From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng1024@gmail.com>
Cc: "Theodore Y. Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>,
linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com>,
stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fscrypt: use the mount idmap for the owner check in fscrypt_ioctl_set_policy()
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2026 21:24:08 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260729042408.GA1705@sol> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260726043406.GA1708@sol>
On Sat, Jul 25, 2026 at 09:34:06PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> [+Cc linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org]
>
> On Sat, Jul 25, 2026 at 04:00:04PM +0800, Zhan Xusheng wrote:
> > From: Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com>
> >
> > fscrypt_ioctl_set_policy() calls inode_owner_or_capable() with
> > &nop_mnt_idmap before allowing an encryption policy to be set, instead of
> > the idmap of the mount the ioctl was issued on.
> >
> > fscrypt is used by filesystems that support idmapped mounts (e.g. ext4,
> > f2fs), so on such a mount this compares the caller's fsuid against the
> > unmapped on-disk owner rather than the mapped owner: the actual owner can
> > be wrongly denied with -EACCES and an unrelated caller wrongly allowed.
> > Use file_mnt_idmap(filp) instead.
> >
> > Fixes: 01beba7957a2 ("fs: port inode_owner_or_capable() to mnt_idmap")
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> > Signed-off-by: Zhan Xusheng <zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com>
> > ---
> > fs/crypto/policy.c | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/fs/crypto/policy.c b/fs/crypto/policy.c
> > index 9915e39362db..c80b24a941ad 100644
> > --- a/fs/crypto/policy.c
> > +++ b/fs/crypto/policy.c
> > @@ -534,7 +534,7 @@ int fscrypt_ioctl_set_policy(struct file *filp, const void __user *arg)
> > return -EFAULT;
> > policy.version = version;
> >
> > - if (!inode_owner_or_capable(&nop_mnt_idmap, inode))
> > + if (!inode_owner_or_capable(file_mnt_idmap(filp), inode))
> > return -EACCES;
> >
> > ret = mnt_want_write_file(filp);
> > --
> > 2.43.0
>
> Thanks. I don't think the Fixes commit is quite right: 01beba7957a2
> seems to have been a behavior-preserving commit. It even says that it
> was "eliminating the possibility of any bugs" :-)
>
> Really it seems a patch to this function was just missing entirely, but
> I would probably use 14f3db5542e6 ("ext4: support idmapped mounts").
> That's when the other ext4 ioctls got converted to use
> file_mnt_user_ns() and the idmap support was enabled on ext4, but this
> was missed. (And ext4 was the first fscrypt-capable filesystem to get
> idmap support.) As usual, this also needs 'Cc stable'.
>
> I guess I'll plan to take this through the fscrypt tree. I'll update
> the tags when committing if there's no other feedback.
Applied to https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/fs/fscrypt/linux.git/log/?h=for-current
- Eric
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-29 4:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-25 8:00 [PATCH] fscrypt: use the mount idmap for the owner check in fscrypt_ioctl_set_policy() Zhan Xusheng
2026-07-26 4:34 ` Eric Biggers
2026-07-29 4:24 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260729042408.GA1705@sol \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=zhanxusheng1024@gmail.com \
--cc=zhanxusheng@xiaomi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox