public inbox for linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-api@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fscrypt: remove kernel-internal constants from UAPI header
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 11:49:41 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <X7LX1RGLo/5NnHKE@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201024005132.495952-1-ebiggers@kernel.org>

On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 05:51:31PM -0700, Eric Biggers wrote:
> From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>
> 
> There isn't really any valid reason to use __FSCRYPT_MODE_MAX or
> FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAGS_VALID in a userspace program.  These constants are
> only meant to be used by the kernel internally, and they are defined in
> the UAPI header next to the mode numbers and flags only so that kernel
> developers don't forget to update them when adding new modes or flags.
> 
> In https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201005074133.1958633-2-satyat@google.com
> there was an example of someone wanting to use __FSCRYPT_MODE_MAX in a
> user program, and it was wrong because the program would have broken if
> __FSCRYPT_MODE_MAX were ever increased.  So having this definition
> available is harmful.  FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAGS_VALID has the same problem.
> 
> So, remove these definitions from the UAPI header.  Replace
> FSCRYPT_POLICY_FLAGS_VALID with just listing the valid flags explicitly
> in the one kernel function that needs it.  Move __FSCRYPT_MODE_MAX to
> fscrypt_private.h, remove the double underscores (which were only
> present to discourage use by userspace), and add a BUILD_BUG_ON() and
> comments to (hopefully) ensure it is kept in sync.
> 
> Keep the old name FS_POLICY_FLAGS_VALID, since it's been around for
> longer and there's a greater chance that removing it would break source
> compatibility with some program.  Indeed, mtd-utils is using it in
> an #ifdef, and removing it would introduce compiler warnings (about
> FS_POLICY_FLAGS_PAD_* being redefined) into the mtd-utils build.
> However, reduce its value to 0x07 so that it only includes the flags
> with old names (the ones present before Linux 5.4), and try to make it
> clear that it's now "frozen" and no new flags should be added to it.
> 
> Fixes: 2336d0deb2d4 ("fscrypt: use FSCRYPT_ prefix for uapi constants")
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v5.4+
> Signed-off-by: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>

Applied to fscrypt.git#master for 5.11.

- Eric

      reply	other threads:[~2020-11-16 19:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-24  0:51 [PATCH] fscrypt: remove kernel-internal constants from UAPI header Eric Biggers
2020-11-16 19:49 ` Eric Biggers [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=X7LX1RGLo/5NnHKE@sol.localdomain \
    --to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-api@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox