From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Return-Path: Received: from postout1.mail.lrz.de ([129.187.255.137]:44123 "EHLO postout1.mail.lrz.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751000AbdLGUO5 (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Dec 2017 15:14:57 -0500 Subject: Re: Linux hang References: <4d6911ffa53349b0881ff4d4845bc101@hm.edu> <71bcb4759caa437dba81be27fc611239@hm.edu> From: Jan Siegmund Message-ID: <889a3fd6-5935-899c-a1da-ee974aa6e30e@hm.edu> Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 21:14:54 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-fpga-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org To: Alan Tull Cc: "u-boot@lists.denx.de" , "linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org" , matthew.gerlach@linux.intel.com Am 07.12.2017 um 20:19 schrieb Alan Tull: > On Thu, Dec 7, 2017 at 5:00 AM, Siegmund, Jan wrote: > > Hi SIegmund, > >> Hi all, >> does anybody have an idea for the following problem? >> >> * FPGA is programmed using an overlay >> * FPGA writes to SDRAM via the FPGA2SDRAM-bridge >> * Linux hangs and the watchdog resets the board (the FPGA stays programmed) >> * After the reset and boot, the FPGA is reprogrammed using the same overlay >> * Now, the FPGA can write to the SDRAM without a problem >> >> The environment: >> >> *Board: DE0-NANO-SoC >> *U-Boot: 2017.11 >> *Kernel: 4.14.0-rc7 (review-v4.14-rc7-non-dt-support-v5.1 branch) >> >> The overlay: >> >> /dts-v1/; >> /plugin/; >> >> / { >> fragment@0 { >> target-path = "/soc/base_fpga_region"; >> #address-cells = <1>; >> #size-cells = <1>; >> __overlay__ { >> #address-cells = <1>; >> #size-cells = <1>; >> fpga-bridges = <&fpga_bridge0 &fpga_bridge1>; >> firmware-name = "foo_base.rbf"; >> >> fpga-bridge@ffc25080 { >> compatible = "altr,socfpga-fpga2sdram-bridge"; >> reg = <0xffc25080 0x4>; >> bridge-enable = <1>; >> }; > > It's been a while since I've touched that bridge, but here's what I > can think of, hope it helps. > > This overlay will add the bridge after programming. It looks like it > should enable it since you have bridge-enable = <1>, so I'm not sure > why that's not working. > > Would it make sense to add the f2s bridge before doing the fpga > programming? You could add the f2s bridge in the base device tree and > add it to your fpga-bridges list so that that bridge is enabled after > the fpga is programmed. Hi Alan, this might be worth a try. Thanks, Jan > > Alan > >> >> foo@ff200000 { >> compatible= "altr,bar"; >> interrupt-parent = <&intc>; >> interrupts = <0 40 4>; >> }; >> >> }; >> }; >> }; >> >> Thanks >