From: "Arnd Bergmann" <arnd@arndb.de>
To: "Nava kishore Manne" <nava.kishore.manne@amd.com>,
git@amd.com, mdf@kernel.org, hao.wu@intel.com,
yilun.xu@intel.com, "Tom Rix" <trix@redhat.com>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Saravana Kannan" <saravanak@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org,
devicetree@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 1/1] fpga-region: Add generic IOCTL interface for runtime FPGA programming
Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 22:12:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7f818704-d40c-42da-b2c5-942d31e1d9dc@app.fastmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241029091734.3288005-2-nava.kishore.manne@amd.com>
> + * FPGA Region Control IOCTLs.
> + */
> +#define FPGA_REGION_MAGIC 'f'
> +#define FPGA_IOW(num, dtype) _IOW(FPGA_REGION_MAGIC, num, dtype)
> +#define FPGA_IOR(num, dtype) _IOR(FPGA_REGION_MAGIC, num, dtype)
> +
> +#define FPGA_REGION_IOCTL_LOAD FPGA_IOW(0, __u32)
> +#define FPGA_REGION_IOCTL_REMOVE FPGA_IOW(1, __u32)
> +#define FPGA_REGION_IOCTL_STATUS FPGA_IOR(2, __u32)
The definition does not appear to match the usage in the driver,
since you don't pass a __u32 structure but instead a
fpga_region_config_info.
Please also remove the extra FPGA_IOW/FPGA_IOR macros and just use
_IOW/IOR directly so it is possible to process the headers when
identifying ioctl command codes.
The 'f' range seems to be rather overloaded already with filesystem
ioctls:
'f' 00-1F linux/ext2_fs.h conflict!
'f' 00-1F linux/ext3_fs.h conflict!
'f' 00-0F fs/jfs/jfs_dinode.h conflict!
'f' 00-0F fs/ext4/ext4.h conflict!
'f' 00-0F linux/fs.h conflict!
'f' 00-0F fs/ocfs2/ocfs2_fs.h conflict!
In particular, the numbers you have defined are very similar to these:
some of these:
#define FS_IOC_GETFLAGS _IOR('f', 1, long)
#define FS_IOC_SETFLAGS _IOW('f', 2, long)
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-03-17 21:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-29 9:17 [RFC v2 0/1]Add user space interaction for FPGA programming Nava kishore Manne
2024-10-29 9:17 ` [RFC v2 1/1] fpga-region: Add generic IOCTL interface for runtime " Nava kishore Manne
2024-11-19 4:14 ` Xu Yilun
2024-11-21 10:07 ` Manne, Nava kishore
2024-11-27 1:49 ` Xu Yilun
2024-12-04 6:40 ` Manne, Nava kishore
2024-12-10 9:03 ` Xu Yilun
2024-12-19 9:47 ` Manne, Nava kishore
2023-03-19 15:38 ` Xu Yilun
2025-02-11 11:50 ` Manne, Nava kishore
2024-11-25 11:26 ` Marco Pagani
2024-11-28 1:34 ` Xu Yilun
2025-01-26 21:13 ` Marco Pagani
2025-02-06 6:04 ` Xu Yilun
2025-02-17 15:18 ` Marco Pagani
2025-03-01 9:27 ` Xu Yilun
2025-03-16 21:55 ` Marco Pagani
2025-03-17 6:08 ` Xu Yilun
2025-03-17 21:12 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2024-11-18 6:11 ` [RFC v2 0/1]Add user space interaction for " Manne, Nava kishore
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7f818704-d40c-42da-b2c5-942d31e1d9dc@app.fastmail.com \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=git@amd.com \
--cc=hao.wu@intel.com \
--cc=linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mdf@kernel.org \
--cc=nava.kishore.manne@amd.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=saravanak@google.com \
--cc=trix@redhat.com \
--cc=yilun.xu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).