linux-fpga.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Colberg, Peter" <peter.colberg@intel.com>
To: "yilun.xu@linux.intel.com" <yilun.xu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: "Xu, Yilun" <yilun.xu@intel.com>,
	"linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org>,
	"mdf@kernel.org" <mdf@kernel.org>, "Wu, Hao" <hao.wu@intel.com>,
	"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"russ.weight@linux.dev" <russ.weight@linux.dev>,
	"Pagani, Marco" <marpagan@redhat.com>,
	"trix@redhat.com" <trix@redhat.com>,
	"basheer.ahmed.muddebihal@linux.intel.com"
	<basheer.ahmed.muddebihal@linux.intel.com>,
	"matthew.gerlach@linux.intel.com"
	<matthew.gerlach@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 15/19] fpga: dfl: convert is_feature_dev_detected() to use FIU type
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2024 23:00:28 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bad311610de9738e88982fabc46c04b15cdc3650.camel@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZztQAsDCyRqGm6UW@yilunxu-OptiPlex-7050>

On Mon, 2024-11-18 at 22:32 +0800, Xu Yilun wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 06:37:10PM -0400, Peter Colberg wrote:
> > Use binfo->type instead of binfo->feature_dev to decide whether a
> > feature device was detected during feature parsing. A subsequent
> > commit will delay the allocation of the feature platform device
> > to feature_dev_register() and remove binfo->feature_dev.
> > 
> > This commit does not introduce any functional changes.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Peter Colberg <peter.colberg@intel.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Matthew Gerlach <matthew.gerlach@linux.intel.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Basheer Ahmed Muddebihal <basheer.ahmed.muddebihal@linux.intel.com>
> > ---
> > Changes since v3:
> > - New patch extracted from last patch of v3 series.
> > ---
> >  drivers/fpga/dfl.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/fpga/dfl.c b/drivers/fpga/dfl.c
> > index 758673b0290a..a9ec37278b2d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/fpga/dfl.c
> > +++ b/drivers/fpga/dfl.c
> > @@ -1248,7 +1248,7 @@ static int parse_feature_port_afu(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo,
> >  return create_feature_instance(binfo, ofst, size, FEATURE_ID_AFU);
> >  }
> >  
> > -#define is_feature_dev_detected(binfo) (!!(binfo)->feature_dev)
> > +#define is_feature_dev_detected(binfo) ((binfo)->type != DFL_ID_MAX)
> 
> I still doesn't get why put the change here. How it resolves my concern
> compared to v3?

Could you elaborate on your concern? I moved this change into a
separate commit so that it is not lost in other changes, but I don't
see how the two definitions would not be functionally equivalent. Would
it help to extend the commit description along the following lines?

   1. Before this series, binfo->feature_dev was initialized to NULL by
      devm_kzalloc() in dfl_fpga_feature_devs_enumerate(). After this
      series, binfo->type is initialized to DFL_ID_MAX in
      dfl_fpga_feature_devs_enumerate().
   2. Before this series, binfo->feature_dev was set to a non-NULL
      pointer in build_info_create_dev(), which in turn was called from
      parse_feature_fiu(). After this series, binfo->type is set to a
      non-DFL_ID_MAX value, as returned by dfh_id_to_type(), in
      parse_feature_fiu().
   3. Before this series, binfo->feature_dev was reset to NULL at the
      end of build_info_commit_dev(). After this series, binfo->type is
      reset to DFL_ID_MAX at the end of build_info_commit_dev().

Thanks,
Peter

> 
> Thanks,
> Yilun
> 
> >  
> >  static int parse_feature_afu(struct build_feature_devs_info *binfo,
> >  resource_size_t ofst)
> > -- 
> > 2.47.0
> > 
> > 


  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-18 23:01 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-25 22:36 [PATCH v4 00/19] fpga: dfl: fix kernel warning on port release/assign for SRIOV Peter Colberg
2024-10-25 22:36 ` [PATCH v4 01/19] fpga: dfl: omit unneeded argument pdata from dfl_feature_instance_init() Peter Colberg
2024-10-25 22:36 ` [PATCH v4 02/19] fpga: dfl: return platform data from dfl_fpga_inode_to_feature_dev_data() Peter Colberg
2024-10-25 22:36 ` [PATCH v4 03/19] fpga: dfl: afu: use parent device to log errors on port enable/disable Peter Colberg
2024-10-25 22:36 ` [PATCH v4 04/19] fpga: dfl: afu: define local pointer to feature device Peter Colberg
2024-10-25 22:37 ` [PATCH v4 05/19] fpga: dfl: pass feature platform data instead of device as argument Peter Colberg
2024-10-25 22:37 ` [PATCH v4 06/19] fpga: dfl: factor out feature data creation from build_info_commit_dev() Peter Colberg
2024-10-25 22:37 ` [PATCH v4 07/19] fpga: dfl: store FIU type in feature platform data Peter Colberg
2024-10-25 22:37 ` [PATCH v4 08/19] fpga: dfl: refactor internal DFL APIs to take/return feature device data Peter Colberg
2024-10-25 22:37 ` [PATCH v4 09/19] fpga: dfl: factor out feature device registration Peter Colberg
2024-10-25 22:37 ` [PATCH v4 10/19] fpga: dfl: factor out feature device data from platform device data Peter Colberg
2024-10-25 22:37 ` [PATCH v4 11/19] fpga: dfl: convert features from flexible array member to separate array Peter Colberg
2024-10-25 22:37 ` [PATCH v4 12/19] fpga: dfl: store MMIO resources in feature device data Peter Colberg
2024-10-25 22:37 ` [PATCH v4 13/19] fpga: dfl: store platform device name " Peter Colberg
2024-10-25 22:37 ` [PATCH v4 14/19] fpga: dfl: store platform device id " Peter Colberg
2024-11-18 14:34   ` Xu Yilun
2024-11-19 23:34     ` Colberg, Peter
2024-10-25 22:37 ` [PATCH v4 15/19] fpga: dfl: convert is_feature_dev_detected() to use FIU type Peter Colberg
2024-11-18 14:32   ` Xu Yilun
2024-11-18 23:00     ` Colberg, Peter [this message]
2024-11-19  1:19       ` Xu Yilun
2024-11-19 23:37         ` Colberg, Peter
2024-10-25 22:37 ` [PATCH v4 16/19] fpga: dfl: allocate platform device after feature device data Peter Colberg
2024-11-18 14:51   ` Xu Yilun
2024-11-18 23:04     ` Colberg, Peter
2024-11-19 23:39       ` Colberg, Peter
2024-10-25 22:37 ` [PATCH v4 17/19] fpga: dfl: remove unneeded function build_info_create_dev() Peter Colberg
2024-11-18 14:58   ` Xu Yilun
2024-11-19 23:40     ` Colberg, Peter
2024-10-25 22:37 ` [PATCH v4 18/19] fpga: dfl: drop unneeded get_device() and put_device() of feature device Peter Colberg
2024-11-18 15:01   ` Xu Yilun
2024-10-25 22:37 ` [PATCH v4 19/19] fpga: dfl: destroy/recreate feature platform device on port release/assign Peter Colberg
2024-11-18 15:09   ` Xu Yilun
2024-11-19 23:46     ` Colberg, Peter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bad311610de9738e88982fabc46c04b15cdc3650.camel@intel.com \
    --to=peter.colberg@intel.com \
    --cc=basheer.ahmed.muddebihal@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=hao.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marpagan@redhat.com \
    --cc=matthew.gerlach@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mdf@kernel.org \
    --cc=russ.weight@linux.dev \
    --cc=trix@redhat.com \
    --cc=yilun.xu@intel.com \
    --cc=yilun.xu@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).