From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm1-f67.google.com ([209.85.128.67]:40102 "EHLO mail-wm1-f67.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726622AbfHPH3o (ORCPT ); Fri, 16 Aug 2019 03:29:44 -0400 Subject: Re: [PATCH v12 0/4] crypto: switch to crypto API for ESSIV generation References: <20190815192858.28125-1-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> From: Milan Broz Message-ID: <1463bca3-77dc-42be-7624-e8eaf5cfbf32@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 09:29:39 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190815192858.28125-1-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-fscrypt-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Ard Biesheuvel , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org Cc: Herbert Xu , Eric Biggers , dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, Gilad Ben-Yossef List-ID: Hi Ard, On 15/08/2019 21:28, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > Changes since v10: > - Drop patches against fscrypt and dm-crypt - these will be routed via the > respective maintainer trees during the next cycle I tested the previous dm-crypt patches (I also try to keep them in my kernel.org tree), it works and looks fine to me (and I like the final cleanup :) Once all maintainers are happy with the current state, I think it should go to the next release (5.4; IMO both ESSIV API and dm-crypt changes). Maybe you could keep sending dm-crypt patches in the end of the series (to help testing it)? (Just for for now I am completely distracted by other urgent unrelated issues.) Milan