Linux FSCRYPT development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fscrypt: Avoid dynamic allocation in fscrypt_get_devices()
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2026 10:45:58 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260720174558.GC1865@quark> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260719055602.78828-1-ebiggers@kernel.org>

On Sat, Jul 18, 2026 at 10:56:02PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> When a blk_crypto_key starts being used or is evicted, fs/crypto/ calls
> fscrypt_get_devices() to get the filesystem's list of block devices,
> then iterates over them and calls blk_crypto_config_supported(),
> blk_crypto_start_using_key(), or blk_crypto_evict_key() on each one.
> 
> Currently, the block device pointers are placed in a dynamically
> allocated array.  This dynamic allocation is problematic because:
> 
> - It can fail, especially at the fscrypt_destroy_inline_crypt_key() call
>   site when it's invoked for inode eviction under direct reclaim.
> 
> - fscrypt_destroy_inline_crypt_key() doesn't handle the failure.  It
>   just zeroizes and frees the blk_crypto_key without calling
>   blk_crypto_evict_key().  That causes a use-after-free.
> 
> For now, let's fix this in the straightforward and easily-backportable
> way by switching to an on-stack array.  Currently the fscrypt
> multi-device functionality is used only by f2fs, which has a hardcoded
> limit of 8 block devices.  An on-stack array works fine for that.
> 
> (Of course, this solution won't scale up to large number of block
> devices.  For that we'd need a different solution, like moving the block
> device iteration into the filesystem.  Or in the case of btrfs, which
> will only support blk-crypto-fallback, we should make it just call
> blk-crypto-fallback directly, so the block devices won't be needed.)
> 
> Fixes: 22e9947a4b2b ("fscrypt: stop holding extra request_queue references")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
> ---

Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/fscrypt/linux.git/log/?h=for-current

- Eric

      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-20 17:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-19  5:56 [PATCH] fscrypt: Avoid dynamic allocation in fscrypt_get_devices() Eric Biggers
2026-07-20  9:23 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-07-20 17:45 ` Eric Biggers [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260720174558.GC1865@quark \
    --to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox