linux-fpga.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: mdf@kernel.org, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	mark.rutland@arm.com, linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-api@vger.kernel.org,
	atull@kernel.org, yilun.xu@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 0/2] add performance reporting support to FPGA DFL drivers
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 21:10:42 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200115051040.GA1389@epycbox.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200114055605.GA13574@hao-dev>

Hi Greg,

On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 01:56:05PM +0800, Wu Hao wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 06, 2020 at 10:37:42AM +0800, Wu Hao wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 09:01:04AM +0800, Xu Yilum wrote:
> > > On Mon, Dec 09, 2019 at 10:45:27AM +0800, Wu Hao wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 04:08:39PM +0800, Wu Hao wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 08:01:28AM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > > > > On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 11:34:12AM +0800, Wu Hao wrote:
> > > > > > > Hi Will and Mark,
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Could you please help us on review this patchset? as this patchset mainly 
> > > > > > > introduced a new perf driver following the similar way as drivers/perf/*.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Why is it not under drivers/perf/, then?
> > > > > 
> > > > > Hi Will
> > > > > 
> > > > > Thanks for the quick response. This is one sub feature for DFL based FPGAs,
> > > > > and we plan to put this sub feature together with others, including related
> > > > > documentation. It only registers a standard perf pmu for its userspace
> > > > > interfaces.
> > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > > This patchset has been submitted for a long time but didn't receive any
> > > > > > > comment after v4. we appreciate any review comments! thanks in advance. :)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Hmm, not sure I saw the previous versions. Guessing I wasn't on cc?
> > > > > 
> > > > > We switched to perf API from v4, and started ccing you and Mark from v5. :)
> > > > 
> > > > Hi Will
> > > > 
> > > > Did you get a chance to look into this patchset?
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks
> > > > Hao
> > > 
> > > Hi Will
> > > 
> > > Did you have time to look into this patchset? We have done review work
> > > for FPGA part. And as a perf driver, we appreciate your comments.
> > > 
> > > Thanks
> > > Yilun
> > 
> > Hi Will
> > 
> > Did you get a chance to look into this patchset these days? 
> > 
> > Actually we didn't receive any comments for a long time, if you are busy and
> > don't have enough time on this, do you know if someone else could help with
> > review and ack from perf driver point of view, or any other things we can do
> > to speed up this? Thanks in advance! 
> 
> Hi Moritz
> 
> Looks like still no response from Will. :(
> 
> Do you know someone else could help?

Do you have some feedback? I'm a bit confused on what to do in such a
situation, do I just take the patch if the maintainer doesn't respond
for a while?

As always thanks for your help!

Cheers,
Moritz

  reply	other threads:[~2020-01-15  5:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-13  5:24 [PATCH v6 0/2] add performance reporting support to FPGA DFL drivers Wu Hao
2019-11-13  5:24 ` [PATCH v6 1/2] Documentation: fpga: dfl: add description for performance reporting support Wu Hao
2019-11-13  5:24 ` [PATCH v6 2/2] fpga: dfl: fme: add " Wu Hao
2019-11-27  1:45   ` Moritz Fischer
2019-11-25  3:34 ` [PATCH v6 0/2] add performance reporting support to FPGA DFL drivers Wu Hao
2019-11-25  8:01   ` Will Deacon
2019-11-25  8:08     ` Wu Hao
2019-12-09  2:45       ` Wu Hao
2019-12-16  1:01         ` Xu Yilum
2020-01-06  2:37           ` Wu Hao
2020-01-14  5:56             ` Wu Hao
2020-01-15  5:10               ` Moritz Fischer [this message]
2020-01-15  8:14                 ` Greg KH
2020-01-16  2:53                   ` Wu Hao

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200115051040.GA1389@epycbox.lan \
    --to=mdf@kernel.org \
    --cc=atull@kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yilun.xu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).