From: Wu Hao <hao.wu@intel.com>
To: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@intel.com>
Cc: mdf@kernel.org, linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Luwei Kang <luwei.kang@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] fpga: dfl: pci: add irq info for feature devices enumeration
Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 18:26:33 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200310102633.GB28396@hao-dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200310094143.GB30868@yilunxu-OptiPlex-7050>
On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 05:41:43PM +0800, Xu Yilun wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 10, 2020 at 10:46:26AM +0800, Wu Hao wrote:
> > Hi Yilun
> >
> > Some comments inline. : )
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 06:29:45PM +0800, Xu Yilun wrote:
> > > Some DFL FPGA PCIe cards (e.g. Intel FPGA Programmable Acceleration
> > > Card) support MSI-X based interrupts. This patch allows PCIe driver
> > > to prepare and pass interrupt resources to DFL via enumeration API.
> > > These interrupt resources could then be assigned to actual features
> > > which use them.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Luwei Kang <luwei.kang@intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Wu Hao <hao.wu@intel.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@intel.com>
> > > ---
> > > drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
> > > 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c b/drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c
> > > index 5387550..a3370e5 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/fpga/dfl-pci.c
> > > @@ -80,8 +80,23 @@ static void cci_remove_feature_devs(struct pci_dev *pcidev)
> > > dfl_fpga_feature_devs_remove(drvdata->cdev);
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static int *cci_pci_create_irq_table(struct pci_dev *pcidev, unsigned int nvec)
> > > +{
> > > + int *table, i;
> > > +
> > > + table = kcalloc(nvec, sizeof(int), GFP_KERNEL);
> >
> > Maybe devm_ version is better?
>
> This table will be freed right after dfl_fpga_enum_info_add_irq(). Maybe
> don't need devm_ version.
>
> >
> > > + if (!table)
> > > + return NULL;
> > > +
> > > + for (i = 0; i < nvec; i++)
> >
> > i should be unsigned int as well?
>
> Yes I should change it.
>
> >
> > > + table[i] = pci_irq_vector(pcidev, i);
Hi Yilun,
one more place here.
table = kcalloc(nevc, sizeof(int), GFP_KERNEL);
if (table) {
...
}
return table;
Thanks
Hao
> > > +
> > > + return table;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > /* enumerate feature devices under pci device */
> > > -static int cci_enumerate_feature_devs(struct pci_dev *pcidev)
> > > +static int cci_enumerate_feature_devs(struct pci_dev *pcidev,
> > > + unsigned int nvec)
> > > {
> > > struct cci_drvdata *drvdata = pci_get_drvdata(pcidev);
> > > struct dfl_fpga_enum_info *info;
> > > @@ -89,6 +104,7 @@ static int cci_enumerate_feature_devs(struct pci_dev *pcidev)
> > > resource_size_t start, len;
> > > int port_num, bar, i, ret = 0;
> > > void __iomem *base;
> > > + int *irq_table;
> > > u32 offset;
> > > u64 v;
> > >
> > > @@ -97,6 +113,18 @@ static int cci_enumerate_feature_devs(struct pci_dev *pcidev)
> > > if (!info)
> > > return -ENOMEM;
> > >
> > > + /* add irq info for enumeration if really needed */
> > > + if (nvec) {
> > > + irq_table = cci_pci_create_irq_table(pcidev, nvec);
> > > + if (irq_table) {
> > > + dfl_fpga_enum_info_add_irq(info, nvec, irq_table);
> > > + kfree(irq_table);
> > > + } else {
> > > + ret = -ENOMEM;
> > > + goto enum_info_free_exit;
> > > + }
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > /* start to find Device Feature List from Bar 0 */
> > > base = cci_pci_ioremap_bar(pcidev, 0);
> > > if (!base) {
> > > @@ -173,6 +201,28 @@ static int cci_enumerate_feature_devs(struct pci_dev *pcidev)
> > > return ret;
> > > }
> > >
> > > +static int cci_pci_alloc_irq(struct pci_dev *pcidev)
> > > +{
> > > + int nvec = pci_msix_vec_count(pcidev);
> > > + int ret;
> > > +
> > > + if (nvec <= 0) {
> > > + dev_dbg(&pcidev->dev, "fpga interrupt not supported\n");
> > > + return 0;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + ret = pci_alloc_irq_vectors(pcidev, nvec, nvec, PCI_IRQ_MSIX);
> > > + if (ret < 0)
> > > + return ret;
> > > +
> > > + return nvec;
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > +static void cci_pci_free_irq(struct pci_dev *pcidev)
> > > +{
> > > + pci_free_irq_vectors(pcidev);
> > > +}
> > > +
> > > static
> > > int cci_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pcidev, const struct pci_device_id *pcidevid)
> > > {
> > > @@ -210,14 +260,19 @@ int cci_pci_probe(struct pci_dev *pcidev, const struct pci_device_id *pcidevid)
> > > goto disable_error_report_exit;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - ret = cci_enumerate_feature_devs(pcidev);
> > > - if (ret) {
> > > - dev_err(&pcidev->dev, "enumeration failure %d.\n", ret);
> > > + ret = cci_pci_alloc_irq(pcidev);
> > > + if (ret < 0) {
> > > + dev_err(&pcidev->dev, "Fail to alloc irq %d.\n", ret);
> >
> > we prepare mmio resources in side cci_enumerate_feature_devs.
> >
> > maybe we could put irq resources code in side cce_enumerate_feature_devs too?
>
> Yes I will try to change it in patch v2.
>
> Thanks for your quick response.
>
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> > Hao
> >
> > > goto disable_error_report_exit;
> > > }
> > >
> > > - return ret;
> > > + ret = cci_enumerate_feature_devs(pcidev, (unsigned int)ret);
> > > + if (!ret)
> > > + return ret;
> > > +
> > > + dev_err(&pcidev->dev, "enumeration failure %d.\n", ret);
> > >
> > > + cci_pci_free_irq(pcidev);
> > > disable_error_report_exit:
> > > pci_disable_pcie_error_reporting(pcidev);
> > > return ret;
> > > @@ -263,6 +318,7 @@ static void cci_pci_remove(struct pci_dev *pcidev)
> > > cci_pci_sriov_configure(pcidev, 0);
> > >
> > > cci_remove_feature_devs(pcidev);
> > > + cci_pci_free_irq(pcidev);
> > > pci_disable_pcie_error_reporting(pcidev);
> > > }
> > >
> > > --
> > > 2.7.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-10 10:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-09 10:29 [PATCH 0/7] Add interrupt support to FPGA DFL drivers Xu Yilun
2020-03-09 10:29 ` [PATCH 1/7] fpga: dfl: parse interrupt info for feature devices on enumeration Xu Yilun
2020-03-10 2:26 ` Wu Hao
2020-03-10 9:25 ` Xu Yilun
2020-03-10 10:21 ` Wu Hao
2020-03-09 10:29 ` [PATCH 2/7] fpga: dfl: pci: add irq info for feature devices enumeration Xu Yilun
2020-03-10 2:46 ` Wu Hao
2020-03-10 9:41 ` Xu Yilun
2020-03-10 10:26 ` Wu Hao [this message]
2020-03-09 10:29 ` [PATCH 3/7] fpga: dfl: introduce interrupt trigger setting API Xu Yilun
2020-03-10 10:30 ` Wu Hao
2020-03-11 2:14 ` Xu Yilun
2020-03-09 10:29 ` [PATCH 4/7] fpga: dfl: afu: add interrupt support for error reporting Xu Yilun
2020-03-10 10:39 ` Wu Hao
2020-03-10 16:47 ` Xu Yilun
2020-03-11 2:43 ` Wu Hao
2020-03-11 6:35 ` Xu Yilun
2020-03-09 10:29 ` [PATCH 5/7] fpga: dfl: fme: add interrupt support for global " Xu Yilun
2020-03-09 10:29 ` [PATCH 6/7] fpga: dfl: afu: add user interrupt support Xu Yilun
2020-03-09 10:29 ` [PATCH 7/7] Documentation: fpga: dfl: add descriptions for interrupt related interfaces Xu Yilun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200310102633.GB28396@hao-dev \
--to=hao.wu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luwei.kang@intel.com \
--cc=mdf@kernel.org \
--cc=yilun.xu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).