From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] ima: support fs-verity file digest based signatures
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 20:48:06 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yd0MBkL9J5CGF0W9@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b4105f9b-98f7-f941-47db-2f72e0c5b8bd@linux.ibm.com>
On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 10:26:23PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
>
> On 1/10/22 17:45, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 09, 2022 at 01:55:16PM -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > > + case IMA_VERITY_DIGSIG:
> > > + set_bit(IMA_DIGSIG, &iint->atomic_flags);
> > > +
> > > + algo = iint->ima_hash->algo;
> > > + hash = kzalloc(sizeof(*hash) + hash_digest_size[algo],
> > > + GFP_KERNEL);
> > > + if (!hash) {
> > > + *cause = "verity-hashing-error";
> > > + *status = INTEGRITY_FAIL;
> > > + break;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + rc = calc_tbs_hash(IMA_VERITY_DIGSIG, iint->ima_hash->algo,
> > > + iint->ima_hash->digest, hash);
> > > + if (rc) {
> > > + *cause = "verity-hashing-error";
> > > + *status = INTEGRITY_FAIL;
> > > + break;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + rc = integrity_digsig_verify(INTEGRITY_KEYRING_IMA,
> > > + (const char *)xattr_value,
> > > + xattr_len, hash->digest,
> > > + hash->length);
> > This is still verifying a raw hash value, which is wrong as I've explained
> > several times. Yes, you are now hashing the hash algorithm ID together with the
> > original hash value, but at the end the thing being signed/verified is still a
> > raw hash value, which is ambigious.
> >
> > I think I see where the confusion is. If rsa-pkcs1pad is used, then the
> > asymmetric algorithm is parameterized by a hash algorithm, and this hash
> > algorithm's identifier is automatically built-in to the data which is
> > signed/verified. And the data being signed/verified is assumed to be a hash
> > value of the same type. So in this case, the caller doesn't need to handle
> > disambiguating raw hashes.
> >
> > However, asymmetric_verify() also supports ecdsa and ecrdsa signatures. As far
> > as I can tell, those do *not* have the hash algorithm identifier built-in to the
> > data which is signed/verified; they just sign/verify the data given. That
>
>
> The signatures are generated by evmctl by this code here, which works for
> RSA and ECDSA and likely also ECRDSA:
>
> https://sourceforge.net/p/linux-ima/ima-evm-utils/ci/master/tree/src/libimaevm.c#l1036
>
> if (!EVP_PKEY_sign_init(ctx))
> goto err;
> st = "EVP_get_digestbyname";
> if (!(md = EVP_get_digestbyname(algo)))
> goto err;
> st = "EVP_PKEY_CTX_set_signature_md";
> if (!EVP_PKEY_CTX_set_signature_md(ctx, md))
> goto err;
> st = "EVP_PKEY_sign";
> sigsize = MAX_SIGNATURE_SIZE - sizeof(struct signature_v2_hdr) - 1;
> if (!EVP_PKEY_sign(ctx, hdr->sig, &sigsize, hash, size))
> goto err;
> len = (int)sigsize;
>
> As far as I know, these are not raw signatures but generate the OIDs for RSA
> + shaXYZ or ECDSA + shaXYZ (1.2.840.10045.4.1 et al) and prepend them to the
> hash and then sign that.
As I said, this appears to be true for RSA but not for ECDSA or ECRDSA.
- Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-01-11 4:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-01-09 18:55 [PATCH v2 0/6] ima: support fs-verity digests and signatures Mimi Zohar
2022-01-09 18:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] ima: rename IMA_ACTION_FLAGS to IMA_NONACTION_FLAGS Mimi Zohar
2022-01-09 18:55 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] fs-verity: define a function to return the integrity protected file digest Mimi Zohar
2022-01-10 0:47 ` Vitaly Chikunov
2022-01-10 12:13 ` Mimi Zohar
2022-01-10 22:15 ` Eric Biggers
2022-01-09 18:55 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] ima: define a new template field 'd-type' and a new template 'ima-ngv2' Mimi Zohar
2022-01-09 18:55 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] ima: include fsverity's file digests in the IMA measurement list Mimi Zohar
2022-01-09 18:55 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] ima: support fs-verity file digest based signatures Mimi Zohar
2022-01-10 1:24 ` Vitaly Chikunov
2022-01-10 12:12 ` Mimi Zohar
2022-01-10 22:45 ` Eric Biggers
2022-01-11 3:26 ` Stefan Berger
2022-01-11 4:48 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2022-01-09 18:55 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] fsverity: update the documentation Mimi Zohar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Yd0MBkL9J5CGF0W9@sol.localdomain \
--to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=stefanb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox