From: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
To: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
Cc: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>, Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org,
kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/14] fscrypt: setup leaf inodes for extent encryption
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2023 14:16:11 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230714181611.GB510453@perftesting> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9a4890026719e5d6dc16ee9338f309f3fa452d16.1688927487.git.sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
On Sun, Jul 09, 2023 at 02:53:38PM -0400, Sweet Tea Dorminy wrote:
> For extent-based encryption, leaf/regular file inodes are special: it's
> useful to set their i_crypt_info field so that it's easy to inherit
> their encryption policy for a new extent, but they never need to do any
> encyption themselves. Additionally, since encryption can only be set up
> on a directory, not a single file, their encryption policy can always
> duplicate their parent inode's policy.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sweet Tea Dorminy <sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me>
> ---
> fs/crypto/fscrypt_private.h | 17 +++++++++++++
> fs/crypto/keysetup.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 2 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/crypto/fscrypt_private.h b/fs/crypto/fscrypt_private.h
> index c04454c289fd..260635e8b558 100644
> --- a/fs/crypto/fscrypt_private.h
> +++ b/fs/crypto/fscrypt_private.h
> @@ -308,6 +308,23 @@ fscrypt_get_lblk_info(const struct inode *inode, u64 lblk, u64 *offset,
> return inode->i_crypt_info;
> }
>
> +/**
> + * fscrypt_uses_extent_encryption() -- whether an inode uses per-extent
> + * encryption
> + *
> + * @inode: the inode in question
> + *
> + * Return: true if the inode uses per-extent fscrypt_infos, false otherwise
> + */
> +static inline bool fscrypt_uses_extent_encryption(const struct inode *inode)
> +{
> + // Non-regular files don't have extents
> + if (!S_ISREG(inode->i_mode))
> + return false;
> +
> + // No filesystems currently use per-extent infos
> + return false;
Wrong comment format.
> +}
>
> /* crypto.c */
> extern struct kmem_cache *fscrypt_info_cachep;
> diff --git a/fs/crypto/keysetup.c b/fs/crypto/keysetup.c
> index c5f68cf65a6f..7469b2d8ac87 100644
> --- a/fs/crypto/keysetup.c
> +++ b/fs/crypto/keysetup.c
> @@ -747,27 +747,48 @@ fscrypt_setup_encryption_info(struct inode *inode,
> int fscrypt_get_encryption_info(struct inode *inode, bool allow_unsupported)
> {
> int res;
> - union fscrypt_context ctx;
> + union fscrypt_context ctx = { 0 };
> union fscrypt_policy policy;
>
> if (fscrypt_has_encryption_key(inode))
> return 0;
>
> - res = inode->i_sb->s_cop->get_context(inode, &ctx, sizeof(ctx));
> - if (res < 0) {
> - if (res == -ERANGE && allow_unsupported)
> - return 0;
> - fscrypt_warn(inode, "Error %d getting encryption context", res);
> - return res;
> - }
> + if (fscrypt_uses_extent_encryption(inode)) {
> + /*
> + * Nothing will be encrypted with this info, so we can borrow
> + * the parent (dir) inode's policy and use a zero nonce.
> + */
> + struct dentry *dentry = d_find_any_alias(inode);
> + struct dentry *parent_dentry = dget_parent(dentry);
> + struct inode *dir = parent_dentry->d_inode;
> + bool found = false;
>
Can this be extracted to a helper to keep this function cleaner? Thanks,
Josef
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-14 18:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-09 18:53 [PATCH v2 00/14] fscrypt: add extent encryption Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-07-09 18:53 ` [PATCH v2 01/14] fscrypt: factor helper for locking master key Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-07-09 18:53 ` [PATCH v2 02/14] fscrypt: factor getting info for a specific block Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-07-09 18:53 ` [PATCH v2 03/14] fscrypt: adjust effective lblks based on extents Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-07-14 18:13 ` Josef Bacik
2023-07-09 18:53 ` [PATCH v2 04/14] fscrypt: add a super_block pointer to fscrypt_info Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-07-09 18:53 ` [PATCH v2 05/14] fscrypt: setup leaf inodes for extent encryption Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-07-14 18:16 ` Josef Bacik [this message]
2023-07-09 18:53 ` [PATCH v2 06/14] fscrypt: allow infos to be owned by extents Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-07-09 18:53 ` [PATCH v2 07/14] fscrypt: notify per-extent infos if master key vanishes Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-07-17 14:54 ` Josef Bacik
2023-07-09 18:53 ` [PATCH v2 08/14] fscrypt: use an optional ino equivalent for per-extent infos Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-07-09 18:53 ` [PATCH v2 09/14] fscrypt: move function call warning of busy inodes Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-07-17 14:59 ` Josef Bacik
2023-07-09 18:53 ` [PATCH v2 10/14] fscrypt: revamp key removal for extent encryption Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-07-17 15:18 ` Josef Bacik
2023-07-09 18:53 ` [PATCH v2 11/14] fscrypt: add creation/usage/freeing of per-extent infos Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-07-17 15:21 ` Josef Bacik
2023-07-09 18:53 ` [PATCH v2 12/14] fscrypt: allow load/save of extent contexts Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-07-17 15:23 ` Josef Bacik
2023-07-09 18:53 ` [PATCH v2 13/14] fscrypt: save session key credentials for extent infos Sweet Tea Dorminy
2023-07-17 14:31 ` Josef Bacik
2023-07-09 18:53 ` [PATCH v2 14/14] fscrypt: update documentation for per-extent keys Sweet Tea Dorminy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20230714181611.GB510453@perftesting \
--to=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=clm@fb.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sweettea-kernel@dorminy.me \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).