From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 07:24:23 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 02/14] Consolidate "post read processing" into a new file Message-ID: <20190424142423.GA12761@infradead.org> References: <20190424043730.13683-1-chandan@linux.ibm.com> <20190424043730.13683-3-chandan@linux.ibm.com> <20190424053544.GA12092@infradead.org> <6353008.fQNhCuxumZ@localhost.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <6353008.fQNhCuxumZ@localhost.localdomain> To: Chandan Rajendra Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, ebiggers@kernel.org, jaegeuk@kernel.org, yuchao0@huawei.com List-ID: On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 03:34:17PM +0530, Chandan Rajendra wrote: > To clarify, Are you suggesting that a new kconfig option (say > CONFIG_FS_READ_CALLBACKS) be provided to the user so that the following could > occur, > > 1. User selects CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION and/or CONFIG_FS_VERITY and this causes > CONFIG_FS_READ_CALLBACKS to be set to 'y'. > 2. User selects CONFIG_FS_READ_CALLBACKS explicitly. If you don't add a user description to a Kconfig entry it won't be visible to users, but only selectable by other options. That is what I suggest.