Re: [PATCH v6 35/80] docs: fs: fscrypt.rst: get rid of :c:type: tags

[Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>]

On Thu, Oct 15, 2020 at 07:32:07AM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> On the other hand, if one finds a valid "struct foo" using normal
> fonts, this would mean that either the doc is outdated, mentioning
> an struct that were removed/renamed or that there's a missing 
> kernel-doc markup.
> 
> In any case, the fix is to simply fix the kernel-doc markup for
> struct foo.
> 
> I guess in the future automarkup.py could issue a warning in
> order to warn about missing cross-references, perhaps when
> W=1 or W=2 is used.

Well, most structs that fscrypt.rst refers to are defined in
include/uapi/linux/fscrypt.h.  The whole fscrypt UAPI, including the fields of
these structs, is documented in fscrypt.rst.  So I didn't really intend the
fscrypt UAPI structs to have kerneldoc comments, as people are supposed to refer
to the documentation in fscrypt.rst instead.  We could have both, but it feels a
bit redundant.

- Eric