public inbox for linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
	linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] ima: support fs-verity file digest based signatures
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2022 20:48:06 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Yd0MBkL9J5CGF0W9@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b4105f9b-98f7-f941-47db-2f72e0c5b8bd@linux.ibm.com>

On Mon, Jan 10, 2022 at 10:26:23PM -0500, Stefan Berger wrote:
> 
> On 1/10/22 17:45, Eric Biggers wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 09, 2022 at 01:55:16PM -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> > > +	case IMA_VERITY_DIGSIG:
> > > +		set_bit(IMA_DIGSIG, &iint->atomic_flags);
> > > +
> > > +		algo = iint->ima_hash->algo;
> > > +		hash = kzalloc(sizeof(*hash) + hash_digest_size[algo],
> > > +			       GFP_KERNEL);
> > > +		if (!hash) {
> > > +			*cause = "verity-hashing-error";
> > > +			*status = INTEGRITY_FAIL;
> > > +			break;
> > > +		}
> > > +
> > > +		rc = calc_tbs_hash(IMA_VERITY_DIGSIG, iint->ima_hash->algo,
> > > +				   iint->ima_hash->digest, hash);
> > > +		if (rc) {
> > > +			*cause = "verity-hashing-error";
> > > +			*status = INTEGRITY_FAIL;
> > > +			break;
> > > +		}
> > > +
> > > +		rc = integrity_digsig_verify(INTEGRITY_KEYRING_IMA,
> > > +					     (const char *)xattr_value,
> > > +					     xattr_len, hash->digest,
> > > +					     hash->length);
> > This is still verifying a raw hash value, which is wrong as I've explained
> > several times.  Yes, you are now hashing the hash algorithm ID together with the
> > original hash value, but at the end the thing being signed/verified is still a
> > raw hash value, which is ambigious.
> > 
> > I think I see where the confusion is.  If rsa-pkcs1pad is used, then the
> > asymmetric algorithm is parameterized by a hash algorithm, and this hash
> > algorithm's identifier is automatically built-in to the data which is
> > signed/verified.  And the data being signed/verified is assumed to be a hash
> > value of the same type.  So in this case, the caller doesn't need to handle
> > disambiguating raw hashes.
> > 
> > However, asymmetric_verify() also supports ecdsa and ecrdsa signatures.  As far
> > as I can tell, those do *not* have the hash algorithm identifier built-in to the
> > data which is signed/verified; they just sign/verify the data given.  That
> 
> 
> The signatures are generated by evmctl by this code here, which works for
> RSA and ECDSA and likely also ECRDSA:
> 
> https://sourceforge.net/p/linux-ima/ima-evm-utils/ci/master/tree/src/libimaevm.c#l1036
> 
>    if (!EVP_PKEY_sign_init(ctx))
>         goto err;
>     st = "EVP_get_digestbyname";
>     if (!(md = EVP_get_digestbyname(algo)))
>         goto err;
>     st = "EVP_PKEY_CTX_set_signature_md";
>     if (!EVP_PKEY_CTX_set_signature_md(ctx, md))
>         goto err;
>     st = "EVP_PKEY_sign";
>     sigsize = MAX_SIGNATURE_SIZE - sizeof(struct signature_v2_hdr) - 1;
>     if (!EVP_PKEY_sign(ctx, hdr->sig, &sigsize, hash, size))
>         goto err;
>     len = (int)sigsize;
> 
> As far as I know, these are not raw signatures but generate the OIDs for RSA
> + shaXYZ or ECDSA + shaXYZ (1.2.840.10045.4.1 et al) and prepend them to the
> hash and then sign that.

As I said, this appears to be true for RSA but not for ECDSA or ECRDSA.

- Eric

  reply	other threads:[~2022-01-11  4:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-01-09 18:55 [PATCH v2 0/6] ima: support fs-verity digests and signatures Mimi Zohar
2022-01-09 18:55 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] ima: rename IMA_ACTION_FLAGS to IMA_NONACTION_FLAGS Mimi Zohar
2022-01-09 18:55 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] fs-verity: define a function to return the integrity protected file digest Mimi Zohar
2022-01-10  0:47   ` Vitaly Chikunov
2022-01-10 12:13     ` Mimi Zohar
2022-01-10 22:15   ` Eric Biggers
2022-01-09 18:55 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] ima: define a new template field 'd-type' and a new template 'ima-ngv2' Mimi Zohar
2022-01-09 18:55 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] ima: include fsverity's file digests in the IMA measurement list Mimi Zohar
2022-01-09 18:55 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] ima: support fs-verity file digest based signatures Mimi Zohar
2022-01-10  1:24   ` Vitaly Chikunov
2022-01-10 12:12     ` Mimi Zohar
2022-01-10 22:45   ` Eric Biggers
2022-01-11  3:26     ` Stefan Berger
2022-01-11  4:48       ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2022-01-09 18:55 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] fsverity: update the documentation Mimi Zohar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Yd0MBkL9J5CGF0W9@sol.localdomain \
    --to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stefanb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox