From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Baokun Li" <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: tytso@mit.edu, linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/13] blk-crypto: support data units larger than a page
Date: Sun, 11 Oct 2026 17:27:13 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-167350@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261011170958.1759230-7-libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>
> blk-crypto-fallback requires each data unit to be contained in a single
> bio_vec, and fails a bio with a larger data unit with BLK_STS_INVAL.
> fscrypt uses the filesystem block size as its data unit size, so
> encrypted files are unusable on filesystems with a block size larger
> than the page size; the write failure is silent and loses the data.
>
> Since commit 5acc6f649a68 ("fscrypt: Always use blk-crypto for
> contents on block-based filesystems") there is no fs-layer path left.
> Fix this by describing a data unit by one bio_vec per page: data units
> that fit keep using the bio_vec and the scatterlists in the data unit
> context, and larger ones get arrays from the new blk_crypto_du_ctx_pool.
>
> The pool is a mempool backed by a dedicated slab cache, as kmalloc()
> would round the element size up to the next power of two. It is set
> up when a key with such a data unit size is first used, and one array
> is reused for all data units of a bio.
>
> A data unit must start at a data unit boundary (a page boundary for a
> larger one), and the accepted data unit sizes grow to the number of
> pages that fit in one encrypted bio, rounded down to a power of two.
> An encrypted bio can run out of room before the source bio ends; free
> its unused bounce pages with the new blk_crypto_free_enc_pages().
>
> One crypto request per data unit is kept, so the ciphertext of data
> units that fit in a page is unchanged, and larger data units produce
> the same ciphertext as inline encryption hardware.
>
> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun@linux.alibaba.com>
Sashiko has reviewed this patch and found no issues. It looks great!
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261011170958.1759230-1-libaokun@linux.alibaba.com?part=6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-11 17:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-11 17:09 [PATCH 00/13] block, ext4: allow encryption with a block size larger than the page size Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 01/13] ext4: refuse encryption when block size > " Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 02/13] ext4: reject encrypted inodes " Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:16 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 03/13] blk-crypto: reject fallback data unit sizes it can't handle Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 7:50 ` Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 04/13] blk-crypto: decrypt one data unit per crypto request Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:19 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 05/13] blk-crypto: encrypt " Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:26 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 06/13] blk-crypto: support data units larger than a page Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:27 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 07/13] iomap: align the direct I/O bios of encrypted files to the block size Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 08/13] block: split encrypted bios at data unit boundaries Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:20 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 09/13] block: warn about bios that can't be split Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 10/13] block: don't require data unit aligned bio_vecs for encrypted bios Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-12 8:09 ` Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 11/13] ext4: allow encryption with a block size larger than the page size Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:30 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 12/13] ext4: send folios that cover a wraparound to the buffer_head path Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-11 17:09 ` [PATCH 13/13] ext4: allow large folios for encrypted files Baokun Li
2026-10-11 17:23 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-167350@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=libaokun@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox