From: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@cern.ch>
To: Alan Tull <atull@kernel.org>, Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>,
linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: fpga: fpga_mgr_get() buggy ?
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 15:13:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4617134.5euanDEBgJ@pcbe13614> (raw)
Hello,
I believe that this patch
fpga: manager: change api, don't use drvdata
7085e2a94f7df5f419e3cfb2fe809ce6564e9629
is incomplete and buggy.
I completely agree that drvdata should not be used by the FPGA manager
or any other subsystem like that.
What is buggy is the function fpga_mgr_get().
That patch has been done to allow multiple FPGA manager instances to
be linked to the same device (PCI it says). But function
fpga_mgr_get() will return only the first found: what about the
others?
Then, all load kernel-doc comments says:
"This code assumes the caller got the mgr pointer from
of_fpga_mgr_get() or fpga_mgr_get()"
but that function does not allow me to get, for instance, the second
FPGA manager on my card.
Since, thanks to this patch I'm actually the creator of the
fpga_manager structure, I do not need to use fpga_mgr_get() to
retrieve that data structure.
Despite this, I believe we still need to increment the module
reference counter (which is done by fpga_mgr_get()).
We can fix this function by just replacing the argument from 'device'
to 'fpga_manager' (the one returned by create() ). Alternatively, we
can add an 'owner' field in "struct fpga_manager_ops" and 'get' it
when we use it. Or again, just an 'owner' argument in the create()
function. I'm proposing these alternatives because I'm not sure that
this is correct:
if (!try_module_get(dev->parent->driver->owner))
What if the device does not have a driver? Do we consider the
following a valid use case?
probe(struct device *dev) {
struct device *mydev;
mydev->parent = dev;
device_register(mydev);
fpga_mrg_create(mydev, ....);
}
thanks :)
next reply other threads:[~2018-06-21 13:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-06-21 13:13 Federico Vaga [this message]
2018-06-22 2:07 ` fpga: fpga_mgr_get() buggy ? Alan Tull
2018-06-22 7:53 ` Federico Vaga
2018-06-26 21:00 ` Alan Tull
2018-06-27 9:25 ` Federico Vaga
2018-06-27 21:23 ` Alan Tull
2018-06-28 7:50 ` Federico Vaga
2018-07-18 19:47 ` Alan Tull
2018-07-18 21:47 ` Federico Vaga
2018-08-15 21:02 ` Alan Tull
2018-08-16 7:18 ` Federico Vaga
2018-08-16 18:20 ` Alan Tull
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4617134.5euanDEBgJ@pcbe13614 \
--to=federico.vaga@cern.ch \
--cc=atull@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mdf@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).