via the FPGA_FME_PORT_PR ioctl are handled
>> > >> inside
>> > >> +the FME, and fpga-region depends on device tree which is not used at all.
>> > >> There
>> > >> +are patches from Alan Tull to separate the device tree specific code and
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > I am currently trying to use those patches in a different driver. They've
>> > > compiled cleanly in my out of tree pcie module driver against the 3.10
>> > > kernel.
>> > > I need to actually write the code to create and register the region, but
>> > > Alan's platform driver code should be a good guide for me. Just need to
>> > > find the time.
>> > >
>> > >> +introduce a sysfs interface for PR. We plan to add fpga-regions support
>> > >> in the
>> > >> +driver once the related patches get merged. Then the FME driver should
>> > >> create
>> > >> +one fpga-region for each Port/AFU.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Does the FME driver create the fpga-region, or is each region described as
>> > > an entry in the Device Feature List and therefore created by the code that
>> > > enumerates the Device Feature List?
>> > >
>> > >> --
>> > >> 2.7.4
>> > >>
>> > >> --
>> > >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fpga" in
>> > >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> > >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>> > >>
>> > >
>
> Cheers,
> Moritz
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 03/16] fpga: intel: add FPGA PCIe device driver
[not found] ` <1490875696-15145-4-git-send-email-hao.wu@intel.com>
@ 2017-04-04 2:10 ` Moritz Fischer
2017-04-05 13:14 ` Wu, Hao
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Moritz Fischer @ 2017-04-04 2:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wu Hao
Cc: atull, moritz.fischer, linux-fpga, linux-kernel, luwei.kang,
yi.z.zhang, Tim Whisonant, Enno Luebbers, Shiva Rao,
Christopher Rauer, Xiao Guangrong
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 9777 bytes --]
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 08:08:03PM +0800, Wu Hao wrote:
> From: Zhang Yi <yi.z.zhang@intel.com>
>
> The Intel FPGA device appears as a PCIe device on the system. This patch
> implements the basic framework of the driver for Intel PCIe device which
> locates between CPU and Accelerated Function Units (AFUs).
>
> Signed-off-by: Tim Whisonant <tim.whisonant@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Enno Luebbers <enno.luebbers@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shiva Rao <shiva.rao@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Christopher Rauer <christopher.rauer@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.z.zhang@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wu Hao <hao.wu@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/fpga/Kconfig | 2 +
> drivers/fpga/Makefile | 3 +
> drivers/fpga/intel/Kconfig | 27 +++++++++
> drivers/fpga/intel/LICENSE.BSD | 24 ++++++++
> drivers/fpga/intel/Makefile | 3 +
> drivers/fpga/intel/pcie.c | 129 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 6 files changed, 188 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 drivers/fpga/intel/Kconfig
> create mode 100644 drivers/fpga/intel/LICENSE.BSD
> create mode 100644 drivers/fpga/intel/Makefile
> create mode 100644 drivers/fpga/intel/pcie.c
>
> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/Kconfig b/drivers/fpga/Kconfig
> index d99b640..4e49aee 100644
> --- a/drivers/fpga/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/fpga/Kconfig
> @@ -69,6 +69,8 @@ config ALTERA_FREEZE_BRIDGE
> isolate one region of the FPGA from the busses while that
> region is being reprogrammed.
>
> +source "drivers/fpga/intel/Kconfig"
> +
> endif # FPGA
>
> endmenu
> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/Makefile b/drivers/fpga/Makefile
> index 53a41d2..46f1a5d 100644
> --- a/drivers/fpga/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/fpga/Makefile
> @@ -20,3 +20,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_ALTERA_FREEZE_BRIDGE) += altera-freeze-bridge.o
>
> # High Level Interfaces
> obj-$(CONFIG_FPGA_REGION) += fpga-region.o
> +
> +# Intel FPGA Support
> +obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_FPGA) += intel/
> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/intel/Kconfig b/drivers/fpga/intel/Kconfig
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..bf402f3
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/fpga/intel/Kconfig
> @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
> +menuconfig INTEL_FPGA
> + tristate "Intel(R) FPGA support"
> + depends on FPGA_DEVICE
> + help
> + Select this option to enable driver support for Intel(R)
> + Field-Programmable Gate Array (FPGA) solutions. This driver
> + provides interfaces for userspace applications to configure,
> + enumerate, open, and access FPGA accelerators on platforms
> + equipped with Intel(R) FPGA solutions and enables system
> + level management functions such as FPGA reconfiguration,
> + power management, and virtualization.
> +
> + Say Y if your platform has this technology. Say N if unsure.
> +
> +if INTEL_FPGA
> +
> +config INTEL_FPGA_PCI
> + tristate "Intel FPGA PCIe Driver"
> + depends on PCI
> + help
> + This is the driver for the PCIe device which locates between
> + CPU and Accelerated Function Units (AFUs) and allows them to
> + communicate with each other.
> +
> + To compile this as a module, choose M here.
> +
> +endif
> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/intel/LICENSE.BSD b/drivers/fpga/intel/LICENSE.BSD
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..309d2b7
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/fpga/intel/LICENSE.BSD
> @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
> +Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
> +modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions
> +are met:
> + * Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright
> + notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
> + * Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright
> + notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in
> + the documentation and/or other materials provided with the
> + distribution.
> + * Neither the name of Intel Corporation nor the names of its
> + contributors may be used to endorse or promote products derived
> + from this software without specific prior written permission.
> +
> +THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS
> +"AS IS" AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT
> +LIMITED TO, THE IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR
> +A PARTICULAR PURPOSE ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT
> +OWNER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL,
> +SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT
> +LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE,
> +DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY
> +THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT
> +(INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE) ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE
> +OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/intel/Makefile b/drivers/fpga/intel/Makefile
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..61fd8ea
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/fpga/intel/Makefile
> @@ -0,0 +1,3 @@
> +obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_FPGA_PCI) += intel-fpga-pci.o
> +
> +intel-fpga-pci-objs := pcie.o
> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/intel/pcie.c b/drivers/fpga/intel/pcie.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..132d9da
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/fpga/intel/pcie.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,129 @@
> +/*
> + * Driver for Intel FPGA PCIe device
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2017 Intel Corporation, Inc.
> + *
> + * Authors:
> + * Zhang Yi <Yi.Z.Zhang@intel.com>
> + * Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
> + * Joseph Grecco <joe.grecco@intel.com>
> + * Enno Luebbers <enno.luebbers@intel.com>
> + * Tim Whisonant <tim.whisonant@intel.com>
> + * Ananda Ravuri <ananda.ravuri@intel.com>
> + * Henry Mitchel <henry.mitchel@intel.com>
> + *
> + * This work is licensed under a dual BSD/GPLv2 license. When using or
> + * redistributing this file, you may do so under either license. See the
> + * LICENSE.BSD file under this directory for the BSD license and see
> + * the COPYING file in the top-level directory for the GPLv2 license.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/pci.h>
> +#include <linux/types.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/stddef.h>
> +#include <linux/errno.h>
> +#include <linux/aer.h>
> +
> +#define DRV_VERSION "EXPERIMENTAL VERSION"
Is that a leftover? :)
> +#define DRV_NAME "intel-fpga-pci"
> +
> +/* PCI Device ID */
> +#define PCIe_DEVICE_ID_PF_INT_5_X 0xBCBD
> +#define PCIe_DEVICE_ID_PF_INT_6_X 0xBCC0
> +#define PCIe_DEVICE_ID_PF_DSC_1_X 0x09C4
> +/* VF Device */
> +#define PCIe_DEVICE_ID_VF_INT_5_X 0xBCBF
> +#define PCIe_DEVICE_ID_VF_INT_6_X 0xBCC1
> +#define PCIe_DEVICE_ID_VF_DSC_1_X 0x09C5
> +
> +static struct pci_device_id cci_pcie_id_tbl[] = {
> + {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCIe_DEVICE_ID_PF_INT_5_X),},
> + {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCIe_DEVICE_ID_VF_INT_5_X),},
> + {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCIe_DEVICE_ID_PF_INT_6_X),},
> + {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCIe_DEVICE_ID_VF_INT_6_X),},
> + {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCIe_DEVICE_ID_PF_DSC_1_X),},
> + {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCIe_DEVICE_ID_VF_DSC_1_X),},
> + {0,}
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, cci_pcie_id_tbl);
> +
> +static
> +int cci_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pcidev, const struct pci_device_id *pcidevid)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = pci_enable_device(pcidev);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> + dev_err(&pcidev->dev, "Failed to enable device %d.\n", ret);
> + goto exit;
Why not 'return ret' here ?
> + }
> +
> + ret = pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting(pcidev);
> + if (ret && ret != -EINVAL)
> + dev_info(&pcidev->dev, "PCIE AER unavailable %d.\n", ret);
What if it is EINVAL?
> +
> + ret = pci_request_regions(pcidev, DRV_NAME);
> + if (ret) {
> + dev_err(&pcidev->dev, "Failed to request regions.\n");
> + goto disable_error_report_exit;
> + }
> +
> + pci_set_master(pcidev);
> + pci_save_state(pcidev);
> +
> + if (!dma_set_mask(&pcidev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64))) {
> + dma_set_coherent_mask(&pcidev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64));
> + } else if (!dma_set_mask(&pcidev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32))) {
> + dma_set_coherent_mask(&pcidev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
> + } else {
> + ret = -EIO;
> + dev_err(&pcidev->dev, "No suitable DMA support available.\n");
> + goto release_region_exit;
> + }
> +
> + /* TODO: create and add the platform device per feature list */
> + return 0;
> +
> +release_region_exit:
> + pci_release_regions(pcidev);
> +disable_error_report_exit:
> + pci_disable_pcie_error_reporting(pcidev);
> + pci_disable_device(pcidev);
> +exit:
> + return ret;
If you return as suggested above, this can go away.
> +}
> +
> +static void cci_pci_remove(struct pci_dev *pcidev)
> +{
> + pci_release_regions(pcidev);
> + pci_disable_pcie_error_reporting(pcidev);
> + pci_disable_device(pcidev);
> +}
> +
> +static struct pci_driver cci_pci_driver = {
> + .name = DRV_NAME,
> + .id_table = cci_pcie_id_tbl,
> + .probe = cci_pci_probe,
> + .remove = cci_pci_remove,
> +};
> +
> +static int __init ccidrv_init(void)
> +{
> + pr_info("Intel(R) FPGA PCIe Driver: Version %s\n", DRV_VERSION);
> +
> + return pci_register_driver(&cci_pci_driver);
> +}
> +
> +static void __exit ccidrv_exit(void)
> +{
> + pci_unregister_driver(&cci_pci_driver);
> +}
> +
> +module_init(ccidrv_init);
> +module_exit(ccidrv_exit);
> +
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Intel FPGA PCIe Device Driver");
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Intel Corporation");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("Dual BSD/GPL");
> --
> 2.7.4
>
Cheers,
Moritz
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 455 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 04/16] fpga: intel: pcie: parse feature list and create platform device for features.
[not found] ` <1490875696-15145-5-git-send-email-hao.wu@intel.com>
@ 2017-04-04 2:44 ` Moritz Fischer
2017-04-05 12:57 ` Wu Hao
0 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Moritz Fischer @ 2017-04-04 2:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Wu Hao
Cc: atull, moritz.fischer, linux-fpga, linux-kernel, luwei.kang,
yi.z.zhang, Xiao Guangrong, Tim Whisonant, Enno Luebbers,
Shiva Rao, Christopher Rauer
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 42346 bytes --]
Xiao,
few nits inline, I'll need to come back to this once I went over the
rest of the patchset ;-)
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 08:08:04PM +0800, Wu Hao wrote:
> From: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
>
> Device Featuer List structure creates a link list of feature headers
> within the MMIO space to provide an extensiable way of adding features.
>
> The Intel FPGA PCIe driver walks through the feature headers to enumerate
> feature devices, FPGA Management Engine (FME) and FPGA Port for Accelerated
> Function Unit (AFU), and their private sub features. For feature devices,
> it creates the platform devices and linked the private sub features into
> their platform data.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tim Whisonant <tim.whisonant@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Enno Luebbers <enno.luebbers@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Shiva Rao <shiva.rao@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Christopher Rauer <christopher.rauer@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kang Luwei <luwei.kang@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.z.zhang@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Wu Hao <hao.wu@intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/fpga/intel/Makefile | 2 +-
> drivers/fpga/intel/feature-dev.c | 139 +++++++
> drivers/fpga/intel/feature-dev.h | 342 ++++++++++++++++
> drivers/fpga/intel/pcie.c | 841 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 4 files changed, 1321 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/fpga/intel/feature-dev.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/fpga/intel/feature-dev.h
>
> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/intel/Makefile b/drivers/fpga/intel/Makefile
> index 61fd8ea..c029940 100644
> --- a/drivers/fpga/intel/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/fpga/intel/Makefile
> @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
> obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_FPGA_PCI) += intel-fpga-pci.o
>
> -intel-fpga-pci-objs := pcie.o
> +intel-fpga-pci-objs := pcie.o feature-dev.o
> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/intel/feature-dev.c b/drivers/fpga/intel/feature-dev.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..6952566
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/fpga/intel/feature-dev.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,139 @@
> +/*
> + * Intel FPGA Feature Device Driver
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2017 Intel Corporation, Inc.
> + *
> + * Authors:
> + * Kang Luwei <luwei.kang@intel.com>
> + * Zhang Yi <yi.z.zhang@intel.com>
> + * Wu Hao <hao.wu@intel.com>
> + * Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
> + *
> + * This work is licensed under a dual BSD/GPLv2 license. When using or
> + * redistributing this file, you may do so under either license. See the
> + * LICENSE.BSD file under this directory for the BSD license and see
> + * the COPYING file in the top-level directory for the GPLv2 license.
> + */
> +
> +#include "feature-dev.h"
> +
> +void feature_platform_data_add(struct feature_platform_data *pdata,
> + int index, const char *name,
> + int resource_index, void __iomem *ioaddr)
> +{
> + WARN_ON(index >= pdata->num);
> +
> + pdata->features[index].name = name;
> + pdata->features[index].resource_index = resource_index;
> + pdata->features[index].ioaddr = ioaddr;
> +}
> +
> +int feature_platform_data_size(int num)
static inline? num can be const
> +{
> + return sizeof(struct feature_platform_data) +
> + num * sizeof(struct feature);
> +}
> +
> +struct feature_platform_data *
> +feature_platform_data_alloc_and_init(struct platform_device *dev, int num)
> +{
> + struct feature_platform_data *pdata;
> +
> + pdata = kzalloc(feature_platform_data_size(num), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (pdata) {
> + pdata->dev = dev;
> + pdata->num = num;
> + mutex_init(&pdata->lock);
> + }
> +
> + return pdata;
> +}
> +
> +int fme_feature_num(void)
is this used outside of this file? if not -> static
> +{
> + return FME_FEATURE_ID_MAX;
> +}
> +
> +int port_feature_num(void)
is this used outside of this file? if not -> static
> +{
> + return PORT_FEATURE_ID_MAX;
> +}
> +
> +int fpga_port_id(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct feature_port_header *port_hdr;
> + struct feature_port_capability capability;
> +
> + port_hdr = get_feature_ioaddr_by_index(&pdev->dev,
> + PORT_FEATURE_ID_HEADER);
> + WARN_ON(!port_hdr);
> +
> + capability.csr = readq(&port_hdr->capability);
> + return capability.port_number;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fpga_port_id);
> +
> +/*
> + * Enable Port by clear the port soft reset bit, which is set by default.
> + * The User AFU is unable to respond to any MMIO access while in reset.
> + * __fpga_port_enable function should only be used after __fpga_port_disable
> + * function.
> + */
> +void __fpga_port_enable(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct feature_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
> + struct feature_port_header *port_hdr;
> + struct feature_port_control control;
> +
> + WARN_ON(!pdata->disable_count);
> +
> + if (--pdata->disable_count != 0)
> + return;
> +
> + port_hdr = get_feature_ioaddr_by_index(&pdev->dev,
> + PORT_FEATURE_ID_HEADER);
> + WARN_ON(!port_hdr);
> +
> + control.csr = readq(&port_hdr->control);
> + control.port_sftrst = 0x0;
> + writeq(control.csr, &port_hdr->control);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__fpga_port_enable);
> +
> +#define RST_POLL_INVL 10 /* us */
> +#define RST_POLL_TIMEOUT 1000 /* us */
> +
> +int __fpga_port_disable(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct feature_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
> + struct feature_port_header *port_hdr;
> + struct feature_port_control control;
> +
> + if (pdata->disable_count++ != 0)
> + return 0;
> +
> + port_hdr = get_feature_ioaddr_by_index(&pdev->dev,
> + PORT_FEATURE_ID_HEADER);
> + WARN_ON(!port_hdr);
> +
> + /* Set port soft reset */
> + control.csr = readq(&port_hdr->control);
> + control.port_sftrst = 0x1;
> + writeq(control.csr, &port_hdr->control);
> +
> + /*
> + * HW sets ack bit to 1 when all outstanding requests have been drained
> + * on this port and minimum soft reset pulse width has elapsed.
> + * Driver polls port_soft_reset_ack to determine if reset done by HW.
> + */
> + control.port_sftrst_ack = 1;
> +
> + if (fpga_wait_register_field(port_sftrst_ack, control,
> + &port_hdr->control, RST_POLL_TIMEOUT, RST_POLL_INVL)) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "timeout, fail to reset device\n");
> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> + }
see iopoll comment above.
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__fpga_port_disable);
> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/intel/feature-dev.h b/drivers/fpga/intel/feature-dev.h
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..a1e6e7d
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/fpga/intel/feature-dev.h
> @@ -0,0 +1,342 @@
> +/*
> + * Intel FPGA Feature Device Driver Header File
> + *
> + * Copyright (C) 2017 Intel Corporation, Inc.
> + *
> + * Authors:
> + * Kang Luwei <luwei.kang@intel.com>
> + * Zhang Yi <yi.z.zhang@intel.com>
> + * Wu Hao <hao.wu@intel.com>
> + * Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
> + *
> + * This work is licensed under a dual BSD/GPLv2 license. When using or
> + * redistributing this file, you may do so under either license. See the
> + * LICENSE.BSD file under this directory for the BSD license and see
> + * the COPYING file in the top-level directory for the GPLv2 license.
> + */
> +
> +#ifndef __INTEL_FPGA_FEATURE_H
> +#define __INTEL_FPGA_FEATURE_H
> +
> +#include <linux/fs.h>
> +#include <linux/pci.h>
> +#include <linux/uuid.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> +
> +/* maximum supported number of ports */
> +#define MAX_FPGA_PORT_NUM 4
> +/* plus one for fme device */
> +#define MAX_FEATURE_DEV_NUM (MAX_FPGA_PORT_NUM + 1)
> +
> +#define FME_FEATURE_HEADER "fme_hdr"
> +#define FME_FEATURE_THERMAL_MGMT "fme_thermal"
> +#define FME_FEATURE_POWER_MGMT "fme_power"
> +#define FME_FEATURE_GLOBAL_PERF "fme_gperf"
> +#define FME_FEATURE_GLOBAL_ERR "fme_error"
> +#define FME_FEATURE_PR_MGMT "fme_pr"
> +
> +#define PORT_FEATURE_HEADER "port_hdr"
> +#define PORT_FEATURE_UAFU "port_uafu"
> +#define PORT_FEATURE_ERR "port_err"
> +#define PORT_FEATURE_UMSG "port_umsg"
> +#define PORT_FEATURE_PR "port_pr"
> +#define PORT_FEATURE_STP "port_stp"
> +
> +/* All headers and structures must be byte-packed to match the spec. */
> +#pragma pack(1)
I recall there being some controversy about this, can't remember which
way people ended up deciding :)
> +
> +/* common header for all features */
> +struct feature_header {
> + union {
> + u64 csr;
> + struct {
> + u16 id:12;
> + u8 revision:4;
> + u32 next_header_offset:24; /* offset to next header */
> + u32 rsvdz:20;
> + u8 type:4; /* feature type */
> +#define FEATURE_TYPE_AFU 0x1
> +#define FEATURE_TYPE_PRIVATE 0x3
> + };
> + };
> +};
> +
> +/* common header for non-private features */
> +struct feature_afu_header {
> + uuid_le guid;
> + union {
> + u64 csr;
> + struct {
> + u64 next_afu:24; /* pointer to next afu header */
> + u64 rsvdz:40;
> + };
> + };
> +};
> +
> +/* FME Header Register Set */
> +/* FME Capability Register */
> +struct feature_fme_capability {
> + union {
> + u64 csr;
> + struct {
> + u8 fabric_verid; /* Fabric version ID */
> + u8 socket_id:1; /* Socket id */
> + u8 rsvdz1:3;
> + u8 pcie0_link_avl:1; /* PCIe0 link availability */
> + u8 pcie1_link_avl:1; /* PCIe1 link availability */
> + u8 coherent_link_avl:1;/* Coherent link availability */
> + u8 rsvdz2:1;
> + u8 iommu_support:1; /* IOMMU or VT-d supported */
> + u8 num_ports:3; /* Num of ports implemented */
> + u8 rsvdz3:4;
> + u8 addr_width_bits:6; /* Address width supported */
> + u8 rsvdz4:2;
> + u16 cache_size:12; /* Cache size in kb */
> + u8 cache_assoc:4; /* Cache Associativity */
> + u16 rsvdz5:15;
> + u8 lock_bit:1; /* Latched lock bit by BIOS */
> + };
> + };
> +};
> +
> +/* FME Port Offset Register */
> +struct feature_fme_port {
> + union {
> + u64 csr;
> + struct {
> + u32 port_offset:24; /* Offset to port header */
> + u8 rsvdz1;
> + u8 port_bar:3; /* Bar id */
> + u32 rsvdz2:20;
> + u8 afu_access_ctrl:1; /* AFU access type: PF/VF */
> + u8 rsvdz3:4;
> + u8 port_implemented:1; /* Port implemented or not */
> + u8 rsvdz4:3;
> + };
> + };
> +};
> +
> +struct feature_fme_header {
> + struct feature_header header;
> + struct feature_afu_header afu_header;
> + u64 rsvd[2];
> + struct feature_fme_capability capability;
> + struct feature_fme_port port[MAX_FPGA_PORT_NUM];
> +};
> +
> +/* FME Thermal Sub Feature Register Set */
> +struct feature_fme_thermal {
> + struct feature_header header;
> +};
> +
> +/* FME Power Sub Feature Register Set */
> +struct feature_fme_power {
> + struct feature_header header;
> +};
> +
> +/* FME Global Performance Sub Feature Register Set */
> +struct feature_fme_gperf {
> + struct feature_header header;
> +};
> +
> +/* FME Error Sub Feature Register Set */
> +struct feature_fme_err {
> + struct feature_header header;
> +};
> +
> +/* FME Partial Reconfiguration Sub Feature Register Set */
> +struct feature_fme_pr {
> + struct feature_header header;
> +};
> +
> +/* PORT Header Register Set */
> +/* Port Capability Register */
> +struct feature_port_capability {
> + union {
> + u64 csr;
> + struct {
> + u8 port_number:2; /* Port Number 0-3 */
> + u8 rsvdz1:6;
> + u16 mmio_size; /* User MMIO size in KB */
> + u8 rsvdz2;
> + u8 sp_intr_num:4; /* Supported interrupts num */
> + u32 rsvdz3:28;
> + };
> + };
> +};
> +
> +/* Port Control Register */
> +struct feature_port_control {
> + union {
> + u64 csr;
> + struct {
> + u8 port_sftrst:1; /* Port Soft Reset */
> + u8 rsvdz1:1;
> + u8 latency_tolerance:1;/* '1' >= 40us, '0' < 40us */
> + u8 rsvdz2:1;
> + u8 port_sftrst_ack:1; /* HW ACK for Soft Reset */
> + u64 rsvdz3:59;
> + };
> + };
> +};
> +
> +struct feature_port_header {
> + struct feature_header header;
> + struct feature_afu_header afu_header;
> + u64 rsvd[2];
> + struct feature_port_capability capability;
> + struct feature_port_control control;
> +};
> +
> +/* PORT Error Sub Feature Register Set */
> +struct feature_port_error {
> + struct feature_header header;
> +};
> +
> +/* PORT Unordered Message Sub Feature Register Set */
> +struct feature_port_umsg {
> + struct feature_header header;
> +};
> +
> +/* PORT SignalTap Sub Feature Register Set */
> +struct feature_port_stp {
> + struct feature_header header;
> +};
> +
> +#pragma pack()
> +
> +struct feature {
> + const char *name;
> + int resource_index;
> + void __iomem *ioaddr;
> +};
> +
> +struct feature_platform_data {
> + /* list the feature dev to cci_drvdata->port_dev_list. */
> + struct list_head node;
> + struct mutex lock;
> + struct platform_device *dev;
> + unsigned int disable_count; /* count for port disable */
> +
> + int num; /* number of features */
> + struct feature features[0];
> +};
> +
> +enum fme_feature_id {
> + FME_FEATURE_ID_HEADER = 0x0,
> + FME_FEATURE_ID_THERMAL_MGMT = 0x1,
> + FME_FEATURE_ID_POWER_MGMT = 0x2,
> + FME_FEATURE_ID_GLOBAL_PERF = 0x3,
> + FME_FEATURE_ID_GLOBAL_ERR = 0x4,
> + FME_FEATURE_ID_PR_MGMT = 0x5,
> + FME_FEATURE_ID_MAX = 0x6,
> +};
> +
> +enum port_feature_id {
> + PORT_FEATURE_ID_HEADER = 0x0,
> + PORT_FEATURE_ID_ERROR = 0x1,
> + PORT_FEATURE_ID_UMSG = 0x2,
> + PORT_FEATURE_ID_PR = 0x3,
> + PORT_FEATURE_ID_STP = 0x4,
> + PORT_FEATURE_ID_UAFU = 0x5,
> + PORT_FEATURE_ID_MAX = 0x6,
> +};
> +
> +int fme_feature_num(void);
> +int port_feature_num(void);
> +
> +#define FPGA_FEATURE_DEV_FME "intel-fpga-fme"
> +#define FPGA_FEATURE_DEV_PORT "intel-fpga-port"
> +
> +void feature_platform_data_add(struct feature_platform_data *pdata,
> + int index, const char *name,
> + int resource_index, void __iomem *ioaddr);
> +int feature_platform_data_size(int num);
> +struct feature_platform_data *
> +feature_platform_data_alloc_and_init(struct platform_device *dev, int num);
> +
> +int fpga_port_id(struct platform_device *pdev);
> +
> +static inline int fpga_port_check_id(struct platform_device *pdev,
> + void *pport_id)
> +{
> + return fpga_port_id(pdev) == *(int *)pport_id;
> +}
> +
> +void __fpga_port_enable(struct platform_device *pdev);
> +int __fpga_port_disable(struct platform_device *pdev);
> +
> +static inline void fpga_port_enable(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct feature_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
> +
> + mutex_lock(&pdata->lock);
> + __fpga_port_enable(pdev);
> + mutex_unlock(&pdata->lock);
> +}
> +
> +static inline int fpga_port_disable(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct feature_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
> + int ret;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&pdata->lock);
> + ret = __fpga_port_disable(pdev);
> + mutex_unlock(&pdata->lock);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int __fpga_port_reset(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = __fpga_port_disable(pdev);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + __fpga_port_enable(pdev);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline int fpga_port_reset(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + struct feature_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
> + int ret;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&pdata->lock);
> + ret = __fpga_port_reset(pdev);
> + mutex_unlock(&pdata->lock);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void __iomem *
> +get_feature_ioaddr_by_index(struct device *dev, int index)
> +{
> + struct feature_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(dev);
> +
> + return pdata->features[index].ioaddr;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Wait register's _field to be changed to the given value (_expect's _field)
> + * by polling with given interval and timeout.
> + */
> +#define fpga_wait_register_field(_field, _expect, _reg_addr, _timeout, _invl)\
> +({ \
> + int wait = 0; \
> + int ret = -ETIMEDOUT; \
> + typeof(_expect) value; \
> + for (; wait <= _timeout; wait += _invl) { \
> + value.csr = readq(_reg_addr); \
> + if (_expect._field == value._field) { \
> + ret = 0; \
> + break; \
> + } \
> + udelay(_invl); \
> + } \
> + ret; \
> +})
can't you use iopoll and friends instead of this?
> +
> +#endif
> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/intel/pcie.c b/drivers/fpga/intel/pcie.c
> index 132d9da..28df63e 100644
> --- a/drivers/fpga/intel/pcie.c
> +++ b/drivers/fpga/intel/pcie.c
> @@ -25,10 +25,827 @@
> #include <linux/stddef.h>
> #include <linux/errno.h>
> #include <linux/aer.h>
> +#include <linux/fpga/fpga-dev.h>
> +
> +#include "feature-dev.h"
>
> #define DRV_VERSION "EXPERIMENTAL VERSION"
> #define DRV_NAME "intel-fpga-pci"
>
> +#define INTEL_FPGA_DEV "intel-fpga-dev"
> +
> +static DEFINE_MUTEX(fpga_id_mutex);
> +
> +enum fpga_id_type {
> + FME_ID, /* fme id allocation and mapping */
> + PORT_ID, /* port id allocation and mapping */
> + FPGA_ID_MAX,
> +};
> +
> +/* it is protected by fpga_id_mutex */
> +static struct idr fpga_ids[FPGA_ID_MAX];
> +
> +struct cci_drvdata {
> + struct device *fme_dev;
> +
> + struct mutex lock;
> + struct list_head port_dev_list;
> +
> + struct list_head regions; /* global list of pci bar mapping region */
> +};
> +
> +/* pci bar mapping info */
> +struct cci_pci_region {
> + int bar;
> + void __iomem *ioaddr; /* pointer to mapped bar region */
> + struct list_head node;
> +};
> +
> +static void fpga_ids_init(void)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(fpga_ids); i++)
> + idr_init(fpga_ids + i);
> +}
> +
> +static void fpga_ids_destroy(void)
> +{
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(fpga_ids); i++)
> + idr_destroy(fpga_ids + i);
> +}
> +
> +static int alloc_fpga_id(enum fpga_id_type type, struct device *dev)
> +{
> + int id;
> +
> + WARN_ON(type >= FPGA_ID_MAX);
> + mutex_lock(&fpga_id_mutex);
> + id = idr_alloc(fpga_ids + type, dev, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
> + mutex_unlock(&fpga_id_mutex);
> + return id;
> +}
> +
> +static void free_fpga_id(enum fpga_id_type type, int id)
> +{
> + WARN_ON(type >= FPGA_ID_MAX);
> + mutex_lock(&fpga_id_mutex);
> + idr_remove(fpga_ids + type, id);
> + mutex_unlock(&fpga_id_mutex);
> +}
> +
> +static void cci_pci_add_port_dev(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> + struct platform_device *port_dev)
> +{
> + struct cci_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
> + struct feature_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(&port_dev->dev);
> +
> + mutex_lock(&drvdata->lock);
> + list_add(&pdata->node, &drvdata->port_dev_list);
> + get_device(&pdata->dev->dev);
> + mutex_unlock(&drvdata->lock);
> +}
> +
> +static void cci_pci_remove_port_devs(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> + struct cci_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
> + struct feature_platform_data *pdata, *ptmp;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&drvdata->lock);
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(pdata, ptmp, &drvdata->port_dev_list, node) {
> + struct platform_device *port_dev = pdata->dev;
> +
> + /* the port should be unregistered first. */
> + WARN_ON(device_is_registered(&port_dev->dev));
> + list_del(&pdata->node);
> + free_fpga_id(PORT_ID, port_dev->id);
> + put_device(&port_dev->dev);
> + }
> + mutex_unlock(&drvdata->lock);
> +}
> +
> +/* info collection during feature dev build. */
> +struct build_feature_devs_info {
> + struct pci_dev *pdev;
> +
> + /*
> + * PCI BAR mapping info. Parsing feature list starts from
> + * BAR 0 and switch to different BARs to parse Port
> + */
> + void __iomem *ioaddr;
> + void __iomem *ioend;
> + int current_bar;
> +
> + /* points to FME header where the port offset is figured out. */
> + void __iomem *pfme_hdr;
> +
> + /* the container device for all feature devices */
> + struct fpga_dev *parent_dev;
> +
> + /* current feature device */
> + struct platform_device *feature_dev;
> +};
> +
> +static void cci_pci_release_regions(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> + struct cci_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
> + struct cci_pci_region *tmp, *region;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(region, tmp, &drvdata->regions, node) {
> + list_del(®ion->node);
> + if (region->ioaddr)
> + pci_iounmap(pdev, region->ioaddr);
> + devm_kfree(&pdev->dev, region);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static void __iomem *cci_pci_ioremap_bar(struct pci_dev *pdev, int bar)
> +{
> + struct cci_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
> + struct cci_pci_region *region;
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(region, &drvdata->regions, node)
> + if (region->bar == bar) {
> + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "BAR %d region exists\n", bar);
> + return region->ioaddr;
> + }
> +
> + region = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*region), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!region)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + region->bar = bar;
> + region->ioaddr = pci_ioremap_bar(pdev, bar);
> + if (!region->ioaddr) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "can't ioremap memory from BAR %d.\n", bar);
> + devm_kfree(&pdev->dev, region);
> + return NULL;
> + }
> +
> + list_add(®ion->node, &drvdata->regions);
> + return region->ioaddr;
> +}
> +
> +static int parse_start_from(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo, int bar)
> +{
> + binfo->ioaddr = cci_pci_ioremap_bar(binfo->pdev, bar);
> + if (!binfo->ioaddr)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + binfo->current_bar = bar;
> + binfo->ioend = binfo->ioaddr + pci_resource_len(binfo->pdev, bar);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int parse_start(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo)
> +{
> + /* fpga feature list starts from BAR 0 */
> + return parse_start_from(binfo, 0);
> +}
> +
> +/* switch the memory mapping to BAR# @bar */
> +static int parse_switch_to(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo, int bar)
> +{
> + return parse_start_from(binfo, bar);
> +}
> +
> +static struct build_feature_devs_info *
> +build_info_alloc_and_init(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> + struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo;
> +
> + binfo = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*binfo), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (binfo)
> + binfo->pdev = pdev;
> +
> + return binfo;
> +}
> +
> +static enum fpga_id_type feature_dev_id_type(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +{
> + if (!strcmp(pdev->name, FPGA_FEATURE_DEV_FME))
> + return FME_ID;
> +
> + if (!strcmp(pdev->name, FPGA_FEATURE_DEV_PORT))
> + return PORT_ID;
> +
> + WARN_ON(1);
> + return FPGA_ID_MAX;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * register current feature device, it is called when we need to switch to
> + * another feature parsing or we have parsed all features
> + */
> +static int build_info_commit_dev(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (!binfo->feature_dev)
> + return 0;
> +
> + ret = platform_device_add(binfo->feature_dev);
> + if (!ret) {
> + struct cci_drvdata *drvdata;
> +
> + drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(&binfo->pdev->dev);
> + if (feature_dev_id_type(binfo->feature_dev) == PORT_ID)
> + cci_pci_add_port_dev(binfo->pdev, binfo->feature_dev);
> + else
> + drvdata->fme_dev = get_device(&binfo->feature_dev->dev);
> +
> + /*
> + * reset it to avoid build_info_free() freeing their resource.
> + *
> + * The resource of successfully registered feature devices
> + * will be freed by platform_device_unregister(). See the
> + * comments in build_info_create_dev().
> + */
> + binfo->feature_dev = NULL;
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +build_info_create_dev(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo,
> + enum fpga_id_type type, int feature_nr, const char *name)
> +{
> + struct platform_device *fdev;
> + struct resource *res;
> + struct feature_platform_data *pdata;
> + int ret;
> +
> + /* we will create a new device, commit current device first */
> + ret = build_info_commit_dev(binfo);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + /*
> + * we use -ENODEV as the initialization indicator which indicates
> + * whether the id need to be reclaimed
> + */
> + fdev = binfo->feature_dev = platform_device_alloc(name, -ENODEV);
> + if (!fdev)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + fdev->id = alloc_fpga_id(type, &fdev->dev);
> + if (fdev->id < 0)
> + return fdev->id;
> +
> + fdev->dev.parent = &binfo->parent_dev->dev;
> +
> + /*
> + * we need not care the memory which is associated with the
we do not need to care *for* the memory ;-)
> + * platform device. After call platform_device_unregister(),
After calling ...
> + * it will be automatically freed by device's
> + * release() callback, platform_device_release().
> + */
> + pdata = feature_platform_data_alloc_and_init(fdev, feature_nr);
> + if (!pdata)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + /*
> + * the count should be initialized to 0 to make sure
> + *__fpga_port_enable() following __fpga_port_disable()
> + * works properly for port device.
> + * and it should always be 0 for fme device.
> + */
> + WARN_ON(pdata->disable_count);
> +
> + fdev->dev.platform_data = pdata;
> + fdev->num_resources = feature_nr;
> + fdev->resource = kcalloc(feature_nr, sizeof(*res), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!fdev->resource)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int remove_feature_dev(struct device *dev, void *data)
> +{
> + struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> +
> + platform_device_unregister(pdev);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int remove_parent_dev(struct device *dev, void *data)
> +{
> + /* remove platform devices attached in the parent device */
> + device_for_each_child(dev, NULL, remove_feature_dev);
> + fpga_dev_destroy(to_fpga_dev(dev));
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void remove_all_devs(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> + /* remove parent device and all its children. */
> + device_for_each_child(&pdev->dev, NULL, remove_parent_dev);
> +}
> +
> +static void build_info_free(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo)
> +{
> + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(binfo->parent_dev))
> + remove_all_devs(binfo->pdev);
> +
> + /*
> + * it is a valid id, free it. See comments in
> + * build_info_create_dev()
> + */
> + if (binfo->feature_dev && binfo->feature_dev->id >= 0)
> + free_fpga_id(feature_dev_id_type(binfo->feature_dev),
> + binfo->feature_dev->id);
> +
> + platform_device_put(binfo->feature_dev);
> +
> + devm_kfree(&binfo->pdev->dev, binfo);
> +}
> +
> +#define FEATURE_TYPE_AFU 0x1
> +#define FEATURE_TYPE_PRIVATE 0x3
> +
> +/* FME and PORT GUID are fixed */
> +#define FEATURE_FME_GUID "f9e17764-38f0-82fe-e346-524ae92aafbf"
> +#define FEATURE_PORT_GUID "6b355b87-b06c-9642-eb42-8d139398b43a"
> +
> +static bool feature_is_fme(struct feature_afu_header *afu_hdr)
> +{
> + uuid_le u;
> +
> + uuid_le_to_bin(FEATURE_FME_GUID, &u);
> +
> + return !uuid_le_cmp(u, afu_hdr->guid);
> +}
> +
> +static bool feature_is_port(struct feature_afu_header *afu_hdr)
> +{
> + uuid_le u;
> +
> + uuid_le_to_bin(FEATURE_PORT_GUID, &u);
> +
> + return !uuid_le_cmp(u, afu_hdr->guid);
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * UAFU GUID is dynamic as it can be changed after FME downloads different
> + * Green Bitstream to the port, so we treat the unknown GUIDs which are
> + * attached on port's feature list as UAFU.
> + */
> +static bool feature_is_UAFU(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo)
> +{
> + if (!binfo->feature_dev ||
> + feature_dev_id_type(binfo->feature_dev) != PORT_ID)
> + return false;
> +
> + return true;
> +}
> +
> +static void
> +build_info_add_sub_feature(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo,
> + int feature_id, const char *feature_name,
> + resource_size_t resource_size, void __iomem *start)
> +{
> +
> + struct platform_device *fdev = binfo->feature_dev;
> + struct feature_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(&fdev->dev);
> + struct resource *res = &fdev->resource[feature_id];
> +
> + res->start = pci_resource_start(binfo->pdev, binfo->current_bar) +
> + start - binfo->ioaddr;
> + res->end = res->start + resource_size - 1;
> + res->flags = IORESOURCE_MEM;
> + res->name = feature_name;
> +
> + feature_platform_data_add(pdata, feature_id,
> + feature_name, feature_id, start);
> +}
> +
> +struct feature_info {
> + const char *name;
> + resource_size_t resource_size;
> + int feature_index;
> +};
> +
> +/* indexed by fme feature IDs which are defined in 'enum fme_feature_id'. */
> +static struct feature_info fme_features[] = {
> + {
> + .name = FME_FEATURE_HEADER,
> + .resource_size = sizeof(struct feature_fme_header),
> + .feature_index = FME_FEATURE_ID_HEADER,
> + },
> + {
> + .name = FME_FEATURE_THERMAL_MGMT,
> + .resource_size = sizeof(struct feature_fme_thermal),
> + .feature_index = FME_FEATURE_ID_THERMAL_MGMT,
> + },
> + {
> + .name = FME_FEATURE_POWER_MGMT,
> + .resource_size = sizeof(struct feature_fme_power),
> + .feature_index = FME_FEATURE_ID_POWER_MGMT,
> + },
> + {
> + .name = FME_FEATURE_GLOBAL_PERF,
> + .resource_size = sizeof(struct feature_fme_gperf),
> + .feature_index = FME_FEATURE_ID_GLOBAL_PERF,
> + },
> + {
> + .name = FME_FEATURE_GLOBAL_ERR,
> + .resource_size = sizeof(struct feature_fme_err),
> + .feature_index = FME_FEATURE_ID_GLOBAL_ERR,
> + },
> + {
> + .name = FME_FEATURE_PR_MGMT,
> + .resource_size = sizeof(struct feature_fme_pr),
> + .feature_index = FME_FEATURE_ID_PR_MGMT,
> + }
> +};
> +
> +/* indexed by port feature IDs which are defined in 'enum port_feature_id'. */
> +static struct feature_info port_features[] = {
Could probably be const
> + {
> + .name = PORT_FEATURE_HEADER,
> + .resource_size = sizeof(struct feature_port_header),
> + .feature_index = PORT_FEATURE_ID_HEADER,
> + },
> + {
> + .name = PORT_FEATURE_ERR,
> + .resource_size = sizeof(struct feature_port_error),
> + .feature_index = PORT_FEATURE_ID_ERROR,
> + },
> + {
> + .name = PORT_FEATURE_UMSG,
> + .resource_size = sizeof(struct feature_port_umsg),
> + .feature_index = PORT_FEATURE_ID_UMSG,
> + },
> + {
> + /* This feature isn't available for now */
> + .name = PORT_FEATURE_PR,
> + .resource_size = 0,
> + .feature_index = PORT_FEATURE_ID_PR,
> + },
> + {
> + .name = PORT_FEATURE_STP,
> + .resource_size = sizeof(struct feature_port_stp),
> + .feature_index = PORT_FEATURE_ID_STP,
> + },
> + {
> + /*
> + * For User AFU feature, its region size is not fixed, but
> + * reported by register PortCapability.mmio_size. Resource
> + * size of UAFU will be set while parse port device.
> + */
> + .name = PORT_FEATURE_UAFU,
> + .resource_size = 0,
> + .feature_index = PORT_FEATURE_ID_UAFU,
> + },
> +};
> +
> +static int
> +create_feature_instance(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo,
> + void __iomem *start, struct feature_info *finfo)
> +{
> + if (binfo->ioend - start < finfo->resource_size)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + build_info_add_sub_feature(binfo, finfo->feature_index, finfo->name,
> + finfo->resource_size, start);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int parse_feature_fme(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo,
> + void __iomem *start)
> +{
> + struct cci_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(&binfo->pdev->dev);
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = build_info_create_dev(binfo, FME_ID, fme_feature_num(),
> + FPGA_FEATURE_DEV_FME);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + if (drvdata->fme_dev) {
> + dev_err(&binfo->pdev->dev, "Multiple FMEs are detected.\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + return create_feature_instance(binfo, start,
> + &fme_features[FME_FEATURE_ID_HEADER]);
> +}
> +
> +static int parse_feature_fme_private(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo,
> + struct feature_header *hdr)
> +{
> + struct feature_header header;
> +
> + header.csr = readq(hdr);
> +
> + if (header.id >= ARRAY_SIZE(fme_features)) {
> + dev_info(&binfo->pdev->dev, "FME feature id %x is not supported yet.\n",
> + header.id);
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + return create_feature_instance(binfo, hdr, &fme_features[header.id]);
> +}
> +
> +static int parse_feature_port(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo,
> + void __iomem *start)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = build_info_create_dev(binfo, PORT_ID, port_feature_num(),
> + FPGA_FEATURE_DEV_PORT);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> +
> + return create_feature_instance(binfo, start,
> + &port_features[PORT_FEATURE_ID_HEADER]);
> +}
> +
> +static void enable_port_uafu(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo,
> + void __iomem *start)
> +{
> + enum port_feature_id id = PORT_FEATURE_ID_UAFU;
> + struct feature_port_header *port_hdr;
> + struct feature_port_capability capability;
> +
> + port_hdr = (struct feature_port_header *)start;
> + capability.csr = readq(&port_hdr->capability);
> + port_features[id].resource_size = capability.mmio_size << 10;
> +
> + /*
> + * To enable User AFU, driver needs to clear reset bit on related port,
> + * otherwise the mmio space of this user AFU will be invalid.
> + */
> + if (port_features[id].resource_size)
> + fpga_port_reset(binfo->feature_dev);
> +}
> +
> +static int parse_feature_port_private(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo,
> + struct feature_header *hdr)
> +{
> + struct feature_header header;
> + enum port_feature_id id;
> +
> + header.csr = readq(hdr);
> + /*
> + * the region of port feature id is [0x10, 0x13], + 1 to reserve 0
> + * which is dedicated for port-hdr.
> + */
> + id = (header.id & 0x000f) + 1;
> +
> + if (id >= ARRAY_SIZE(port_features)) {
> + dev_info(&binfo->pdev->dev, "Port feature id %x is not supported yet.\n",
> + header.id);
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + return create_feature_instance(binfo, hdr, &port_features[id]);
> +}
> +
> +static int parse_feature_port_uafu(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo,
> + struct feature_header *hdr)
> +{
> + enum port_feature_id id = PORT_FEATURE_ID_UAFU;
> + int ret;
> +
> + if (port_features[id].resource_size) {
> + ret = create_feature_instance(binfo, hdr, &port_features[id]);
> + port_features[id].resource_size = 0;
> + } else {
> + dev_err(&binfo->pdev->dev, "the uafu feature header is mis-configured.\n");
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int parse_feature_afus(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo,
> + struct feature_header *hdr)
> +{
> + int ret;
> + struct feature_afu_header *afu_hdr, header;
> + void __iomem *start;
> + void __iomem *end = binfo->ioend;
> +
> + start = hdr;
> + for (; start < end; start += header.next_afu) {
> + if (end - start < (sizeof(*afu_hdr) + sizeof(*hdr)))
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> + hdr = start;
> + afu_hdr = (struct feature_afu_header *) (hdr + 1);
> + header.csr = readq(&afu_hdr->csr);
> +
> + if (feature_is_fme(afu_hdr)) {
> + ret = parse_feature_fme(binfo, hdr);
> + binfo->pfme_hdr = hdr;
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + } else if (feature_is_port(afu_hdr)) {
> + ret = parse_feature_port(binfo, hdr);
> + enable_port_uafu(binfo, hdr);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + } else if (feature_is_UAFU(binfo)) {
> + ret = parse_feature_port_uafu(binfo, hdr);
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
> + } else
> + dev_info(&binfo->pdev->dev, "AFU GUID %pUl is not supported yet.\n",
> + afu_hdr->guid.b);
> +
> + if (!header.next_afu)
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int parse_feature_private(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo,
> + struct feature_header *hdr)
> +{
> + struct feature_header header;
> +
> + header.csr = readq(hdr);
> +
> + if (!binfo->feature_dev) {
> + dev_err(&binfo->pdev->dev, "the private feature %x does not belong to any AFU.\n",
> + header.id);
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + switch (feature_dev_id_type(binfo->feature_dev)) {
> + case FME_ID:
> + return parse_feature_fme_private(binfo, hdr);
> + case PORT_ID:
> + return parse_feature_port_private(binfo, hdr);
> + default:
> + dev_info(&binfo->pdev->dev, "private feature %x belonging to AFU %s is not supported yet.\n",
> + header.id, binfo->feature_dev->name);
> + }
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int parse_feature(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo,
> + struct feature_header *hdr)
> +{
> + struct feature_header header;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + header.csr = readq(hdr);
> +
> + switch (header.type) {
> + case FEATURE_TYPE_AFU:
> + ret = parse_feature_afus(binfo, hdr);
> + break;
> + case FEATURE_TYPE_PRIVATE:
> + ret = parse_feature_private(binfo, hdr);
> + break;
> + default:
> + dev_info(&binfo->pdev->dev,
> + "Feature Type %x is not supported.\n", hdr->type);
> + };
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int
> +parse_feature_list(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo, void __iomem *start)
> +{
> + struct feature_header *hdr, header;
> + void __iomem *end = binfo->ioend;
> + int ret = 0;
> +
> + for (; start < end; start += header.next_header_offset) {
> + if (end - start < sizeof(*hdr)) {
> + dev_err(&binfo->pdev->dev, "The region is too small to contain a feature.\n");
> + ret = -EINVAL;
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + hdr = (struct feature_header *)start;
> + ret = parse_feature(binfo, hdr);
> + if (ret)
> + break;
> +
> + header.csr = readq(hdr);
> + if (!header.next_header_offset)
> + break;
> + }
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int parse_ports_from_fme(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo)
> +{
> + struct feature_fme_header *fme_hdr;
> + struct feature_fme_port port;
> + int i = 0, ret = 0;
> +
> + if (binfo->pfme_hdr == NULL) {
> + dev_dbg(&binfo->pdev->dev, "VF is detected.\n");
> + return ret;
> + }
> +
> + fme_hdr = binfo->pfme_hdr;
> +
> + do {
> + port.csr = readq(&fme_hdr->port[i]);
> + if (!port.port_implemented)
> + break;
> +
> + ret = parse_switch_to(binfo, port.port_bar);
> + if (ret)
> + break;
> +
> + ret = parse_feature_list(binfo,
> + binfo->ioaddr + port.port_offset);
> + if (ret)
> + break;
> + } while (++i < MAX_FPGA_PORT_NUM);
> +
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static int create_init_drvdata(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> + struct cci_drvdata *drvdata;
> +
> + drvdata = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*drvdata), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!drvdata)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + mutex_init(&drvdata->lock);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&drvdata->port_dev_list);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&drvdata->regions);
> +
> + dev_set_drvdata(&pdev->dev, drvdata);
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void destroy_drvdata(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> + struct cci_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
> +
> + if (drvdata->fme_dev) {
> + /* fme device should be unregistered first. */
> + WARN_ON(device_is_registered(drvdata->fme_dev));
> + free_fpga_id(FME_ID, to_platform_device(drvdata->fme_dev)->id);
> + put_device(drvdata->fme_dev);
> + }
> +
> + cci_pci_remove_port_devs(pdev);
> + cci_pci_release_regions(pdev);
> + dev_set_drvdata(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> + devm_kfree(&pdev->dev, drvdata);
> +}
> +
> +static int cci_pci_create_feature_devs(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> +{
> + struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo;
> + int ret;
> +
> + binfo = build_info_alloc_and_init(pdev);
> + if (!binfo)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + binfo->parent_dev = fpga_dev_create(&pdev->dev, INTEL_FPGA_DEV);
> + if (IS_ERR(binfo->parent_dev)) {
> + ret = PTR_ERR(binfo->parent_dev);
> + goto free_binfo_exit;
> + }
> +
> + ret = parse_start(binfo);
> + if (ret)
> + goto free_binfo_exit;
> +
> + ret = parse_feature_list(binfo, binfo->ioaddr);
> + if (ret)
> + goto free_binfo_exit;
> +
> + ret = parse_ports_from_fme(binfo);
> + if (ret)
> + goto free_binfo_exit;
> +
> + ret = build_info_commit_dev(binfo);
> + if (ret)
> + goto free_binfo_exit;
> +
> + /*
> + * everything is okay, reset ->parent_dev to stop it being
> + * freed by build_info_free()
> + */
> + binfo->parent_dev = NULL;
> +
> +free_binfo_exit:
> + build_info_free(binfo);
> + return ret;
> +}
> +
> /* PCI Device ID */
> #define PCIe_DEVICE_ID_PF_INT_5_X 0xBCBD
> #define PCIe_DEVICE_ID_PF_INT_6_X 0xBCC0
> @@ -83,9 +900,18 @@ int cci_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pcidev, const struct pci_device_id *pcidevid)
> goto release_region_exit;
> }
>
> - /* TODO: create and add the platform device per feature list */
> + ret = create_init_drvdata(pcidev);
> + if (ret)
> + goto release_region_exit;
> +
> + ret = cci_pci_create_feature_devs(pcidev);
> + if (ret)
> + goto destroy_drvdata_exit;
> +
> return 0;
>
> +destroy_drvdata_exit:
> + destroy_drvdata(pcidev);
> release_region_exit:
> pci_release_regions(pcidev);
> disable_error_report_exit:
> @@ -97,6 +923,8 @@ int cci_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pcidev, const struct pci_device_id *pcidevid)
>
> static void cci_pci_remove(struct pci_dev *pcidev)
> {
> + remove_all_devs(pcidev);
> + destroy_drvdata(pcidev);
> pci_release_regions(pcidev);
> pci_disable_pcie_error_reporting(pcidev);
> pci_disable_device(pcidev);
> @@ -111,14 +939,23 @@ static struct pci_driver cci_pci_driver = {
>
> static int __init ccidrv_init(void)
> {
> + int ret;
> +
> pr_info("Intel(R) FPGA PCIe Driver: Version %s\n", DRV_VERSION);
>
> - return pci_register_driver(&cci_pci_driver);
> + fpga_ids_init();
> +
> + ret = pci_register_driver(&cci_pci_driver);
> + if (ret)
> + fpga_ids_destroy();
> +
> + return ret;
> }
>
> static void __exit ccidrv_exit(void)
> {
> pci_unregister_driver(&cci_pci_driver);
> + fpga_ids_destroy();
> }
>
> module_init(ccidrv_init);
> --
> 2.7.4
>
Thanks,
Moritz
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 455 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 01/16] docs: fpga: add a document for Intel FPGA driver overview
2017-04-02 14:41 ` [PATCH 01/16] docs: fpga: add a document for Intel FPGA driver overview Moritz Fischer
2017-04-03 20:44 ` Alan Tull
@ 2017-04-04 5:06 ` Wu Hao
2017-04-11 18:02 ` Alan Tull
2 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Wu Hao @ 2017-04-04 5:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Moritz Fischer
Cc: Alan Tull, matthew.gerlach, Moritz Fischer, linux-fpga,
linux-kernel, luwei.kang, yi.z.zhang, Enno Luebbers,
Xiao Guangrong
On Sun, Apr 02, 2017 at 07:41:46AM -0700, Moritz Fischer wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 01, 2017 at 07:16:19PM +0800, Wu Hao wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 01:38:06PM -0500, Alan Tull wrote:
> > > On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 1:24 PM, <matthew.gerlach@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 30 Mar 2017, Wu Hao wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi Wu Hao,
> > > >
> > > > Great documentation. I'm looking forward to diving into the rest of the
> > > > patches. Please see my comments inline.
> > > >
> > > > Matthew Gerlach
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> Add a document for Intel FPGA driver overview.
> > > >>
> > > >> Signed-off-by: Enno Luebbers <enno.luebbers@intel.com>
> > > >> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
> > > >> Signed-off-by: Wu Hao <hao.wu@intel.com>
> > > >> ---
> > > >> Documentation/fpga/intel-fpga.txt | 259
> > > >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > >> 1 file changed, 259 insertions(+)
> > > >> create mode 100644 Documentation/fpga/intel-fpga.txt
> > > >>
> > > >> diff --git a/Documentation/fpga/intel-fpga.txt
> > > >> b/Documentation/fpga/intel-fpga.txt
> > > >> new file mode 100644
> > > >> index 0000000..9396cea
> > > >> --- /dev/null
> > > >> +++ b/Documentation/fpga/intel-fpga.txt
> > > >> @@ -0,0 +1,259 @@
> > > >>
> > > >> +===============================================================================
> > > >> + Intel FPGA driver Overview
> > > >>
> > > >> +-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > >> + Enno Luebbers <enno.luebbers@intel.com>
> > > >> + Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
> > > >> + Wu Hao <hao.wu@intel.com>
> > > >> +
> > > >> +The Intel FPGA driver provides interfaces for userspace applications to
> > > >> +configure, enumerate, open, and access FPGA accelerators on platforms
> > > >> equipped
> > > >> +with Intel(R) FPGA solutions and enables system level management
> > > >> functions such
> > > >> +as FPGA reconfiguration, power management, and virtualization.
> > > >> +
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > From a Linux kernel perspective, I'm not sure this is the best name for
> > > > this code. The name gives me the impression that it is a driver for all
> > > > Intel FPGAs, but not all Intel FPGAs are connected to the processor over a
> > > > PCIe bus. The processor could be directely connected like the Arria10
> > > > SOCFPGA. Such a processor could certainly benefit from this accelerator
> > > > usage model. In an extreme case, couldn't a processor in the FPGA,
> > > > running Linux, also benefit from this accelerator model? Is this code a
> > > > "FPGA Accelerator Framework"?
> > > >
> > > >> +HW Architecture
> > > >> +===============
> > > >> +From the OS's point of view, the FPGA hardware appears as a regular PCIe
> > > >> device.
> > > >> +The FPGA device memory is organized using a predefined data structure
> > > >> (Device
> > > >> +Feature List). Features supported by the particular FPGA device are
> > > >> exposed
> > > >> +through these data structures, as illustrated below:
> > > >> +
> > > >> + +-------------------------------+ +-------------+
> > > >> + | PF | | VF |
> > > >> + +-------------------------------+ +-------------+
> > > >> + ^ ^ ^ ^
> > > >> + | | | |
> > > >> ++-----|------------|---------|--------------|-------+
> > > >> +| | | | | |
> > > >> +| +-----+ +-------+ +-------+ +-------+ |
> > > >> +| | FME | | Port0 | | Port1 | | Port2 | |
> > > >> +| +-----+ +-------+ +-------+ +-------+ |
> > > >> +| ^ ^ ^ |
> > > >> +| | | | |
> > > >> +| +-------+ +------+ +-------+ |
> > > >> +| | AFU | | AFU | | AFU | |
> > > >> +| +-------+ +------+ +-------+ |
> > > >> +| |
> > > >> +| FPGA PCIe Device |
> > > >> ++---------------------------------------------------+
> > > >> +
> > > >> +The driver supports PCIe SR-IOV to create virtual functions (VFs) which
> > > >> can be
> > > >> +used to assign individual accelerators to virtual machines .
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Does this HW Architecture require an Intel FPGA? Couldn't any vendors FPGA
> > > > be used as long as it presented itself the PCIe bus the same and contained
> > > > an appropriate Device Feature List?
>
> I think this is a good (and important) point. Especially when sysfs
> entries & ioctls constituting ABI depend on it.
Thanks for your feedback and comments.
I'm not sure if any vendors FPGA will resue the same. But if the same FME
or Port/AFU module implemented in their hardwares, then they should be
able to use our FME/AFU drivers.
AFU driver creates interfaces for FPGA accelerators. And FME driver creates
interfaces for FPGA partial reconfiguration and other management functions.
As mentioned in 'Open discussions' below, we may need to switch to the ABI
(sysfs) of fpga-region for PR.
>
> > > >
> > > >> +
> > > >> +FME (FPGA Management Engine)
> > > >> +============================
> > > >> +The FPGA Management Enging performs power and thermal management, error
> Enging->Engine
> > > >> +reporting, reconfiguration, performance reporting, and other
> > > >> infrastructure
> > > >> +functions. Each FPGA has one FME, which is always accessed through the
> > > >> physical
> > > >> +function (PF).
> > > >> +
> > > >> +User-space applications can acquire exclusive access to the FME using
> > > >> open(),
> > > >> +and release it using close().
> > > >> +
> > > >> +The following functions are exposed through ioctls:
> > > >> +
> > > >> + Get driver API version (FPGA_GET_API_VERSION)
> > > >> + Check for extensions (FPGA_CHECK_EXTENSION)
> > > >> + Assign port to PF (FPGA_FME_PORT_ASSIGN)
> > > >> + Release port from PF (FPGA_FME_PORT_RELEASE)
> > > >> + Program bitstream (FPGA_FME_PORT_PR)
> > > >> +
> > > >> +More functions are exposed through sysfs
> > > >> +(/sys/class/fpga/fpga.n/intel-fpga-fme.n/):
> > > >> +
> > > >> + Read bitstream ID (bitstream_id)
> > > >> + Read bitstream metadata (bitstream_metadata)
> > > >> + Read number of ports (ports_num)
> > > >> + Read socket ID (socket_id)
> > > >> + Read performance counters (perf/)
> > > >> + Power management (power_mgmt/)
> > > >> + Thermal management (thermal_mgmt/)
> > > >> + Error reporting (errors/)
> > > >> +
> > > >> +PORT
> > > >> +====
> > > >> +A port represents the interface between the static FPGA fabric (the "blue
> > > >> +bitstream") and a partially reconfigurable region containing an AFU (the
> > > >> "green
> > >
> > > Is this an fpga bridge but with added features?
> >
> > Yes, I think so. As you see the fme_pr function in patch 11, related port needs
> > to be disabled firstly before fpga_mgr_buf_load for given accelerator.
>
> Can we just extend the bridge to have the additional features, please?
As described in this document, in Intel FPGA device, there are two types
of modudles, FME which provides management function including PR and AFU
which provides the access to the FPGA accelerators, and other advanced
features (e.g error reporting, debug, reset and etc) required by user
space applications.
I think FME needs to create fpga-bridge as well as fpga-manager and
regions. Then enable/disable bridge action could be covered automatically
by fpga-region function. (e.g fpga_region_program_fpga).
Thanks
Hao
>
> > > >> +bitstream"). It controls the communication from SW to the accelerator and
> > > >> +exposes features such as reset and debug.
> > > >> +
> > > >> +A PCIe device may have several ports and each port can be released from
> > > >> PF by
> > > >> +FPGA_FME_PORT_RELEASE ioctl on FME, and exposed through a VF via PCIe
> > > >> sriov
> > > >> +sysfs interface.
> > > >> +
> > > >> +AFU
> > > >> +===
> > > >> +An AFU is attached to a port and exposes a 256k MMIO region to be used
> > > >> for
> > > >> +accelerator-specific control registers.
> > > >> +
> > > >> +User-space applications can acquire exclusive access to an AFU attached
> > > >> to a
> > > >> +port by using open() on the port device node, and release it using
> > > >> close().
> > > >> +
> > > >> +The following functions are exposed through ioctls:
> > > >> +
> > > >> + Get driver API version (FPGA_GET_API_VERSION)
> > > >> + Check for extensions (FPGA_CHECK_EXTENSION)
> > > >> + Get port info (FPGA_PORT_GET_INFO)
> > > >> + Get MMIO region info (FPGA_PORT_GET_REGION_INFO)
> > > >> + Map DMA buffer (FPGA_PORT_DMA_MAP)
> > > >> + Unmap DMA buffer (FPGA_PORT_DMA_UNMAP)
> > > >> + Reset AFU (FPGA_PORT_RESET)
> > > >> + Enable UMsg (FPGA_PORT_UMSG_ENABLE)
> > > >> + Disable UMsg (FPGA_PORT_UMSG_DISABLE)
> > > >> + Set UMsg mode (FPGA_PORT_UMSG_SET_MODE)
> > > >> + Set UMsg base address (FPGA_PORT_UMSG_SET_BASE_ADDR)
> > > >> +
> > > >> +User-space applications can also mmap() accelerator MMIO regions.
> > > >> +
> > > >> +More functions are exposed through sysfs:
> > > >> +(/sys/class/fpga/fpga.n/intel-fpga-port.m/):
> > > >> +
> > > >> + Read Accelerator GUID (afu_id)
> > > >> + Error reporting (errors/)
> > > >> +
> > > >> +Partial Reconfiguration
> > > >> +=======================
> > > >> +As mentioned above, accelerators can be reconfigured through partial
> > > >> +reconfiguration of a green bitstream file (GBS). The green bitstream must
> > > >> have
> > > >> +been generated for the exact blue bitstream and targeted reconfigurable
> > > >> region
> > > >> +(port) of the FPGA; otherwise, the reconfiguration operation will fail
> > > >> and
> > > >> +possibly cause system instability. This compatibility can be checked by
> > > >> +comparing the interface ID noted in the GBS header against the interface
> > > >> ID
> > > >> +exposed by the FME through sysfs (see above). This check is usually done
> > > >> by
> > > >> +user-space before calling the reconfiguration IOCTL.
> > > >> +
> > > >> +FPGA virtualization
> > > >> +===================
> > > >> +To enable accessing an accelerator from applications running in a VM, the
> > > >> +respective AFU's port needs to be assigned to a VF using the following
> > > >> steps:
> > > >> +
> > > >> + a) The PF owns all AFU ports by default. Any port that needs to be
> > > >> reassigned
> > > >> + to a VF must be released from PF firstly through the
> > > >> FPGA_FME_PORT_RELEASE
> > > >> + ioctl on the FME device.
> > > >> +
> > > >> + b) Once N ports are released from PF, then user can use below command to
> > > >> + enable SRIOV and VFs. Each VF owns only one Port with AFU.
> > > >> +
> > > >> + echo N > $PCI_DEVICE_PATH/sriov_numvfs
> > > >> +
> > > >> + c) Pass through the VFs to VMs
> > > >> +
> > > >> + d) The AFU under VF is accessiable from applications in VM (using the
> > > >> same
> > > >> + driver inside the VF).
> > > >> +
> > > >> +Note the an FME can't be assigned to a VF, thus PR and other management
> > > >> +functions are only available via the PF.
> > > >> +
> > > >> +
> > > >> +Driver organization
> > > >> +===================
> > > >> +
> > > >> + +------------------+ +---------+ | +---------+
> > > >> + | +-------+ | | | | | |
> > > >> + | | FPGA | FME | | AFU | | | AFU |
> > > >> + | |Manager| Module | | Module | | | Module |
> > > >> + | +-------+ | | | | | |
> > > >> + +------------------+ +---------+ | +---------+
> > > >> + +-----------------------+ | +-----------------------+
> > > >> + | FPGA Container Device | | | FPGA Container Device |
> > > >> + +-----------------------+ | +-----------------------+
> > > >> + +------------------+ | +------------------+
> > > >> + | FPGA PCIE Module | | Virtual | FPGA PCIE Module |
> > > >> + +------------------+ Host | Machine +------------------+
> > > >> + ------------------------------------ | ------------------------------
> > > >> + +---------------+ | +---------------+
> > > >> + | PCI PF Device | | | PCI VF Device |
> > > >> + +---------------+ | +---------------+
> > > >> +
> > > >> +The FPGA devices appear as regular PCIe devices; thus, the FPGA PCIe
> > > >> device
> > > >> +driver is always loaded first once a FPGA PCIE PF or VF device is
> > > >> detected. This
> > > >> +driver plays an infrastructural role in the driver architecuture. It:
> > > >> +
> > > >> + a) creates FPGA container device as parent of the feature devices.
> > > >> + b) walks through the Device Feature List, which is implemented in
> > > >> PCIE
> > > >> + device BAR memory, to discover feature devices and their sub
> > > >> features
> > > >> + and create platform device for them under the container device.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I really like the idea of creating platform devices for the sub features. It
> > > > is in line with other FPGA use cases. Platform devices are at the heart of
> > > > device trees used by processors directly connected FPGAs and processors
> > > > inside FPGAs.
> > > >
> > > >> + c) supports SRIOV.
> > > >> + d) introduces the feature device infrastructure, which abstracts
> > > >> + operations for sub features and exposes common functions to
> > > >> feature
> > > >> + device drivers.
> > > >> +
> > > >> +The FPGA Management Engine (FME) driver is a platform driver which is
> > > >> loaded
> > > >> +automatically after FME platform device creation from the PCIE driver. It
> > > >> +provides the key features for FPGA management, including:
> > > >> +
> > > >> + a) Power and thermal management, error reporting, performance
> > > >> reporting
> > > >> + and other infrastructure functions. Users can access these
> > > >> functions
> > > >> + via sysfs interfaces exposed by FME driver.
> > > >> + b) Paritial Reconfiguration. The FME driver registers a FPGA
> > > >> Manager
> > > >> + during PR sub feature initialization; once it receives an
> > > >> + FPGA_FME_PORT_PR ioctl from user, it invokes the common
> > > >> interface
> > > >> + function from FPGA Manager to complete the partial
> > > >> reconfiguration of
> > > >> + the bitstream to the given port.
> > > >> + c) Port management for virtualization. The FME driver introduces
> > > >> two
> > > >> + ioctls, FPGA_FME_PORT_RELEASE (releases given port from PF) and
> > > >> + FPGA_FME_PORT_ASSIGN (assigns the port back to PF). Once the
> > > >> port is
> > > >> + released from the PF, it can be assigned to the VF through the
> > > >> SRIOV
> > > >> + interfaces provided by PCIE driver. (Refer to "FPGA
> > > >> virtualization"
> > > >> + for more details).
> > > >> +
> > > >> +Similar to the the FME driver, the FPGA Accelerated Function Unit (AFU)
> > > >> driver
> > > >> +is probed once the AFU platform device is created. The main function of
> > > >> this
> > > >> +module is to provide an interface for userspace applications to access
> > > >> the
> > > >> +individual accelerators, including basic reset control on port, AFU MMIO
> > > >> region
> > > >> +export, dma buffer mapping service, UMsg notification, and remote debug
> > > >> +functions (see above).
> > > >> +
> > > >> +
> > > >> +Device enumeration
> > > >> +==================
> > > >> +This section introduces how applications enumerate the fpga device from
> > > >> +the sysfs hierarchy under /sys/class/fpga.
> > > >> +
> > > >> +In the example below, two Intel(R) FPGA devices are installed in the
> > > >> host. Each
> > > >> +fpga device has one FME and two ports (AFUs).
> > > >> +
> > > >> +For each FPGA device, a device director is created under
> > > >> /sys/class/fpga/:
> > > >> +
> > > >> + /sys/class/fpga/fpga.0
> > > >> + /sys/class/fpga/fpga.1
> > > >> +
> > > >> +The Intel(R) FPGA device driver exposes "intel-fpga-dev" as the FPGA's
> > > >> name.
> > > >> +Application can retrieve name information via the sysfs interface:
> > > >> +
> > > >> + /sys/class/fpga/fpga.0/name
> > > >> +
> > > >> +Each node has one FME and two ports (AFUs) as child devices:
> > > >> +
> > > >> + /sys/class/fpga/fpga.0/intel-fpga-fme.0
> > > >> + /sys/class/fpga/fpga.0/intel-fpga-port.0
> > > >> + /sys/class/fpga/fpga.0/intel-fpga-port.1
> > > >> +
> > > >> + /sys/class/fpga/fpga.1/intel-fpga-fme.1
> > > >> + /sys/class/fpga/fpga.1/intel-fpga-port.2
> > > >> + /sys/class/fpga/fpga.1/intel-fpga-port.3
> > > >> +
> > > >> +In general, the FME/AFU sysfs interfaces are named as follows:
> > > >> +
> > > >> + /sys/class/fpga/<fpga.n>/<intel-fpga-fme.n>/
> > > >> + /sys/class/fpga/<fpga.n>/<intel-fpga-port.m>/
> > > >> +
> > > >> +with 'n' consecutively numbering all FMEs and 'm' consecutively numbering
> > > >> all
> > > >> +ports.
> > > >> +
> > > >> +The device nodes used for ioctl() or mmap() can be referenced through:
> > > >> +
> > > >> + /sys/class/fpga/<fpga.n>/<intel-fpga-port.n>/dev
> > > >> + /sys/class/fpga/<fpga.n>/<intel-fpga-fme.n>/dev
> > > >> +
> > > >> +
> > > >> +Open discussions
> > > >> +================
> > > >> +The current FME driver does not provide user space access to the FME MMIO
> > > >> +region, but exposes access through sysfs and ioctls. It also provides an
> > > >> FPGA
> > > >> +manger interface for partial reconfiguration (PR), but does not make use
> > > >> of
> > > >> +fpga-regions. User PR requests via the FPGA_FME_PORT_PR ioctl are handled
> > > >> inside
> > > >> +the FME, and fpga-region depends on device tree which is not used at all.
> > > >> There
> > > >> +are patches from Alan Tull to separate the device tree specific code and
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I am currently trying to use those patches in a different driver. They've
> > > > compiled cleanly in my out of tree pcie module driver against the 3.10
> > > > kernel.
> > > > I need to actually write the code to create and register the region, but
> > > > Alan's platform driver code should be a good guide for me. Just need to
> > > > find the time.
> > > >
> > > >> +introduce a sysfs interface for PR. We plan to add fpga-regions support
> > > >> in the
> > > >> +driver once the related patches get merged. Then the FME driver should
> > > >> create
> > > >> +one fpga-region for each Port/AFU.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Does the FME driver create the fpga-region, or is each region described as
> > > > an entry in the Device Feature List and therefore created by the code that
> > > > enumerates the Device Feature List?
> > > >
> > > >> --
> > > >> 2.7.4
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fpga" in
> > > >> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> > > >> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > > >>
> > > >
>
> Cheers,
> Moritz
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 01/16] docs: fpga: add a document for Intel FPGA driver overview
2017-04-03 20:44 ` Alan Tull
@ 2017-04-04 5:24 ` Wu Hao
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Wu Hao @ 2017-04-04 5:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Tull
Cc: Moritz Fischer, matthew.gerlach, Moritz Fischer, linux-fpga,
linux-kernel, luwei.kang, yi.z.zhang, Enno Luebbers,
Xiao Guangrong
On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 03:44:17PM -0500, Alan Tull wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org> wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 01, 2017 at 07:16:19PM +0800, Wu Hao wrote:
> >> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 01:38:06PM -0500, Alan Tull wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 1:24 PM, <matthew.gerlach@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > On Thu, 30 Mar 2017, Wu Hao wrote:
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Hi Wu Hao,
> >> > >
> >> > > Great documentation. I'm looking forward to diving into the rest of the
> >> > > patches. Please see my comments inline.
> >> > >
> >> > > Matthew Gerlach
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > >> Add a document for Intel FPGA driver overview.
> >> > >>
> >> > >> Signed-off-by: Enno Luebbers <enno.luebbers@intel.com>
> >> > >> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
> >> > >> Signed-off-by: Wu Hao <hao.wu@intel.com>
> >> > >> ---
> >> > >> Documentation/fpga/intel-fpga.txt | 259
> >> > >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> > >> 1 file changed, 259 insertions(+)
> >> > >> create mode 100644 Documentation/fpga/intel-fpga.txt
> >> > >>
> >> > >> diff --git a/Documentation/fpga/intel-fpga.txt
> >> > >> b/Documentation/fpga/intel-fpga.txt
> >> > >> new file mode 100644
> >> > >> index 0000000..9396cea
> >> > >> --- /dev/null
> >> > >> +++ b/Documentation/fpga/intel-fpga.txt
> >> > >> @@ -0,0 +1,259 @@
> >> > >>
> >> > >> +===============================================================================
> >> > >> + Intel FPGA driver Overview
> >> > >>
> >> > >> +-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> > >> + Enno Luebbers <enno.luebbers@intel.com>
> >> > >> + Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
> >> > >> + Wu Hao <hao.wu@intel.com>
> >> > >> +
> >> > >> +The Intel FPGA driver provides interfaces for userspace applications to
> >> > >> +configure, enumerate, open, and access FPGA accelerators on platforms
> >> > >> equipped
> >> > >> +with Intel(R) FPGA solutions and enables system level management
> >> > >> functions such
> >> > >> +as FPGA reconfiguration, power management, and virtualization.
> >> > >> +
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > From a Linux kernel perspective, I'm not sure this is the best name for
> >> > > this code. The name gives me the impression that it is a driver for all
> >> > > Intel FPGAs, but not all Intel FPGAs are connected to the processor over a
> >> > > PCIe bus. The processor could be directely connected like the Arria10
> >> > > SOCFPGA. Such a processor could certainly benefit from this accelerator
> >> > > usage model. In an extreme case, couldn't a processor in the FPGA,
> >> > > running Linux, also benefit from this accelerator model? Is this code a
> >> > > "FPGA Accelerator Framework"?
> >> > >
> >> > >> +HW Architecture
> >> > >> +===============
> >> > >> +From the OS's point of view, the FPGA hardware appears as a regular PCIe
> >> > >> device.
> >> > >> +The FPGA device memory is organized using a predefined data structure
> >> > >> (Device
> >> > >> +Feature List). Features supported by the particular FPGA device are
> >> > >> exposed
> >> > >> +through these data structures, as illustrated below:
> >> > >> +
> >> > >> + +-------------------------------+ +-------------+
> >> > >> + | PF | | VF |
> >> > >> + +-------------------------------+ +-------------+
> >> > >> + ^ ^ ^ ^
> >> > >> + | | | |
> >> > >> ++-----|------------|---------|--------------|-------+
> >> > >> +| | | | | |
> >> > >> +| +-----+ +-------+ +-------+ +-------+ |
> >> > >> +| | FME | | Port0 | | Port1 | | Port2 | |
> >> > >> +| +-----+ +-------+ +-------+ +-------+ |
> >> > >> +| ^ ^ ^ |
> >> > >> +| | | | |
> >> > >> +| +-------+ +------+ +-------+ |
> >> > >> +| | AFU | | AFU | | AFU | |
> >> > >> +| +-------+ +------+ +-------+ |
> >> > >> +| |
> >> > >> +| FPGA PCIe Device |
> >> > >> ++---------------------------------------------------+
> >> > >> +
> >> > >> +The driver supports PCIe SR-IOV to create virtual functions (VFs) which
> >> > >> can be
> >> > >> +used to assign individual accelerators to virtual machines .
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Does this HW Architecture require an Intel FPGA? Couldn't any vendors FPGA
> >> > > be used as long as it presented itself the PCIe bus the same and contained
> >> > > an appropriate Device Feature List?
> >
> > I think this is a good (and important) point. Especially when sysfs
> > entries & ioctls constituting ABI depend on it.
> >
> >> > >
> >> > >> +
> >> > >> +FME (FPGA Management Engine)
> >> > >> +============================
> >> > >> +The FPGA Management Enging performs power and thermal management, error
> > Enging->Engine
> >> > >> +reporting, reconfiguration, performance reporting, and other
> >> > >> infrastructure
> >> > >> +functions. Each FPGA has one FME, which is always accessed through the
> >> > >> physical
> >> > >> +function (PF).
> >> > >> +
> >> > >> +User-space applications can acquire exclusive access to the FME using
> >> > >> open(),
> >> > >> +and release it using close().
> >> > >> +
> >> > >> +The following functions are exposed through ioctls:
> >> > >> +
> >> > >> + Get driver API version (FPGA_GET_API_VERSION)
> >> > >> + Check for extensions (FPGA_CHECK_EXTENSION)
> >> > >> + Assign port to PF (FPGA_FME_PORT_ASSIGN)
> >> > >> + Release port from PF (FPGA_FME_PORT_RELEASE)
> >> > >> + Program bitstream (FPGA_FME_PORT_PR)
> >> > >> +
> >> > >> +More functions are exposed through sysfs
> >> > >> +(/sys/class/fpga/fpga.n/intel-fpga-fme.n/):
> >> > >> +
> >> > >> + Read bitstream ID (bitstream_id)
> >> > >> + Read bitstream metadata (bitstream_metadata)
> >> > >> + Read number of ports (ports_num)
> >> > >> + Read socket ID (socket_id)
> >> > >> + Read performance counters (perf/)
> >> > >> + Power management (power_mgmt/)
> >> > >> + Thermal management (thermal_mgmt/)
> >> > >> + Error reporting (errors/)
> >> > >> +
> >> > >> +PORT
> >> > >> +====
> >> > >> +A port represents the interface between the static FPGA fabric (the "blue
> >> > >> +bitstream") and a partially reconfigurable region containing an AFU (the
> >> > >> "green
> >> >
> >> > Is this an fpga bridge but with added features?
> >>
> >> Yes, I think so. As you see the fme_pr function in patch 11, related port needs
> >> to be disabled firstly before fpga_mgr_buf_load for given accelerator.
> >
> > Can we just extend the bridge to have the additional features, please?
>
> OK then this code is taking place of a fpga-region that controls the
> bridge (port) and fpga-mgr during fpga programming.
>
As mentioned in last email replied to Moritz, I prefer to have fpga-bridge
in FME module together with fpga-region and fpga-manager, and reuse fpga
region related function for PR. Other functions which required by user
space applications when access the FPGA acclerator, should be covered in
AFU driver.
Please notice that In VF case (e.g in virtual machine), there is no FME
at all, but only FPGA accelerators (AFUs). Create a duplciate fpga-bridge
in AFU driver seems not useful.
Thanks
Hao
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 04/16] fpga: intel: pcie: parse feature list and create platform device for features.
2017-04-04 2:44 ` [PATCH 04/16] fpga: intel: pcie: parse feature list and create platform device for features Moritz Fischer
@ 2017-04-05 12:57 ` Wu Hao
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Wu Hao @ 2017-04-05 12:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Moritz Fischer
Cc: atull, moritz.fischer, linux-fpga, linux-kernel, luwei.kang,
yi.z.zhang, Xiao Guangrong, Tim Whisonant, Enno Luebbers,
Shiva Rao, Christopher Rauer
On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 07:44:55PM -0700, Moritz Fischer wrote:
> Xiao,
>
> few nits inline, I'll need to come back to this once I went over the
> rest of the patchset ;-)
Sure, Thanks for your comments and review. :)
>
> On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 08:08:04PM +0800, Wu Hao wrote:
> > From: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
> >
> > Device Featuer List structure creates a link list of feature headers
> > within the MMIO space to provide an extensiable way of adding features.
> >
> > The Intel FPGA PCIe driver walks through the feature headers to enumerate
> > feature devices, FPGA Management Engine (FME) and FPGA Port for Accelerated
> > Function Unit (AFU), and their private sub features. For feature devices,
> > it creates the platform devices and linked the private sub features into
> > their platform data.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tim Whisonant <tim.whisonant@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Enno Luebbers <enno.luebbers@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Shiva Rao <shiva.rao@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Christopher Rauer <christopher.rauer@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Kang Luwei <luwei.kang@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.z.zhang@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Wu Hao <hao.wu@intel.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/fpga/intel/Makefile | 2 +-
> > drivers/fpga/intel/feature-dev.c | 139 +++++++
> > drivers/fpga/intel/feature-dev.h | 342 ++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/fpga/intel/pcie.c | 841 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > 4 files changed, 1321 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 drivers/fpga/intel/feature-dev.c
> > create mode 100644 drivers/fpga/intel/feature-dev.h
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/fpga/intel/Makefile b/drivers/fpga/intel/Makefile
> > index 61fd8ea..c029940 100644
> > --- a/drivers/fpga/intel/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/fpga/intel/Makefile
> > @@ -1,3 +1,3 @@
> > obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_FPGA_PCI) += intel-fpga-pci.o
> >
> > -intel-fpga-pci-objs := pcie.o
> > +intel-fpga-pci-objs := pcie.o feature-dev.o
> > diff --git a/drivers/fpga/intel/feature-dev.c b/drivers/fpga/intel/feature-dev.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..6952566
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/fpga/intel/feature-dev.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,139 @@
> > +/*
> > + * Intel FPGA Feature Device Driver
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (C) 2017 Intel Corporation, Inc.
> > + *
> > + * Authors:
> > + * Kang Luwei <luwei.kang@intel.com>
> > + * Zhang Yi <yi.z.zhang@intel.com>
> > + * Wu Hao <hao.wu@intel.com>
> > + * Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
> > + *
> > + * This work is licensed under a dual BSD/GPLv2 license. When using or
> > + * redistributing this file, you may do so under either license. See the
> > + * LICENSE.BSD file under this directory for the BSD license and see
> > + * the COPYING file in the top-level directory for the GPLv2 license.
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include "feature-dev.h"
> > +
> > +void feature_platform_data_add(struct feature_platform_data *pdata,
> > + int index, const char *name,
> > + int resource_index, void __iomem *ioaddr)
> > +{
> > + WARN_ON(index >= pdata->num);
> > +
> > + pdata->features[index].name = name;
> > + pdata->features[index].resource_index = resource_index;
> > + pdata->features[index].ioaddr = ioaddr;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int feature_platform_data_size(int num)
>
> static inline? num can be const
Sure. will fix this.
>
> > +{
> > + return sizeof(struct feature_platform_data) +
> > + num * sizeof(struct feature);
> > +}
> > +
> > +struct feature_platform_data *
> > +feature_platform_data_alloc_and_init(struct platform_device *dev, int num)
> > +{
> > + struct feature_platform_data *pdata;
> > +
> > + pdata = kzalloc(feature_platform_data_size(num), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (pdata) {
> > + pdata->dev = dev;
> > + pdata->num = num;
> > + mutex_init(&pdata->lock);
> > + }
> > +
> > + return pdata;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int fme_feature_num(void)
>
> is this used outside of this file? if not -> static
Yes, used in pcie.c
> > +{
> > + return FME_FEATURE_ID_MAX;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int port_feature_num(void)
>
> is this used outside of this file? if not -> static
Yes, used in pcie.c
> > +{
> > + return PORT_FEATURE_ID_MAX;
> > +}
> > +
> > +int fpga_port_id(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > + struct feature_port_header *port_hdr;
> > + struct feature_port_capability capability;
> > +
> > + port_hdr = get_feature_ioaddr_by_index(&pdev->dev,
> > + PORT_FEATURE_ID_HEADER);
> > + WARN_ON(!port_hdr);
> > +
> > + capability.csr = readq(&port_hdr->capability);
> > + return capability.port_number;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fpga_port_id);
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Enable Port by clear the port soft reset bit, which is set by default.
> > + * The User AFU is unable to respond to any MMIO access while in reset.
> > + * __fpga_port_enable function should only be used after __fpga_port_disable
> > + * function.
> > + */
> > +void __fpga_port_enable(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > + struct feature_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
> > + struct feature_port_header *port_hdr;
> > + struct feature_port_control control;
> > +
> > + WARN_ON(!pdata->disable_count);
> > +
> > + if (--pdata->disable_count != 0)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + port_hdr = get_feature_ioaddr_by_index(&pdev->dev,
> > + PORT_FEATURE_ID_HEADER);
> > + WARN_ON(!port_hdr);
> > +
> > + control.csr = readq(&port_hdr->control);
> > + control.port_sftrst = 0x0;
> > + writeq(control.csr, &port_hdr->control);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__fpga_port_enable);
> > +
> > +#define RST_POLL_INVL 10 /* us */
> > +#define RST_POLL_TIMEOUT 1000 /* us */
> > +
> > +int __fpga_port_disable(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > + struct feature_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
> > + struct feature_port_header *port_hdr;
> > + struct feature_port_control control;
> > +
> > + if (pdata->disable_count++ != 0)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + port_hdr = get_feature_ioaddr_by_index(&pdev->dev,
> > + PORT_FEATURE_ID_HEADER);
> > + WARN_ON(!port_hdr);
> > +
> > + /* Set port soft reset */
> > + control.csr = readq(&port_hdr->control);
> > + control.port_sftrst = 0x1;
> > + writeq(control.csr, &port_hdr->control);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * HW sets ack bit to 1 when all outstanding requests have been drained
> > + * on this port and minimum soft reset pulse width has elapsed.
> > + * Driver polls port_soft_reset_ack to determine if reset done by HW.
> > + */
> > + control.port_sftrst_ack = 1;
> > +
> > + if (fpga_wait_register_field(port_sftrst_ack, control,
> > + &port_hdr->control, RST_POLL_TIMEOUT, RST_POLL_INVL)) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "timeout, fail to reset device\n");
> > + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> > + }
>
> see iopoll comment above.
Yes, will fix this.
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__fpga_port_disable);
> > diff --git a/drivers/fpga/intel/feature-dev.h b/drivers/fpga/intel/feature-dev.h
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..a1e6e7d
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/fpga/intel/feature-dev.h
> > @@ -0,0 +1,342 @@
> > +/*
> > + * Intel FPGA Feature Device Driver Header File
> > + *
> > + * Copyright (C) 2017 Intel Corporation, Inc.
> > + *
> > + * Authors:
> > + * Kang Luwei <luwei.kang@intel.com>
> > + * Zhang Yi <yi.z.zhang@intel.com>
> > + * Wu Hao <hao.wu@intel.com>
> > + * Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
> > + *
> > + * This work is licensed under a dual BSD/GPLv2 license. When using or
> > + * redistributing this file, you may do so under either license. See the
> > + * LICENSE.BSD file under this directory for the BSD license and see
> > + * the COPYING file in the top-level directory for the GPLv2 license.
> > + */
> > +
> > +#ifndef __INTEL_FPGA_FEATURE_H
> > +#define __INTEL_FPGA_FEATURE_H
> > +
> > +#include <linux/fs.h>
> > +#include <linux/pci.h>
> > +#include <linux/uuid.h>
> > +#include <linux/delay.h>
> > +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > +
> > +/* maximum supported number of ports */
> > +#define MAX_FPGA_PORT_NUM 4
> > +/* plus one for fme device */
> > +#define MAX_FEATURE_DEV_NUM (MAX_FPGA_PORT_NUM + 1)
> > +
> > +#define FME_FEATURE_HEADER "fme_hdr"
> > +#define FME_FEATURE_THERMAL_MGMT "fme_thermal"
> > +#define FME_FEATURE_POWER_MGMT "fme_power"
> > +#define FME_FEATURE_GLOBAL_PERF "fme_gperf"
> > +#define FME_FEATURE_GLOBAL_ERR "fme_error"
> > +#define FME_FEATURE_PR_MGMT "fme_pr"
> > +
> > +#define PORT_FEATURE_HEADER "port_hdr"
> > +#define PORT_FEATURE_UAFU "port_uafu"
> > +#define PORT_FEATURE_ERR "port_err"
> > +#define PORT_FEATURE_UMSG "port_umsg"
> > +#define PORT_FEATURE_PR "port_pr"
> > +#define PORT_FEATURE_STP "port_stp"
> > +
> > +/* All headers and structures must be byte-packed to match the spec. */
> > +#pragma pack(1)
>
> I recall there being some controversy about this, can't remember which
> way people ended up deciding :)
It seems __packed is better?
> > +
> > +/* common header for all features */
> > +struct feature_header {
> > + union {
> > + u64 csr;
> > + struct {
> > + u16 id:12;
> > + u8 revision:4;
> > + u32 next_header_offset:24; /* offset to next header */
> > + u32 rsvdz:20;
> > + u8 type:4; /* feature type */
> > +#define FEATURE_TYPE_AFU 0x1
> > +#define FEATURE_TYPE_PRIVATE 0x3
> > + };
> > + };
> > +};
> > +
> > +/* common header for non-private features */
> > +struct feature_afu_header {
> > + uuid_le guid;
> > + union {
> > + u64 csr;
> > + struct {
> > + u64 next_afu:24; /* pointer to next afu header */
> > + u64 rsvdz:40;
> > + };
> > + };
> > +};
> > +
> > +/* FME Header Register Set */
> > +/* FME Capability Register */
> > +struct feature_fme_capability {
> > + union {
> > + u64 csr;
> > + struct {
> > + u8 fabric_verid; /* Fabric version ID */
> > + u8 socket_id:1; /* Socket id */
> > + u8 rsvdz1:3;
> > + u8 pcie0_link_avl:1; /* PCIe0 link availability */
> > + u8 pcie1_link_avl:1; /* PCIe1 link availability */
> > + u8 coherent_link_avl:1;/* Coherent link availability */
> > + u8 rsvdz2:1;
> > + u8 iommu_support:1; /* IOMMU or VT-d supported */
> > + u8 num_ports:3; /* Num of ports implemented */
> > + u8 rsvdz3:4;
> > + u8 addr_width_bits:6; /* Address width supported */
> > + u8 rsvdz4:2;
> > + u16 cache_size:12; /* Cache size in kb */
> > + u8 cache_assoc:4; /* Cache Associativity */
> > + u16 rsvdz5:15;
> > + u8 lock_bit:1; /* Latched lock bit by BIOS */
> > + };
> > + };
> > +};
> > +
> > +/* FME Port Offset Register */
> > +struct feature_fme_port {
> > + union {
> > + u64 csr;
> > + struct {
> > + u32 port_offset:24; /* Offset to port header */
> > + u8 rsvdz1;
> > + u8 port_bar:3; /* Bar id */
> > + u32 rsvdz2:20;
> > + u8 afu_access_ctrl:1; /* AFU access type: PF/VF */
> > + u8 rsvdz3:4;
> > + u8 port_implemented:1; /* Port implemented or not */
> > + u8 rsvdz4:3;
> > + };
> > + };
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct feature_fme_header {
> > + struct feature_header header;
> > + struct feature_afu_header afu_header;
> > + u64 rsvd[2];
> > + struct feature_fme_capability capability;
> > + struct feature_fme_port port[MAX_FPGA_PORT_NUM];
> > +};
> > +
> > +/* FME Thermal Sub Feature Register Set */
> > +struct feature_fme_thermal {
> > + struct feature_header header;
> > +};
> > +
> > +/* FME Power Sub Feature Register Set */
> > +struct feature_fme_power {
> > + struct feature_header header;
> > +};
> > +
> > +/* FME Global Performance Sub Feature Register Set */
> > +struct feature_fme_gperf {
> > + struct feature_header header;
> > +};
> > +
> > +/* FME Error Sub Feature Register Set */
> > +struct feature_fme_err {
> > + struct feature_header header;
> > +};
> > +
> > +/* FME Partial Reconfiguration Sub Feature Register Set */
> > +struct feature_fme_pr {
> > + struct feature_header header;
> > +};
> > +
> > +/* PORT Header Register Set */
> > +/* Port Capability Register */
> > +struct feature_port_capability {
> > + union {
> > + u64 csr;
> > + struct {
> > + u8 port_number:2; /* Port Number 0-3 */
> > + u8 rsvdz1:6;
> > + u16 mmio_size; /* User MMIO size in KB */
> > + u8 rsvdz2;
> > + u8 sp_intr_num:4; /* Supported interrupts num */
> > + u32 rsvdz3:28;
> > + };
> > + };
> > +};
> > +
> > +/* Port Control Register */
> > +struct feature_port_control {
> > + union {
> > + u64 csr;
> > + struct {
> > + u8 port_sftrst:1; /* Port Soft Reset */
> > + u8 rsvdz1:1;
> > + u8 latency_tolerance:1;/* '1' >= 40us, '0' < 40us */
> > + u8 rsvdz2:1;
> > + u8 port_sftrst_ack:1; /* HW ACK for Soft Reset */
> > + u64 rsvdz3:59;
> > + };
> > + };
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct feature_port_header {
> > + struct feature_header header;
> > + struct feature_afu_header afu_header;
> > + u64 rsvd[2];
> > + struct feature_port_capability capability;
> > + struct feature_port_control control;
> > +};
> > +
> > +/* PORT Error Sub Feature Register Set */
> > +struct feature_port_error {
> > + struct feature_header header;
> > +};
> > +
> > +/* PORT Unordered Message Sub Feature Register Set */
> > +struct feature_port_umsg {
> > + struct feature_header header;
> > +};
> > +
> > +/* PORT SignalTap Sub Feature Register Set */
> > +struct feature_port_stp {
> > + struct feature_header header;
> > +};
> > +
> > +#pragma pack()
> > +
> > +struct feature {
> > + const char *name;
> > + int resource_index;
> > + void __iomem *ioaddr;
> > +};
> > +
> > +struct feature_platform_data {
> > + /* list the feature dev to cci_drvdata->port_dev_list. */
> > + struct list_head node;
> > + struct mutex lock;
> > + struct platform_device *dev;
> > + unsigned int disable_count; /* count for port disable */
> > +
> > + int num; /* number of features */
> > + struct feature features[0];
> > +};
> > +
> > +enum fme_feature_id {
> > + FME_FEATURE_ID_HEADER = 0x0,
> > + FME_FEATURE_ID_THERMAL_MGMT = 0x1,
> > + FME_FEATURE_ID_POWER_MGMT = 0x2,
> > + FME_FEATURE_ID_GLOBAL_PERF = 0x3,
> > + FME_FEATURE_ID_GLOBAL_ERR = 0x4,
> > + FME_FEATURE_ID_PR_MGMT = 0x5,
> > + FME_FEATURE_ID_MAX = 0x6,
> > +};
> > +
> > +enum port_feature_id {
> > + PORT_FEATURE_ID_HEADER = 0x0,
> > + PORT_FEATURE_ID_ERROR = 0x1,
> > + PORT_FEATURE_ID_UMSG = 0x2,
> > + PORT_FEATURE_ID_PR = 0x3,
> > + PORT_FEATURE_ID_STP = 0x4,
> > + PORT_FEATURE_ID_UAFU = 0x5,
> > + PORT_FEATURE_ID_MAX = 0x6,
> > +};
> > +
> > +int fme_feature_num(void);
> > +int port_feature_num(void);
> > +
> > +#define FPGA_FEATURE_DEV_FME "intel-fpga-fme"
> > +#define FPGA_FEATURE_DEV_PORT "intel-fpga-port"
> > +
> > +void feature_platform_data_add(struct feature_platform_data *pdata,
> > + int index, const char *name,
> > + int resource_index, void __iomem *ioaddr);
> > +int feature_platform_data_size(int num);
> > +struct feature_platform_data *
> > +feature_platform_data_alloc_and_init(struct platform_device *dev, int num);
> > +
> > +int fpga_port_id(struct platform_device *pdev);
> > +
> > +static inline int fpga_port_check_id(struct platform_device *pdev,
> > + void *pport_id)
> > +{
> > + return fpga_port_id(pdev) == *(int *)pport_id;
> > +}
> > +
> > +void __fpga_port_enable(struct platform_device *pdev);
> > +int __fpga_port_disable(struct platform_device *pdev);
> > +
> > +static inline void fpga_port_enable(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > + struct feature_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&pdata->lock);
> > + __fpga_port_enable(pdev);
> > + mutex_unlock(&pdata->lock);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline int fpga_port_disable(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > + struct feature_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&pdata->lock);
> > + ret = __fpga_port_disable(pdev);
> > + mutex_unlock(&pdata->lock);
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline int __fpga_port_reset(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = __fpga_port_disable(pdev);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + __fpga_port_enable(pdev);
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline int fpga_port_reset(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > + struct feature_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev);
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&pdata->lock);
> > + ret = __fpga_port_reset(pdev);
> > + mutex_unlock(&pdata->lock);
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline void __iomem *
> > +get_feature_ioaddr_by_index(struct device *dev, int index)
> > +{
> > + struct feature_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(dev);
> > +
> > + return pdata->features[index].ioaddr;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * Wait register's _field to be changed to the given value (_expect's _field)
> > + * by polling with given interval and timeout.
> > + */
> > +#define fpga_wait_register_field(_field, _expect, _reg_addr, _timeout, _invl)\
> > +({ \
> > + int wait = 0; \
> > + int ret = -ETIMEDOUT; \
> > + typeof(_expect) value; \
> > + for (; wait <= _timeout; wait += _invl) { \
> > + value.csr = readq(_reg_addr); \
> > + if (_expect._field == value._field) { \
> > + ret = 0; \
> > + break; \
> > + } \
> > + udelay(_invl); \
> > + } \
> > + ret; \
> > +})
>
> can't you use iopoll and friends instead of this?
Yes, will fix this.
Thanks for the recommendation.
>
> > +
> > +#endif
> > diff --git a/drivers/fpga/intel/pcie.c b/drivers/fpga/intel/pcie.c
> > index 132d9da..28df63e 100644
> > --- a/drivers/fpga/intel/pcie.c
> > +++ b/drivers/fpga/intel/pcie.c
> > @@ -25,10 +25,827 @@
> > #include <linux/stddef.h>
> > #include <linux/errno.h>
> > #include <linux/aer.h>
> > +#include <linux/fpga/fpga-dev.h>
> > +
> > +#include "feature-dev.h"
> >
> > #define DRV_VERSION "EXPERIMENTAL VERSION"
> > #define DRV_NAME "intel-fpga-pci"
> >
> > +#define INTEL_FPGA_DEV "intel-fpga-dev"
> > +
> > +static DEFINE_MUTEX(fpga_id_mutex);
> > +
> > +enum fpga_id_type {
> > + FME_ID, /* fme id allocation and mapping */
> > + PORT_ID, /* port id allocation and mapping */
> > + FPGA_ID_MAX,
> > +};
> > +
> > +/* it is protected by fpga_id_mutex */
> > +static struct idr fpga_ids[FPGA_ID_MAX];
> > +
> > +struct cci_drvdata {
> > + struct device *fme_dev;
> > +
> > + struct mutex lock;
> > + struct list_head port_dev_list;
> > +
> > + struct list_head regions; /* global list of pci bar mapping region */
> > +};
> > +
> > +/* pci bar mapping info */
> > +struct cci_pci_region {
> > + int bar;
> > + void __iomem *ioaddr; /* pointer to mapped bar region */
> > + struct list_head node;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static void fpga_ids_init(void)
> > +{
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(fpga_ids); i++)
> > + idr_init(fpga_ids + i);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void fpga_ids_destroy(void)
> > +{
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(fpga_ids); i++)
> > + idr_destroy(fpga_ids + i);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int alloc_fpga_id(enum fpga_id_type type, struct device *dev)
> > +{
> > + int id;
> > +
> > + WARN_ON(type >= FPGA_ID_MAX);
> > + mutex_lock(&fpga_id_mutex);
> > + id = idr_alloc(fpga_ids + type, dev, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
> > + mutex_unlock(&fpga_id_mutex);
> > + return id;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void free_fpga_id(enum fpga_id_type type, int id)
> > +{
> > + WARN_ON(type >= FPGA_ID_MAX);
> > + mutex_lock(&fpga_id_mutex);
> > + idr_remove(fpga_ids + type, id);
> > + mutex_unlock(&fpga_id_mutex);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void cci_pci_add_port_dev(struct pci_dev *pdev,
> > + struct platform_device *port_dev)
> > +{
> > + struct cci_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
> > + struct feature_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(&port_dev->dev);
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&drvdata->lock);
> > + list_add(&pdata->node, &drvdata->port_dev_list);
> > + get_device(&pdata->dev->dev);
> > + mutex_unlock(&drvdata->lock);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void cci_pci_remove_port_devs(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > +{
> > + struct cci_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
> > + struct feature_platform_data *pdata, *ptmp;
> > +
> > + mutex_lock(&drvdata->lock);
> > + list_for_each_entry_safe(pdata, ptmp, &drvdata->port_dev_list, node) {
> > + struct platform_device *port_dev = pdata->dev;
> > +
> > + /* the port should be unregistered first. */
> > + WARN_ON(device_is_registered(&port_dev->dev));
> > + list_del(&pdata->node);
> > + free_fpga_id(PORT_ID, port_dev->id);
> > + put_device(&port_dev->dev);
> > + }
> > + mutex_unlock(&drvdata->lock);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* info collection during feature dev build. */
> > +struct build_feature_devs_info {
> > + struct pci_dev *pdev;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * PCI BAR mapping info. Parsing feature list starts from
> > + * BAR 0 and switch to different BARs to parse Port
> > + */
> > + void __iomem *ioaddr;
> > + void __iomem *ioend;
> > + int current_bar;
> > +
> > + /* points to FME header where the port offset is figured out. */
> > + void __iomem *pfme_hdr;
> > +
> > + /* the container device for all feature devices */
> > + struct fpga_dev *parent_dev;
> > +
> > + /* current feature device */
> > + struct platform_device *feature_dev;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static void cci_pci_release_regions(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > +{
> > + struct cci_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
> > + struct cci_pci_region *tmp, *region;
> > +
> > + list_for_each_entry_safe(region, tmp, &drvdata->regions, node) {
> > + list_del(®ion->node);
> > + if (region->ioaddr)
> > + pci_iounmap(pdev, region->ioaddr);
> > + devm_kfree(&pdev->dev, region);
> > + }
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void __iomem *cci_pci_ioremap_bar(struct pci_dev *pdev, int bar)
> > +{
> > + struct cci_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
> > + struct cci_pci_region *region;
> > +
> > + list_for_each_entry(region, &drvdata->regions, node)
> > + if (region->bar == bar) {
> > + dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "BAR %d region exists\n", bar);
> > + return region->ioaddr;
> > + }
> > +
> > + region = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*region), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!region)
> > + return NULL;
> > +
> > + region->bar = bar;
> > + region->ioaddr = pci_ioremap_bar(pdev, bar);
> > + if (!region->ioaddr) {
> > + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "can't ioremap memory from BAR %d.\n", bar);
> > + devm_kfree(&pdev->dev, region);
> > + return NULL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + list_add(®ion->node, &drvdata->regions);
> > + return region->ioaddr;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int parse_start_from(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo, int bar)
> > +{
> > + binfo->ioaddr = cci_pci_ioremap_bar(binfo->pdev, bar);
> > + if (!binfo->ioaddr)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + binfo->current_bar = bar;
> > + binfo->ioend = binfo->ioaddr + pci_resource_len(binfo->pdev, bar);
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int parse_start(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo)
> > +{
> > + /* fpga feature list starts from BAR 0 */
> > + return parse_start_from(binfo, 0);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/* switch the memory mapping to BAR# @bar */
> > +static int parse_switch_to(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo, int bar)
> > +{
> > + return parse_start_from(binfo, bar);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static struct build_feature_devs_info *
> > +build_info_alloc_and_init(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > +{
> > + struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo;
> > +
> > + binfo = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*binfo), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (binfo)
> > + binfo->pdev = pdev;
> > +
> > + return binfo;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static enum fpga_id_type feature_dev_id_type(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > + if (!strcmp(pdev->name, FPGA_FEATURE_DEV_FME))
> > + return FME_ID;
> > +
> > + if (!strcmp(pdev->name, FPGA_FEATURE_DEV_PORT))
> > + return PORT_ID;
> > +
> > + WARN_ON(1);
> > + return FPGA_ID_MAX;
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * register current feature device, it is called when we need to switch to
> > + * another feature parsing or we have parsed all features
> > + */
> > +static int build_info_commit_dev(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + if (!binfo->feature_dev)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + ret = platform_device_add(binfo->feature_dev);
> > + if (!ret) {
> > + struct cci_drvdata *drvdata;
> > +
> > + drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(&binfo->pdev->dev);
> > + if (feature_dev_id_type(binfo->feature_dev) == PORT_ID)
> > + cci_pci_add_port_dev(binfo->pdev, binfo->feature_dev);
> > + else
> > + drvdata->fme_dev = get_device(&binfo->feature_dev->dev);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * reset it to avoid build_info_free() freeing their resource.
> > + *
> > + * The resource of successfully registered feature devices
> > + * will be freed by platform_device_unregister(). See the
> > + * comments in build_info_create_dev().
> > + */
> > + binfo->feature_dev = NULL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int
> > +build_info_create_dev(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo,
> > + enum fpga_id_type type, int feature_nr, const char *name)
> > +{
> > + struct platform_device *fdev;
> > + struct resource *res;
> > + struct feature_platform_data *pdata;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + /* we will create a new device, commit current device first */
> > + ret = build_info_commit_dev(binfo);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * we use -ENODEV as the initialization indicator which indicates
> > + * whether the id need to be reclaimed
> > + */
> > + fdev = binfo->feature_dev = platform_device_alloc(name, -ENODEV);
> > + if (!fdev)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + fdev->id = alloc_fpga_id(type, &fdev->dev);
> > + if (fdev->id < 0)
> > + return fdev->id;
> > +
> > + fdev->dev.parent = &binfo->parent_dev->dev;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * we need not care the memory which is associated with the
> we do not need to care *for* the memory ;-)
> > + * platform device. After call platform_device_unregister(),
> After calling ...
Will fix them. Thanks.
> > + * it will be automatically freed by device's
> > + * release() callback, platform_device_release().
> > + */
> > + pdata = feature_platform_data_alloc_and_init(fdev, feature_nr);
> > + if (!pdata)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * the count should be initialized to 0 to make sure
> > + *__fpga_port_enable() following __fpga_port_disable()
> > + * works properly for port device.
> > + * and it should always be 0 for fme device.
> > + */
> > + WARN_ON(pdata->disable_count);
> > +
> > + fdev->dev.platform_data = pdata;
> > + fdev->num_resources = feature_nr;
> > + fdev->resource = kcalloc(feature_nr, sizeof(*res), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!fdev->resource)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int remove_feature_dev(struct device *dev, void *data)
> > +{
> > + struct platform_device *pdev = to_platform_device(dev);
> > +
> > + platform_device_unregister(pdev);
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int remove_parent_dev(struct device *dev, void *data)
> > +{
> > + /* remove platform devices attached in the parent device */
> > + device_for_each_child(dev, NULL, remove_feature_dev);
> > + fpga_dev_destroy(to_fpga_dev(dev));
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void remove_all_devs(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > +{
> > + /* remove parent device and all its children. */
> > + device_for_each_child(&pdev->dev, NULL, remove_parent_dev);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void build_info_free(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo)
> > +{
> > + if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(binfo->parent_dev))
> > + remove_all_devs(binfo->pdev);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * it is a valid id, free it. See comments in
> > + * build_info_create_dev()
> > + */
> > + if (binfo->feature_dev && binfo->feature_dev->id >= 0)
> > + free_fpga_id(feature_dev_id_type(binfo->feature_dev),
> > + binfo->feature_dev->id);
> > +
> > + platform_device_put(binfo->feature_dev);
> > +
> > + devm_kfree(&binfo->pdev->dev, binfo);
> > +}
> > +
> > +#define FEATURE_TYPE_AFU 0x1
> > +#define FEATURE_TYPE_PRIVATE 0x3
> > +
> > +/* FME and PORT GUID are fixed */
> > +#define FEATURE_FME_GUID "f9e17764-38f0-82fe-e346-524ae92aafbf"
> > +#define FEATURE_PORT_GUID "6b355b87-b06c-9642-eb42-8d139398b43a"
> > +
> > +static bool feature_is_fme(struct feature_afu_header *afu_hdr)
> > +{
> > + uuid_le u;
> > +
> > + uuid_le_to_bin(FEATURE_FME_GUID, &u);
> > +
> > + return !uuid_le_cmp(u, afu_hdr->guid);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static bool feature_is_port(struct feature_afu_header *afu_hdr)
> > +{
> > + uuid_le u;
> > +
> > + uuid_le_to_bin(FEATURE_PORT_GUID, &u);
> > +
> > + return !uuid_le_cmp(u, afu_hdr->guid);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * UAFU GUID is dynamic as it can be changed after FME downloads different
> > + * Green Bitstream to the port, so we treat the unknown GUIDs which are
> > + * attached on port's feature list as UAFU.
> > + */
> > +static bool feature_is_UAFU(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo)
> > +{
> > + if (!binfo->feature_dev ||
> > + feature_dev_id_type(binfo->feature_dev) != PORT_ID)
> > + return false;
> > +
> > + return true;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void
> > +build_info_add_sub_feature(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo,
> > + int feature_id, const char *feature_name,
> > + resource_size_t resource_size, void __iomem *start)
> > +{
> > +
> > + struct platform_device *fdev = binfo->feature_dev;
> > + struct feature_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(&fdev->dev);
> > + struct resource *res = &fdev->resource[feature_id];
> > +
> > + res->start = pci_resource_start(binfo->pdev, binfo->current_bar) +
> > + start - binfo->ioaddr;
> > + res->end = res->start + resource_size - 1;
> > + res->flags = IORESOURCE_MEM;
> > + res->name = feature_name;
> > +
> > + feature_platform_data_add(pdata, feature_id,
> > + feature_name, feature_id, start);
> > +}
> > +
> > +struct feature_info {
> > + const char *name;
> > + resource_size_t resource_size;
> > + int feature_index;
> > +};
> > +
> > +/* indexed by fme feature IDs which are defined in 'enum fme_feature_id'. */
> > +static struct feature_info fme_features[] = {
> > + {
> > + .name = FME_FEATURE_HEADER,
> > + .resource_size = sizeof(struct feature_fme_header),
> > + .feature_index = FME_FEATURE_ID_HEADER,
> > + },
> > + {
> > + .name = FME_FEATURE_THERMAL_MGMT,
> > + .resource_size = sizeof(struct feature_fme_thermal),
> > + .feature_index = FME_FEATURE_ID_THERMAL_MGMT,
> > + },
> > + {
> > + .name = FME_FEATURE_POWER_MGMT,
> > + .resource_size = sizeof(struct feature_fme_power),
> > + .feature_index = FME_FEATURE_ID_POWER_MGMT,
> > + },
> > + {
> > + .name = FME_FEATURE_GLOBAL_PERF,
> > + .resource_size = sizeof(struct feature_fme_gperf),
> > + .feature_index = FME_FEATURE_ID_GLOBAL_PERF,
> > + },
> > + {
> > + .name = FME_FEATURE_GLOBAL_ERR,
> > + .resource_size = sizeof(struct feature_fme_err),
> > + .feature_index = FME_FEATURE_ID_GLOBAL_ERR,
> > + },
> > + {
> > + .name = FME_FEATURE_PR_MGMT,
> > + .resource_size = sizeof(struct feature_fme_pr),
> > + .feature_index = FME_FEATURE_ID_PR_MGMT,
> > + }
> > +};
> > +
> > +/* indexed by port feature IDs which are defined in 'enum port_feature_id'. */
> > +static struct feature_info port_features[] = {
>
> Could probably be const
The resource_size will be updated during the enumeration.
Driver reads register to know the MMIO region size for accelerator.
Thanks
Hao
> > + {
> > + .name = PORT_FEATURE_HEADER,
> > + .resource_size = sizeof(struct feature_port_header),
> > + .feature_index = PORT_FEATURE_ID_HEADER,
> > + },
> > + {
> > + .name = PORT_FEATURE_ERR,
> > + .resource_size = sizeof(struct feature_port_error),
> > + .feature_index = PORT_FEATURE_ID_ERROR,
> > + },
> > + {
> > + .name = PORT_FEATURE_UMSG,
> > + .resource_size = sizeof(struct feature_port_umsg),
> > + .feature_index = PORT_FEATURE_ID_UMSG,
> > + },
> > + {
> > + /* This feature isn't available for now */
> > + .name = PORT_FEATURE_PR,
> > + .resource_size = 0,
> > + .feature_index = PORT_FEATURE_ID_PR,
> > + },
> > + {
> > + .name = PORT_FEATURE_STP,
> > + .resource_size = sizeof(struct feature_port_stp),
> > + .feature_index = PORT_FEATURE_ID_STP,
> > + },
> > + {
> > + /*
> > + * For User AFU feature, its region size is not fixed, but
> > + * reported by register PortCapability.mmio_size. Resource
> > + * size of UAFU will be set while parse port device.
> > + */
> > + .name = PORT_FEATURE_UAFU,
> > + .resource_size = 0,
> > + .feature_index = PORT_FEATURE_ID_UAFU,
> > + },
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int
> > +create_feature_instance(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo,
> > + void __iomem *start, struct feature_info *finfo)
> > +{
> > + if (binfo->ioend - start < finfo->resource_size)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + build_info_add_sub_feature(binfo, finfo->feature_index, finfo->name,
> > + finfo->resource_size, start);
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int parse_feature_fme(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo,
> > + void __iomem *start)
> > +{
> > + struct cci_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(&binfo->pdev->dev);
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = build_info_create_dev(binfo, FME_ID, fme_feature_num(),
> > + FPGA_FEATURE_DEV_FME);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + if (drvdata->fme_dev) {
> > + dev_err(&binfo->pdev->dev, "Multiple FMEs are detected.\n");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return create_feature_instance(binfo, start,
> > + &fme_features[FME_FEATURE_ID_HEADER]);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int parse_feature_fme_private(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo,
> > + struct feature_header *hdr)
> > +{
> > + struct feature_header header;
> > +
> > + header.csr = readq(hdr);
> > +
> > + if (header.id >= ARRAY_SIZE(fme_features)) {
> > + dev_info(&binfo->pdev->dev, "FME feature id %x is not supported yet.\n",
> > + header.id);
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return create_feature_instance(binfo, hdr, &fme_features[header.id]);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int parse_feature_port(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo,
> > + void __iomem *start)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = build_info_create_dev(binfo, PORT_ID, port_feature_num(),
> > + FPGA_FEATURE_DEV_PORT);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + return create_feature_instance(binfo, start,
> > + &port_features[PORT_FEATURE_ID_HEADER]);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void enable_port_uafu(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo,
> > + void __iomem *start)
> > +{
> > + enum port_feature_id id = PORT_FEATURE_ID_UAFU;
> > + struct feature_port_header *port_hdr;
> > + struct feature_port_capability capability;
> > +
> > + port_hdr = (struct feature_port_header *)start;
> > + capability.csr = readq(&port_hdr->capability);
> > + port_features[id].resource_size = capability.mmio_size << 10;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * To enable User AFU, driver needs to clear reset bit on related port,
> > + * otherwise the mmio space of this user AFU will be invalid.
> > + */
> > + if (port_features[id].resource_size)
> > + fpga_port_reset(binfo->feature_dev);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int parse_feature_port_private(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo,
> > + struct feature_header *hdr)
> > +{
> > + struct feature_header header;
> > + enum port_feature_id id;
> > +
> > + header.csr = readq(hdr);
> > + /*
> > + * the region of port feature id is [0x10, 0x13], + 1 to reserve 0
> > + * which is dedicated for port-hdr.
> > + */
> > + id = (header.id & 0x000f) + 1;
> > +
> > + if (id >= ARRAY_SIZE(port_features)) {
> > + dev_info(&binfo->pdev->dev, "Port feature id %x is not supported yet.\n",
> > + header.id);
> > + return 0;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return create_feature_instance(binfo, hdr, &port_features[id]);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int parse_feature_port_uafu(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo,
> > + struct feature_header *hdr)
> > +{
> > + enum port_feature_id id = PORT_FEATURE_ID_UAFU;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + if (port_features[id].resource_size) {
> > + ret = create_feature_instance(binfo, hdr, &port_features[id]);
> > + port_features[id].resource_size = 0;
> > + } else {
> > + dev_err(&binfo->pdev->dev, "the uafu feature header is mis-configured.\n");
> > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int parse_feature_afus(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo,
> > + struct feature_header *hdr)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > + struct feature_afu_header *afu_hdr, header;
> > + void __iomem *start;
> > + void __iomem *end = binfo->ioend;
> > +
> > + start = hdr;
> > + for (; start < end; start += header.next_afu) {
> > + if (end - start < (sizeof(*afu_hdr) + sizeof(*hdr)))
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + hdr = start;
> > + afu_hdr = (struct feature_afu_header *) (hdr + 1);
> > + header.csr = readq(&afu_hdr->csr);
> > +
> > + if (feature_is_fme(afu_hdr)) {
> > + ret = parse_feature_fme(binfo, hdr);
> > + binfo->pfme_hdr = hdr;
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > + } else if (feature_is_port(afu_hdr)) {
> > + ret = parse_feature_port(binfo, hdr);
> > + enable_port_uafu(binfo, hdr);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > + } else if (feature_is_UAFU(binfo)) {
> > + ret = parse_feature_port_uafu(binfo, hdr);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > + } else
> > + dev_info(&binfo->pdev->dev, "AFU GUID %pUl is not supported yet.\n",
> > + afu_hdr->guid.b);
> > +
> > + if (!header.next_afu)
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int parse_feature_private(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo,
> > + struct feature_header *hdr)
> > +{
> > + struct feature_header header;
> > +
> > + header.csr = readq(hdr);
> > +
> > + if (!binfo->feature_dev) {
> > + dev_err(&binfo->pdev->dev, "the private feature %x does not belong to any AFU.\n",
> > + header.id);
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + switch (feature_dev_id_type(binfo->feature_dev)) {
> > + case FME_ID:
> > + return parse_feature_fme_private(binfo, hdr);
> > + case PORT_ID:
> > + return parse_feature_port_private(binfo, hdr);
> > + default:
> > + dev_info(&binfo->pdev->dev, "private feature %x belonging to AFU %s is not supported yet.\n",
> > + header.id, binfo->feature_dev->name);
> > + }
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int parse_feature(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo,
> > + struct feature_header *hdr)
> > +{
> > + struct feature_header header;
> > + int ret = 0;
> > +
> > + header.csr = readq(hdr);
> > +
> > + switch (header.type) {
> > + case FEATURE_TYPE_AFU:
> > + ret = parse_feature_afus(binfo, hdr);
> > + break;
> > + case FEATURE_TYPE_PRIVATE:
> > + ret = parse_feature_private(binfo, hdr);
> > + break;
> > + default:
> > + dev_info(&binfo->pdev->dev,
> > + "Feature Type %x is not supported.\n", hdr->type);
> > + };
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int
> > +parse_feature_list(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo, void __iomem *start)
> > +{
> > + struct feature_header *hdr, header;
> > + void __iomem *end = binfo->ioend;
> > + int ret = 0;
> > +
> > + for (; start < end; start += header.next_header_offset) {
> > + if (end - start < sizeof(*hdr)) {
> > + dev_err(&binfo->pdev->dev, "The region is too small to contain a feature.\n");
> > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > + hdr = (struct feature_header *)start;
> > + ret = parse_feature(binfo, hdr);
> > + if (ret)
> > + break;
> > +
> > + header.csr = readq(hdr);
> > + if (!header.next_header_offset)
> > + break;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int parse_ports_from_fme(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo)
> > +{
> > + struct feature_fme_header *fme_hdr;
> > + struct feature_fme_port port;
> > + int i = 0, ret = 0;
> > +
> > + if (binfo->pfme_hdr == NULL) {
> > + dev_dbg(&binfo->pdev->dev, "VF is detected.\n");
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + fme_hdr = binfo->pfme_hdr;
> > +
> > + do {
> > + port.csr = readq(&fme_hdr->port[i]);
> > + if (!port.port_implemented)
> > + break;
> > +
> > + ret = parse_switch_to(binfo, port.port_bar);
> > + if (ret)
> > + break;
> > +
> > + ret = parse_feature_list(binfo,
> > + binfo->ioaddr + port.port_offset);
> > + if (ret)
> > + break;
> > + } while (++i < MAX_FPGA_PORT_NUM);
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int create_init_drvdata(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > +{
> > + struct cci_drvdata *drvdata;
> > +
> > + drvdata = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*drvdata), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!drvdata)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + mutex_init(&drvdata->lock);
> > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&drvdata->port_dev_list);
> > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&drvdata->regions);
> > +
> > + dev_set_drvdata(&pdev->dev, drvdata);
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void destroy_drvdata(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > +{
> > + struct cci_drvdata *drvdata = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
> > +
> > + if (drvdata->fme_dev) {
> > + /* fme device should be unregistered first. */
> > + WARN_ON(device_is_registered(drvdata->fme_dev));
> > + free_fpga_id(FME_ID, to_platform_device(drvdata->fme_dev)->id);
> > + put_device(drvdata->fme_dev);
> > + }
> > +
> > + cci_pci_remove_port_devs(pdev);
> > + cci_pci_release_regions(pdev);
> > + dev_set_drvdata(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> > + devm_kfree(&pdev->dev, drvdata);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int cci_pci_create_feature_devs(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > +{
> > + struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + binfo = build_info_alloc_and_init(pdev);
> > + if (!binfo)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + binfo->parent_dev = fpga_dev_create(&pdev->dev, INTEL_FPGA_DEV);
> > + if (IS_ERR(binfo->parent_dev)) {
> > + ret = PTR_ERR(binfo->parent_dev);
> > + goto free_binfo_exit;
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret = parse_start(binfo);
> > + if (ret)
> > + goto free_binfo_exit;
> > +
> > + ret = parse_feature_list(binfo, binfo->ioaddr);
> > + if (ret)
> > + goto free_binfo_exit;
> > +
> > + ret = parse_ports_from_fme(binfo);
> > + if (ret)
> > + goto free_binfo_exit;
> > +
> > + ret = build_info_commit_dev(binfo);
> > + if (ret)
> > + goto free_binfo_exit;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * everything is okay, reset ->parent_dev to stop it being
> > + * freed by build_info_free()
> > + */
> > + binfo->parent_dev = NULL;
> > +
> > +free_binfo_exit:
> > + build_info_free(binfo);
> > + return ret;
> > +}
> > +
> > /* PCI Device ID */
> > #define PCIe_DEVICE_ID_PF_INT_5_X 0xBCBD
> > #define PCIe_DEVICE_ID_PF_INT_6_X 0xBCC0
> > @@ -83,9 +900,18 @@ int cci_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pcidev, const struct pci_device_id *pcidevid)
> > goto release_region_exit;
> > }
> >
> > - /* TODO: create and add the platform device per feature list */
> > + ret = create_init_drvdata(pcidev);
> > + if (ret)
> > + goto release_region_exit;
> > +
> > + ret = cci_pci_create_feature_devs(pcidev);
> > + if (ret)
> > + goto destroy_drvdata_exit;
> > +
> > return 0;
> >
> > +destroy_drvdata_exit:
> > + destroy_drvdata(pcidev);
> > release_region_exit:
> > pci_release_regions(pcidev);
> > disable_error_report_exit:
> > @@ -97,6 +923,8 @@ int cci_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pcidev, const struct pci_device_id *pcidevid)
> >
> > static void cci_pci_remove(struct pci_dev *pcidev)
> > {
> > + remove_all_devs(pcidev);
> > + destroy_drvdata(pcidev);
> > pci_release_regions(pcidev);
> > pci_disable_pcie_error_reporting(pcidev);
> > pci_disable_device(pcidev);
> > @@ -111,14 +939,23 @@ static struct pci_driver cci_pci_driver = {
> >
> > static int __init ccidrv_init(void)
> > {
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > pr_info("Intel(R) FPGA PCIe Driver: Version %s\n", DRV_VERSION);
> >
> > - return pci_register_driver(&cci_pci_driver);
> > + fpga_ids_init();
> > +
> > + ret = pci_register_driver(&cci_pci_driver);
> > + if (ret)
> > + fpga_ids_destroy();
> > +
> > + return ret;
> > }
> >
> > static void __exit ccidrv_exit(void)
> > {
> > pci_unregister_driver(&cci_pci_driver);
> > + fpga_ids_destroy();
> > }
> >
> > module_init(ccidrv_init);
> > --
> > 2.7.4
> >
>
> Thanks,
>
> Moritz
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH 03/16] fpga: intel: add FPGA PCIe device driver
2017-04-04 2:10 ` [PATCH 03/16] fpga: intel: add FPGA PCIe device driver Moritz Fischer
@ 2017-04-05 13:14 ` Wu, Hao
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Wu, Hao @ 2017-04-05 13:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Moritz Fischer
Cc: atull@kernel.org, moritz.fischer@ettus.com,
linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Kang, Luwei, Zhang, Yi Z, Whisonant, Tim, Luebbers, Enno, Rao, ,
Christopher, Xiao Guangrong, Wu, Hao
> > +#include <linux/pci.h>
> > +#include <linux/types.h>
> > +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/stddef.h>
> > +#include <linux/errno.h>
> > +#include <linux/aer.h>
> > +
> > +#define DRV_VERSION "EXPERIMENTAL VERSION"
>
> Is that a leftover? :)
Sorry, will fix this.
> > +#define DRV_NAME "intel-fpga-pci"
> > +
> > +/* PCI Device ID */
> > +#define PCIe_DEVICE_ID_PF_INT_5_X 0xBCBD
> > +#define PCIe_DEVICE_ID_PF_INT_6_X 0xBCC0
> > +#define PCIe_DEVICE_ID_PF_DSC_1_X 0x09C4
> > +/* VF Device */
> > +#define PCIe_DEVICE_ID_VF_INT_5_X 0xBCBF
> > +#define PCIe_DEVICE_ID_VF_INT_6_X 0xBCC1
> > +#define PCIe_DEVICE_ID_VF_DSC_1_X 0x09C5
> > +
> > +static struct pci_device_id cci_pcie_id_tbl[] = {
> > + {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCIe_DEVICE_ID_PF_INT_5_X),},
> > + {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCIe_DEVICE_ID_VF_INT_5_X),},
> > + {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCIe_DEVICE_ID_PF_INT_6_X),},
> > + {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCIe_DEVICE_ID_VF_INT_6_X),},
> > + {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCIe_DEVICE_ID_PF_DSC_1_X),},
> > + {PCI_DEVICE(PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, PCIe_DEVICE_ID_VF_DSC_1_X),},
> > + {0,}
> > +};
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(pci, cci_pcie_id_tbl);
> > +
> > +static
> > +int cci_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pcidev, const struct pci_device_id *pcidevid)
> > +{
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = pci_enable_device(pcidev);
> > + if (ret < 0) {
> > + dev_err(&pcidev->dev, "Failed to enable device %d.\n", ret);
> > + goto exit;
> Why not 'return ret' here ?
Yes, you are right, will fix this.
> > + }
> > +
> > + ret = pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting(pcidev);
> > + if (ret && ret != -EINVAL)
> > + dev_info(&pcidev->dev, "PCIE AER unavailable %d.\n", ret);
>
> What if it is EINVAL?
pci_enable_pcie_error_reporting is always return -EINVAL when CONFIG_PCIEAER is not selected.
Then we don't need this boring message. : )
>
> > +
> > + ret = pci_request_regions(pcidev, DRV_NAME);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + dev_err(&pcidev->dev, "Failed to request regions.\n");
> > + goto disable_error_report_exit;
> > + }
> > +
> > + pci_set_master(pcidev);
> > + pci_save_state(pcidev);
> > +
> > + if (!dma_set_mask(&pcidev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64))) {
> > + dma_set_coherent_mask(&pcidev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(64));
> > + } else if (!dma_set_mask(&pcidev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32))) {
> > + dma_set_coherent_mask(&pcidev->dev, DMA_BIT_MASK(32));
> > + } else {
> > + ret = -EIO;
> > + dev_err(&pcidev->dev, "No suitable DMA support available.\n");
> > + goto release_region_exit;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* TODO: create and add the platform device per feature list */
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > +release_region_exit:
> > + pci_release_regions(pcidev);
> > +disable_error_report_exit:
> > + pci_disable_pcie_error_reporting(pcidev);
> > + pci_disable_device(pcidev);
> > +exit:
> > + return ret;
> If you return as suggested above, this can go away.
Yes, you are right. Will fix this in next version.
Thanks a lot for your review and comments. : )
Hao
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH 01/16] docs: fpga: add a document for Intel FPGA driver overview
2017-04-02 14:41 ` [PATCH 01/16] docs: fpga: add a document for Intel FPGA driver overview Moritz Fischer
2017-04-03 20:44 ` Alan Tull
2017-04-04 5:06 ` Wu Hao
@ 2017-04-11 18:02 ` Alan Tull
2017-04-12 3:22 ` Wu, Hao
2 siblings, 1 reply; 11+ messages in thread
From: Alan Tull @ 2017-04-11 18:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Moritz Fischer
Cc: Wu Hao, matthew.gerlach, Moritz Fischer, linux-fpga, linux-kernel,
Kang, Luwei, Zhang, Yi Z, Enno Luebbers, Xiao Guangrong
On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 9:41 AM, Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 01, 2017 at 07:16:19PM +0800, Wu Hao wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 01:38:06PM -0500, Alan Tull wrote:
>> > On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 1:24 PM, <matthew.gerlach@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > On Thu, 30 Mar 2017, Wu Hao wrote:
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Hi Wu Hao,
>> > >
>> > > Great documentation. I'm looking forward to diving into the rest of the
>> > > patches. Please see my comments inline.
>> > >
>> > > Matthew Gerlach
>> > >
>> > >
>> > >> Add a document for Intel FPGA driver overview.
>> > >>
>> > >> Signed-off-by: Enno Luebbers <enno.luebbers@intel.com>
>> > >> Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
>> > >> Signed-off-by: Wu Hao <hao.wu@intel.com>
>> > >> ---
>> > >> Documentation/fpga/intel-fpga.txt | 259
>> > >> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> > >> 1 file changed, 259 insertions(+)
>> > >> create mode 100644 Documentation/fpga/intel-fpga.txt
>> > >>
>> > >> diff --git a/Documentation/fpga/intel-fpga.txt
>> > >> b/Documentation/fpga/intel-fpga.txt
>> > >> new file mode 100644
>> > >> index 0000000..9396cea
>> > >> --- /dev/null
>> > >> +++ b/Documentation/fpga/intel-fpga.txt
>> > >> @@ -0,0 +1,259 @@
>> > >>
>> > >> +===============================================================================
>> > >> + Intel FPGA driver Overview
>> > >>
>> > >> +-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > >> + Enno Luebbers <enno.luebbers@intel.com>
>> > >> + Xiao Guangrong <guangrong.xiao@linux.intel.com>
>> > >> + Wu Hao <hao.wu@intel.com>
>> > >> +
>> > >> +The Intel FPGA driver provides interfaces for userspace applications to
>> > >> +configure, enumerate, open, and access FPGA accelerators on platforms
>> > >> equipped
>> > >> +with Intel(R) FPGA solutions and enables system level management
>> > >> functions such
>> > >> +as FPGA reconfiguration, power management, and virtualization.
>> > >> +
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > From a Linux kernel perspective, I'm not sure this is the best name for
>> > > this code. The name gives me the impression that it is a driver for all
>> > > Intel FPGAs, but not all Intel FPGAs are connected to the processor over a
>> > > PCIe bus. The processor could be directely connected like the Arria10
>> > > SOCFPGA. Such a processor could certainly benefit from this accelerator
>> > > usage model. In an extreme case, couldn't a processor in the FPGA,
>> > > running Linux, also benefit from this accelerator model? Is this code a
>> > > "FPGA Accelerator Framework"?
>> > >
>> > >> +HW Architecture
>> > >> +===============
>> > >> +From the OS's point of view, the FPGA hardware appears as a regular PCIe
>> > >> device.
>> > >> +The FPGA device memory is organized using a predefined data structure
>> > >> (Device
>> > >> +Feature List). Features supported by the particular FPGA device are
>> > >> exposed
>> > >> +through these data structures, as illustrated below:
>> > >> +
>> > >> + +-------------------------------+ +-------------+
>> > >> + | PF | | VF |
>> > >> + +-------------------------------+ +-------------+
>> > >> + ^ ^ ^ ^
>> > >> + | | | |
>> > >> ++-----|------------|---------|--------------|-------+
>> > >> +| | | | | |
>> > >> +| +-----+ +-------+ +-------+ +-------+ |
>> > >> +| | FME | | Port0 | | Port1 | | Port2 | |
>> > >> +| +-----+ +-------+ +-------+ +-------+ |
>> > >> +| ^ ^ ^ |
>> > >> +| | | | |
>> > >> +| +-------+ +------+ +-------+ |
>> > >> +| | AFU | | AFU | | AFU | |
>> > >> +| +-------+ +------+ +-------+ |
>> > >> +| |
>> > >> +| FPGA PCIe Device |
>> > >> ++---------------------------------------------------+
>> > >> +
>> > >> +The driver supports PCIe SR-IOV to create virtual functions (VFs) which
>> > >> can be
>> > >> +used to assign individual accelerators to virtual machines .
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Does this HW Architecture require an Intel FPGA? Couldn't any vendors FPGA
>> > > be used as long as it presented itself the PCIe bus the same and contained
>> > > an appropriate Device Feature List?
>
> I think this is a good (and important) point. Especially when sysfs
> entries & ioctls constituting ABI depend on it.
Please cc linux-api@vger.kernel.org on your next version of this as
linux/Documentation/process/adding-syscalls.rst specifies for new system calls.
Alan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
* RE: [PATCH 01/16] docs: fpga: add a document for Intel FPGA driver overview
2017-04-11 18:02 ` Alan Tull
@ 2017-04-12 3:22 ` Wu, Hao
0 siblings, 0 replies; 11+ messages in thread
From: Wu, Hao @ 2017-04-12 3:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Alan Tull, Moritz Fischer
Cc: matthew.gerlach@linux.intel.com, Moritz Fischer,
linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel, Kang, Luwei,
Zhang, Yi Z, Luebbers, Enno, Xiao Guangrong
> >> > >
> >> > >
> >> > > Does this HW Architecture require an Intel FPGA? Couldn't any vendors
> FPGA
> >> > > be used as long as it presented itself the PCIe bus the same and contained
> >> > > an appropriate Device Feature List?
> >
> > I think this is a good (and important) point. Especially when sysfs
> > entries & ioctls constituting ABI depend on it.
>
> Please cc linux-api@vger.kernel.org on your next version of this as
> linux/Documentation/process/adding-syscalls.rst specifies for new system calls.
>
Sure, will cc linux-api@vger.kernel.org on the next version patch set.
Thanks
Hao
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 11+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2017-04-12 3:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <1490875696-15145-1-git-send-email-hao.wu@intel.com>
2017-03-30 17:17 ` [PATCH 00/16] Intel FPGA Device Drivers Moritz Fischer
[not found] ` <1490875696-15145-2-git-send-email-hao.wu@intel.com>
[not found] ` <alpine.DEB.2.20.1703310907270.2072@mgerlach-VirtualBox>
[not found] ` <CANk1AXTPM+9Xdahw2sy4kSJ-Dket3Z5eS83AvW4agwSvvoFSjQ@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20170401111619.GB4804@hao-dev>
2017-04-02 14:41 ` [PATCH 01/16] docs: fpga: add a document for Intel FPGA driver overview Moritz Fischer
2017-04-03 20:44 ` Alan Tull
2017-04-04 5:24 ` Wu Hao
2017-04-04 5:06 ` Wu Hao
2017-04-11 18:02 ` Alan Tull
2017-04-12 3:22 ` Wu, Hao
[not found] ` <1490875696-15145-4-git-send-email-hao.wu@intel.com>
2017-04-04 2:10 ` [PATCH 03/16] fpga: intel: add FPGA PCIe device driver Moritz Fischer
2017-04-05 13:14 ` Wu, Hao
[not found] ` <1490875696-15145-5-git-send-email-hao.wu@intel.com>
2017-04-04 2:44 ` [PATCH 04/16] fpga: intel: pcie: parse feature list and create platform device for features Moritz Fischer
2017-04-05 12:57 ` Wu Hao
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).