Linux FSCRYPT development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
To: Eric Biggers <ebiggers3@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fscrypt: lock mutex before checking for bounce page pool
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2017 06:25:32 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20171029102532.cgdcymx7pqjirmbl@thunk.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170706175748.33093-1-ebiggers3@gmail.com>

On Thu, Jul 06, 2017 at 10:57:48AM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
> 
> fscrypt_initialize(), which allocates the global bounce page pool when
> an encrypted file is first accessed, uses "double-checked locking" to
> try to avoid locking fscrypt_init_mutex.  However, it doesn't use any
> memory barriers, so it's theoretically possible for a thread to observe
> a bounce page pool which has not been fully initialized.  This is a
> classic bug with "double-checked locking".
> 
> While "only a theoretical issue" in the latest kernel, in pre-4.8
> kernels the pointer that was checked was not even the last to be
> initialized, so it was easily possible for a crash (NULL pointer
> dereference) to happen.  This was changed only incidentally by the large
> refactor to use fs/crypto/.
> 
> Solve both problems in a trivial way that can easily be backported: just
> always take the mutex.  It's theoretically less efficient, but it
> shouldn't be noticeable in practice as the mutex is only acquired very
> briefly once per encrypted file.
> 
> Later I'd like to make this use a helper macro like DO_ONCE().  However,
> DO_ONCE() runs in atomic context, so we'd need to add a new macro that
> allows blocking.
> 
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.1+
> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>

Applied, thanks.  Sorry for the delay; this slipped through the
cracks, and then I had a crazy travel/conference schedule.

		    	    	       	 - Ted

      parent reply	other threads:[~2017-10-29 10:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-06 17:57 [PATCH] fscrypt: lock mutex before checking for bounce page pool Eric Biggers
2017-09-13  5:22 ` Eric Biggers
2017-10-09 20:53   ` Eric Biggers
2017-10-29 10:25 ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20171029102532.cgdcymx7pqjirmbl@thunk.org \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=ebiggers3@gmail.com \
    --cc=ebiggers@google.com \
    --cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox