From: "Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
To: Ivan Bornyakov <i.bornyakov@metrotek.ru>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com>,
Moritz Fischer <mdf@kernel.org>, Wu Hao <hao.wu@intel.com>,
Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@intel.com>, Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>,
linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
system@metrotek.ru
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] fpga: microchip-spi: rewrite status polling in a time measurable way
Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2022 12:22:17 +0200 (EET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9581d578-b4c2-cfca-f750-53196bb3324@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20221227100450.2257-3-i.bornyakov@metrotek.ru>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2489 bytes --]
On Tue, 27 Dec 2022, Ivan Bornyakov wrote:
> Original busy loop with retries count in mpf_poll_status() is not too
> reliable, as it takes different times on different systems. Replace it
> with read_poll_timeout() macro.
>
> While at it, fix polling stop condition to met function's original
> intention declared in the comment. The issue with original polling stop
> condition is that it stops if any of mask bits is set, while intention
> was to stop if all mask bits is set. This was not noticible because only
> MPF_STATUS_READY is passed as mask argument and it is BIT(1).
>
> Fixes: 5f8d4a900830 ("fpga: microchip-spi: add Microchip MPF FPGA manager")
> Signed-off-by: Ivan Bornyakov <i.bornyakov@metrotek.ru>
> ---
> drivers/fpga/microchip-spi.c | 24 ++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/fpga/microchip-spi.c b/drivers/fpga/microchip-spi.c
> index e72fedd93a27..8d1d9476d0cc 100644
> --- a/drivers/fpga/microchip-spi.c
> +++ b/drivers/fpga/microchip-spi.c
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> #include <asm/unaligned.h>
> #include <linux/delay.h>
> #include <linux/fpga/fpga-mgr.h>
> +#include <linux/iopoll.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/of_device.h>
> #include <linux/spi/spi.h>
> @@ -33,7 +34,7 @@
>
> #define MPF_BITS_PER_COMPONENT_SIZE 22
>
> -#define MPF_STATUS_POLL_RETRIES 10000
> +#define MPF_STATUS_POLL_TIMEOUT (2 * USEC_PER_SEC)
> #define MPF_STATUS_BUSY BIT(0)
> #define MPF_STATUS_READY BIT(1)
> #define MPF_STATUS_SPI_VIOLATION BIT(2)
> @@ -197,21 +198,16 @@ static int mpf_ops_parse_header(struct fpga_manager *mgr,
> /* Poll HW status until busy bit is cleared and mask bits are set. */
> static int mpf_poll_status(struct mpf_priv *priv, u8 mask)
> {
> - int status, retries = MPF_STATUS_POLL_RETRIES;
> + int ret, status;
>
> - while (retries--) {
> - status = mpf_read_status(priv);
> - if (status < 0)
> - return status;
> -
> - if (status & MPF_STATUS_BUSY)
> - continue;
> -
> - if (!mask || (status & mask))
> - return status;
> - }
> + ret = read_poll_timeout(mpf_read_status, status,
> + (status < 0) ||
> + ((status & (MPF_STATUS_BUSY | mask)) == mask),
> + 0, MPF_STATUS_POLL_TIMEOUT, false, priv);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
>
> - return -EBUSY;
> + return status;
> }
>
> static int mpf_spi_write(struct mpf_priv *priv, const void *buf, size_t buf_size)
Reviewed-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
--
i.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-12-27 10:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-12-27 10:04 [PATCH v3 0/3] Reliability improvements for Microchip MPF FPGA manager Ivan Bornyakov
2022-12-27 10:04 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] fpga: microchip-spi: move SPI I/O buffers out of stack Ivan Bornyakov
2022-12-28 14:42 ` Conor Dooley
2022-12-27 10:04 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] fpga: microchip-spi: rewrite status polling in a time measurable way Ivan Bornyakov
2022-12-27 10:22 ` Ilpo Järvinen [this message]
2022-12-28 14:50 ` Conor Dooley
2022-12-27 10:04 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] fpga: microchip-spi: separate data frame write routine Ivan Bornyakov
2022-12-28 14:54 ` Conor Dooley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9581d578-b4c2-cfca-f750-53196bb3324@linux.intel.com \
--to=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=conor.dooley@microchip.com \
--cc=hao.wu@intel.com \
--cc=i.bornyakov@metrotek.ru \
--cc=linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mdf@kernel.org \
--cc=system@metrotek.ru \
--cc=trix@redhat.com \
--cc=yilun.xu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).