* [PATCH] fpga: xilinx-spi: Add missing spi_device_id table
@ 2025-10-26 11:02 Fabio Estevam
2025-11-03 14:57 ` Xu Yilun
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Fabio Estevam @ 2025-10-26 11:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: mdf; +Cc: yilun.xu, trix, linux-fpga, Fabio Estevam
The "xlnx,fpga-slave-serial" devicetree compatible string currently misses
its SPI device ID entry. Without an spi_device_id table, the driver still
works with device tree, but triggers the following runtime warning when
registered via SPI core:
SPI driver xlnx-slave-spi has no spi_device_id for xlnx,fpga-slave-serial
Fix it by adding a corresponding spi_device_id table entry.
Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
---
drivers/fpga/xilinx-spi.c | 7 +++++++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/fpga/xilinx-spi.c b/drivers/fpga/xilinx-spi.c
index 8756504340de..26348a768bbc 100644
--- a/drivers/fpga/xilinx-spi.c
+++ b/drivers/fpga/xilinx-spi.c
@@ -57,6 +57,12 @@ static int xilinx_spi_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
return xilinx_core_probe(core);
}
+static const struct spi_device_id xilinx_spi_ids[] = {
+ { "fpga-slave-serial" },
+ { },
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(spi, xilinx_spi_ids);
+
#ifdef CONFIG_OF
static const struct of_device_id xlnx_spi_of_match[] = {
{
@@ -73,6 +79,7 @@ static struct spi_driver xilinx_slave_spi_driver = {
.of_match_table = of_match_ptr(xlnx_spi_of_match),
},
.probe = xilinx_spi_probe,
+ .id_table = xilinx_spi_ids,
};
module_spi_driver(xilinx_slave_spi_driver)
--
2.34.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] fpga: xilinx-spi: Add missing spi_device_id table
2025-10-26 11:02 [PATCH] fpga: xilinx-spi: Add missing spi_device_id table Fabio Estevam
@ 2025-11-03 14:57 ` Xu Yilun
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Xu Yilun @ 2025-11-03 14:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fabio Estevam; +Cc: mdf, yilun.xu, trix, linux-fpga
On Sun, Oct 26, 2025 at 08:02:37AM -0300, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> The "xlnx,fpga-slave-serial" devicetree compatible string currently misses
> its SPI device ID entry. Without an spi_device_id table, the driver still
> works with device tree, but triggers the following runtime warning when
> registered via SPI core:
>
> SPI driver xlnx-slave-spi has no spi_device_id for xlnx,fpga-slave-serial
>
> Fix it by adding a corresponding spi_device_id table entry.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/fpga/xilinx-spi.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/xilinx-spi.c b/drivers/fpga/xilinx-spi.c
> index 8756504340de..26348a768bbc 100644
> --- a/drivers/fpga/xilinx-spi.c
> +++ b/drivers/fpga/xilinx-spi.c
> @@ -57,6 +57,12 @@ static int xilinx_spi_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> return xilinx_core_probe(core);
> }
>
> +static const struct spi_device_id xilinx_spi_ids[] = {
> + { "fpga-slave-serial" },
> + { },
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(spi, xilinx_spi_ids);
> +
> #ifdef CONFIG_OF
> static const struct of_device_id xlnx_spi_of_match[] = {
> {
> @@ -73,6 +79,7 @@ static struct spi_driver xilinx_slave_spi_driver = {
> .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(xlnx_spi_of_match),
> },
> .probe = xilinx_spi_probe,
> + .id_table = xilinx_spi_ids,
One whitespace is enough, I fixed it in place.
Others look good to me.
Reviewed-by: Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@linux.intel.com>
Applied to for-next, thanks
> };
>
> module_spi_driver(xilinx_slave_spi_driver)
> --
> 2.34.1
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-11-03 15:11 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-10-26 11:02 [PATCH] fpga: xilinx-spi: Add missing spi_device_id table Fabio Estevam
2025-11-03 14:57 ` Xu Yilun
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).