Linux FSCRYPT development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jes Sorensen <jes@trained-monkey.org>
To: linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>,
	Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Subject: fsverity PAGE_SIZE constraints
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2020 16:13:45 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <69713333-8072-adf0-a6bb-8f73b3c390d0@trained-monkey.org> (raw)

Hi,

I am working on adding fsverity support to RPM and I am hitting a tricky
problem. I am see this with RPM, but it really isn't specific to RPM,
and will apply to any method for distribution signatures.

fsverity is currently hard-wiring the Merkle tree block size to
PAGE_SIZE. This is problematic for a number of reasons, in particular on
architectures that can be configured with different page sizes, such as
ARM, as well as the case where someone generates a shared 'common'
package to be used cross architectures (noarch package in RPM terms).

For a package manager to be able to create a generic package with
signatures, it basically has to build a signature for every supported
page size of the target architecture.

Chris Mason is working on adding fsverity support to btrfs, and I
understand he is supporting 4K as the default Merkle tree block size,
independent of the PAGE_SIZE.

Would it be feasible to make ext4 and other file systems support 4K for
non 4K page sized systems and make that a general recommendation going
forward?

Thoughts?

Thanks,
Jes

             reply	other threads:[~2020-06-01 20:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-01 20:13 Jes Sorensen [this message]
2020-06-01 20:36 ` fsverity PAGE_SIZE constraints Eric Biggers
2020-06-02 15:49   ` Chris Mason
2020-06-02 21:50     ` Eric Biggers
2020-06-03 13:57       ` Chris Mason

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=69713333-8072-adf0-a6bb-8f73b3c390d0@trained-monkey.org \
    --to=jes@trained-monkey.org \
    --cc=clm@fb.com \
    --cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox