From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 55CDAC5DF63 for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 18:43:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 270D6217F5 for ; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 18:43:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1573065815; bh=ke8JGRHDbOZzUcdQbFDcBJrQ4vmk1ezt+ayq+wpvnS8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=bL00OoPYvwBmTPwOtBwJRqTXuUCieqQJhiKMuus/JF6/T72syfFMuWBJVEoZL0lU9 g3PDEOoZOzQuzVLASMYS50duHwAUYG3t0qrCJqen9RJxguRQhoMjKh30utcvzgNXLv g3qFLwW5fOsqKzittgswrx3wPj+W21MGDL78kV0U= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727208AbfKFSne (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Nov 2019 13:43:34 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:41744 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726713AbfKFSne (ORCPT ); Wed, 6 Nov 2019 13:43:34 -0500 Received: from sol.localdomain (c-24-5-143-220.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [24.5.143.220]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0EEA2217F4; Wed, 6 Nov 2019 18:43:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1573065814; bh=ke8JGRHDbOZzUcdQbFDcBJrQ4vmk1ezt+ayq+wpvnS8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=WsguCgvnEkD+OWNLq0HbslNmJPDLUmQEoba+6mPGu+BWqCNW/xfQZRJMZ2+1Tps2X f9cE7lMm+79NXSZqukicWL/LFvqM5OpQJ5t233C9zUKVAIumgux1oqMBNfnCtVWOtk jjDkHgfontJg/Svd8ZSDwbCRYjj4F0aH4wK71Qt0= Date: Wed, 6 Nov 2019 10:43:32 -0800 From: Eric Biggers To: Colin Walters Cc: linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: version/tags for fsverity-utils Message-ID: <20191106184332.GC2766@sol.localdomain> Mail-Followup-To: Colin Walters , linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org References: <3c1e9aca-2390-4350-a19d-baff6a065c6a@www.fastmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3c1e9aca-2390-4350-a19d-baff6a065c6a@www.fastmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.12.2 (2019-09-21) Sender: linux-fscrypt-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 10:57:08AM -0500, Colin Walters wrote: > Hi, I'm looking at fsverity for Fedora CoreOS (a bit more background in https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/pull/1959 ) > I have a bunch of questions there (feel free to jump in), but just to start here: > > I'd like to get fsverity-utils as a Fedora package, but there don't seem to be any git tags on the repo https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiggers/fsverity-utils.git/ - I could make up a datestamped version number, but I think it'd be better if there were upstream tags - it is useful to have releases with human-consumable version numbers for the usual reasons. And RPM/dpkg/etc really care about the version numbers of packages. > > Other distributions/some packagers think "release" means tarballs, so someone may want to consider that too, personally > I use https://github.com/cgwalters/git-evtag for making git tags since I think it helps replace tarballs. Yes, I think it's time for a formal release of fsverity-utils now that fs-verity is in the upstream kernel. I've tagged v1.0 and uploaded the tarball to here: https://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/ebiggers/fsverity-utils/v1.0/ - Eric