linux-fpga.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Federico Vaga <federico.vaga@cern.ch>
To: Alan Tull <atull@kernel.org>, Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>,
	linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: fpga: fpga_mgr_get() buggy ?
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2018 15:13:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4617134.5euanDEBgJ@pcbe13614> (raw)

Hello,

I believe that this patch

fpga: manager: change api, don't use drvdata
7085e2a94f7df5f419e3cfb2fe809ce6564e9629

is incomplete and buggy.

I completely agree that drvdata should not be used by the FPGA manager 
or any other subsystem like that.

What is buggy is the function fpga_mgr_get().
That patch has been done to allow multiple FPGA manager instances to 
be linked to the same device (PCI it says). But function 
fpga_mgr_get() will return only the first found: what about the 
others?

Then, all load kernel-doc comments says:

"This code assumes the caller got the mgr pointer from 
of_fpga_mgr_get() or fpga_mgr_get()"

but that function does not allow me to get, for instance, the second 
FPGA manager on my card.

Since, thanks to this patch I'm actually the creator of the 
fpga_manager structure,  I do not need to use fpga_mgr_get() to 
retrieve that data structure.
Despite this, I believe we still need to increment the module 
reference counter (which is done by fpga_mgr_get()).

We can fix this function by just replacing the argument from 'device' 
to 'fpga_manager' (the one returned by create() ). Alternatively, we 
can add an 'owner' field in "struct fpga_manager_ops" and 'get' it 
when we use it. Or again, just an 'owner' argument in the create() 
function. I'm proposing these alternatives because I'm not sure that 
this is correct:

	if (!try_module_get(dev->parent->driver->owner))

What if the device does not have a driver? Do we consider the 
following a valid use case?


probe(struct device *dev) {
  struct device *mydev;

  mydev->parent = dev;
  device_register(mydev);
  fpga_mrg_create(mydev, ....);
}


thanks :)




             reply	other threads:[~2018-06-21 13:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-06-21 13:13 Federico Vaga [this message]
2018-06-22  2:07 ` fpga: fpga_mgr_get() buggy ? Alan Tull
2018-06-22  7:53   ` Federico Vaga
2018-06-26 21:00     ` Alan Tull
2018-06-27  9:25       ` Federico Vaga
2018-06-27 21:23         ` Alan Tull
2018-06-28  7:50           ` Federico Vaga
2018-07-18 19:47             ` Alan Tull
2018-07-18 21:47               ` Federico Vaga
2018-08-15 21:02                 ` Alan Tull
2018-08-16  7:18                   ` Federico Vaga
2018-08-16 18:20                     ` Alan Tull

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4617134.5euanDEBgJ@pcbe13614 \
    --to=federico.vaga@cern.ch \
    --cc=atull@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mdf@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).