From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="10U2V6iy" Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [IPv6:2607:7c80:54:3::133]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 356958E; Mon, 11 Dec 2023 08:42:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=i2yTXhZ98lJELJnDUOhyYRgpOtbhX9CT8JLckwmAl/Q=; b=10U2V6iyB8Karqp48moMv+oDlg l0eo/emwTWSVjCKHM0HnG6FG1tVr0aO7ecr8t+QpTSRGEOoGVKIsOyJRo4jzeCkTmyqFyiSGTMpuq RqJ5VoSr4VCkhirUxDpqYooGk4lu+0d7J0ezL5UVI9XEnr1DHFP6rUyr/SLonlAbL6qnuUl6dYzco 1Aa1wywcBTWg+5aIDDczv7K33DmN8LwkFC1LnVc/O91bJv5VwasPlyD6Ceib3UV0OG//e9Iamkk/Z kUQGsTa503UHT760y/I1zgoCWVM1nndt5wlI9NjinJNjIqkhS9gPFh4lT8yS3iTgB7J/2EbXOLpLY PiN9l6Aw==; Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.96 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1rCjMe-005vGF-38; Mon, 11 Dec 2023 16:42:40 +0000 Date: Mon, 11 Dec 2023 08:42:40 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Eric Biggers Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, Josef Bacik Subject: Re: [PATCH] fscrypt: move the call to fscrypt_destroy_keyring() into ->put_super() Message-ID: References: <20231206001325.13676-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> <20231206064430.GA41771@sol.localdomain> <20231209212938.GA2270@sol.localdomain> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20231209212938.GA2270@sol.localdomain> X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html On Sat, Dec 09, 2023 at 01:29:38PM -0800, Eric Biggers wrote: > btrfs releases its block devices in ->put_super(), so with your proposal that > would need to be moved to ->kill_sb() as well, right? Yes. I actually sent a patch for that in August: https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg138572.html but it somehow got lost in the usual mess of btrfs trees and Dave not wanting to Ack picking it up through the VFS tree with the rest of the series.