From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1273EEB64DA for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 15:25:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231725AbjFSPZE (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jun 2023 11:25:04 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:39514 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231691AbjFSPYu (ORCPT ); Mon, 19 Jun 2023 11:24:50 -0400 Received: from mail-il1-f207.google.com (mail-il1-f207.google.com [209.85.166.207]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1F8710D for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 08:24:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-il1-f207.google.com with SMTP id e9e14a558f8ab-341de9586d4so30567415ab.2 for ; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 08:24:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1687188287; x=1689780287; h=to:from:subject:message-id:date:mime-version:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=dd9mLnsTgoIMT3DnkpH3y2thLKhOTY9gRQ8MaRlhcyY=; b=XKPTpppca0gCCgKzdkDLv90/76198YACOxhwzeCQxXQSdbpnjML0nGRFGAb4HF0kK+ AY8mDQzYnd79I94RGDbUcSXdRWVouSUaXvlGB9vFQVCLZXfkEZaUxWjqFrbFk9DT7jd2 sWFj5LA6vylrIgAgCP7AgkC+N7g5O2L1YtSfHCNLMzsgVpWjr5hsM828AvscbmPqDsED jIVOqGmdeA8PLY9ugYXFrpUAtM7iWM7XjikM6gZuFmHtZZBIBbxIx7b+aGbGfzUG3j3f LK795hYZYl99WWH28shxt0ZQhKdDV6P993tr49g97nOuch8FSmkQjwichcXn4kS/zv4L G3bw== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDxZsK4lW9GHJdoZLkQNGTk3SCH3AzOauXfE+QEXRkdsCB+RMBFx 4Drca8V6rzJFmT2UNmwmTzsRuCBlcyaJRG7wjEN6yX3qqIaEO6sV9A== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ78A6gGKmXn+JLgBm1Cp8SVfVMxu4juCBP2/hsbcEcaXcVbAIwcZJoZXZTWK1vTwS9MlBZse2MePa++xLq0ej/4kjY4tALQ MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 2002:a92:d4ce:0:b0:331:3c0d:5a20 with SMTP id o14-20020a92d4ce000000b003313c0d5a20mr2996028ilm.0.1687188287205; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 08:24:47 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2023 08:24:47 -0700 X-Google-Appengine-App-Id: s~syzkaller X-Google-Appengine-App-Id-Alias: syzkaller Message-ID: <000000000000873a0f05fe7d2229@google.com> Subject: [syzbot] [reiserfs?] possible deadlock in vfs_removexattr From: syzbot To: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, reiserfs-devel@vger.kernel.org, syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Hello, syzbot found the following issue on: HEAD commit: f86b85033b8c Merge branch 'for-next/core', remote-tracking.. git tree: git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/arm64/linux.git for-kernelci console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=11590ef7280000 kernel config: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/.config?x=bd4213541e5ab26f dashboard link: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=309478c06ab5fcc08e1f compiler: Debian clang version 15.0.7, GNU ld (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.35.2 userspace arch: arm64 Unfortunately, I don't have any reproducer for this issue yet. Downloadable assets: disk image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/3b1a81c2e44b/disk-f86b8503.raw.xz vmlinux: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/2cda1b607bbd/vmlinux-f86b8503.xz kernel image: https://storage.googleapis.com/syzbot-assets/fcac528565e1/Image-f86b8503.gz.xz IMPORTANT: if you fix the issue, please add the following tag to the commit: Reported-by: syzbot+309478c06ab5fcc08e1f@syzkaller.appspotmail.com REISERFS (device loop2): using 3.5.x disk format REISERFS warning (device loop2): jdm-13090 reiserfs_new_inode: ACLs aren't enabled in the fs, but vfs thinks they are! REISERFS (device loop2): Created .reiserfs_priv - reserved for xattr storage. ====================================================== WARNING: possible circular locking dependency detected 6.4.0-rc5-syzkaller-gf86b85033b8c #0 Not tainted ------------------------------------------------------ syz-executor.2/7662 is trying to acquire lock: ffff00012da302e0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#15){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:775 [inline] ffff00012da302e0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#15){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: vfs_removexattr+0xcc/0x23c fs/xattr.c:575 but task is already holding lock: ffff0000da4de460 (sb_writers#23){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write_file+0x64/0x1e8 fs/namespace.c:438 which lock already depends on the new lock. the existing dependency chain (in reverse order) is: -> #2 (sb_writers#23){.+.+}-{0:0}: percpu_down_read include/linux/percpu-rwsem.h:51 [inline] __sb_start_write include/linux/fs.h:1494 [inline] sb_start_write+0x60/0x2ec include/linux/fs.h:1569 mnt_want_write_file+0x64/0x1e8 fs/namespace.c:438 reiserfs_ioctl+0x184/0x454 fs/reiserfs/ioctl.c:103 vfs_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:51 [inline] __do_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:870 [inline] __se_sys_ioctl fs/ioctl.c:856 [inline] __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x14c/0x1c8 fs/ioctl.c:856 __invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline] invoke_syscall+0x98/0x2c0 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 el0_svc_common+0x138/0x244 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:142 do_el0_svc+0x64/0x198 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:191 el0_svc+0x4c/0x160 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:647 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xfc arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:665 el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:591 -> #1 (&sbi->lock){+.+.}-{3:3}: __mutex_lock_common+0x190/0x21a0 kernel/locking/mutex.c:603 __mutex_lock kernel/locking/mutex.c:747 [inline] mutex_lock_nested+0x2c/0x38 kernel/locking/mutex.c:799 reiserfs_write_lock+0x7c/0xe8 fs/reiserfs/lock.c:27 reiserfs_lookup+0x128/0x45c fs/reiserfs/namei.c:364 __lookup_slow+0x250/0x374 fs/namei.c:1690 lookup_one_len+0x178/0x28c fs/namei.c:2742 reiserfs_lookup_privroot+0x8c/0x184 fs/reiserfs/xattr.c:976 reiserfs_fill_super+0x15b4/0x2028 fs/reiserfs/super.c:2192 mount_bdev+0x274/0x370 fs/super.c:1380 get_super_block+0x44/0x58 fs/reiserfs/super.c:2601 legacy_get_tree+0xd4/0x16c fs/fs_context.c:610 vfs_get_tree+0x90/0x274 fs/super.c:1510 do_new_mount+0x25c/0x8c4 fs/namespace.c:3039 path_mount+0x590/0xe04 fs/namespace.c:3369 do_mount fs/namespace.c:3382 [inline] __do_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3591 [inline] __se_sys_mount fs/namespace.c:3568 [inline] __arm64_sys_mount+0x45c/0x594 fs/namespace.c:3568 __invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline] invoke_syscall+0x98/0x2c0 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 el0_svc_common+0x138/0x244 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:142 do_el0_svc+0x64/0x198 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:191 el0_svc+0x4c/0x160 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:647 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xfc arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:665 el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:591 -> #0 (&type->i_mutex_dir_key#15){+.+.}-{3:3}: check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3113 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3232 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3847 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x3308/0x7604 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5088 lock_acquire+0x23c/0x71c kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5705 down_write+0x50/0xc0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1573 inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:775 [inline] vfs_removexattr+0xcc/0x23c fs/xattr.c:575 removexattr+0x148/0x1c4 fs/xattr.c:918 __do_sys_fremovexattr fs/xattr.c:965 [inline] __se_sys_fremovexattr fs/xattr.c:955 [inline] __arm64_sys_fremovexattr+0x14c/0x1c4 fs/xattr.c:955 __invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline] invoke_syscall+0x98/0x2c0 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 el0_svc_common+0x138/0x244 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:142 do_el0_svc+0x64/0x198 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:191 el0_svc+0x4c/0x160 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:647 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xfc arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:665 el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:591 other info that might help us debug this: Chain exists of: &type->i_mutex_dir_key#15 --> &sbi->lock --> sb_writers#23 Possible unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- rlock(sb_writers#23); lock(&sbi->lock); lock(sb_writers#23); lock(&type->i_mutex_dir_key#15); *** DEADLOCK *** 1 lock held by syz-executor.2/7662: #0: ffff0000da4de460 (sb_writers#23){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: mnt_want_write_file+0x64/0x1e8 fs/namespace.c:438 stack backtrace: CPU: 1 PID: 7662 Comm: syz-executor.2 Not tainted 6.4.0-rc5-syzkaller-gf86b85033b8c #0 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 05/25/2023 Call trace: dump_backtrace+0x1b8/0x1e4 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:233 show_stack+0x2c/0x44 arch/arm64/kernel/stacktrace.c:240 __dump_stack lib/dump_stack.c:88 [inline] dump_stack_lvl+0xd0/0x124 lib/dump_stack.c:106 dump_stack+0x1c/0x28 lib/dump_stack.c:113 print_circular_bug+0x150/0x1b8 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2066 check_noncircular+0x2cc/0x378 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2188 check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3113 [inline] check_prevs_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3232 [inline] validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3847 [inline] __lock_acquire+0x3308/0x7604 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5088 lock_acquire+0x23c/0x71c kernel/locking/lockdep.c:5705 down_write+0x50/0xc0 kernel/locking/rwsem.c:1573 inode_lock include/linux/fs.h:775 [inline] vfs_removexattr+0xcc/0x23c fs/xattr.c:575 removexattr+0x148/0x1c4 fs/xattr.c:918 __do_sys_fremovexattr fs/xattr.c:965 [inline] __se_sys_fremovexattr fs/xattr.c:955 [inline] __arm64_sys_fremovexattr+0x14c/0x1c4 fs/xattr.c:955 __invoke_syscall arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:38 [inline] invoke_syscall+0x98/0x2c0 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:52 el0_svc_common+0x138/0x244 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:142 do_el0_svc+0x64/0x198 arch/arm64/kernel/syscall.c:191 el0_svc+0x4c/0x160 arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:647 el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0xfc arch/arm64/kernel/entry-common.c:665 el0t_64_sync+0x190/0x194 arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S:591 --- This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors. See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot. syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com. syzbot will keep track of this issue. See: https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ#status for how to communicate with syzbot. If the bug is already fixed, let syzbot know by replying with: #syz fix: exact-commit-title If you want to change bug's subsystems, reply with: #syz set subsystems: new-subsystem (See the list of subsystem names on the web dashboard) If the bug is a duplicate of another bug, reply with: #syz dup: exact-subject-of-another-report If you want to undo deduplication, reply with: #syz undup