From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: From: Chandan Rajendra Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 02/14] Consolidate "post read processing" into a new file Date: Wed, 24 Apr 2019 20:29:10 +0530 In-Reply-To: <20190424142423.GA12761@infradead.org> References: <20190424043730.13683-1-chandan@linux.ibm.com> <6353008.fQNhCuxumZ@localhost.localdomain> <20190424142423.GA12761@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Message-Id: <7402364.ucYHGh3o57@localhost.localdomain> To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, tytso@mit.edu, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca, ebiggers@kernel.org, jaegeuk@kernel.org, yuchao0@huawei.com List-ID: On Wednesday, April 24, 2019 7:54:23 PM IST Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 03:34:17PM +0530, Chandan Rajendra wrote: > > To clarify, Are you suggesting that a new kconfig option (say > > CONFIG_FS_READ_CALLBACKS) be provided to the user so that the following could > > occur, > > > > 1. User selects CONFIG_FS_ENCRYPTION and/or CONFIG_FS_VERITY and this causes > > CONFIG_FS_READ_CALLBACKS to be set to 'y'. > > 2. User selects CONFIG_FS_READ_CALLBACKS explicitly. > > If you don't add a user description to a Kconfig entry it won't be > visible to users, but only selectable by other options. That is what > I suggest. > > Thanks for the clarification. I will make the necessary changes. -- chandan