* [syzbot] Monthly btrfs report (Feb 2024)
@ 2024-02-09 20:57 syzbot
2024-02-10 8:48 ` Qu Wenruo
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: syzbot @ 2024-02-09 20:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: clm, dsterba, josef, linux-btrfs, linux-fsdevel, linux-kernel,
syzkaller-bugs
Hello btrfs maintainers/developers,
This is a 31-day syzbot report for the btrfs subsystem.
All related reports/information can be found at:
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/upstream/s/btrfs
During the period, 1 new issues were detected and 1 were fixed.
In total, 43 issues are still open and 51 have been fixed so far.
Some of the still happening issues:
Ref Crashes Repro Title
<1> 5804 Yes kernel BUG in close_ctree
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=2665d678fffcc4608e18
<2> 2636 Yes WARNING in btrfs_space_info_update_bytes_may_use
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=8edfa01e46fd9fe3fbfb
<3> 251 Yes INFO: task hung in lock_extent
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=eaa05fbc7563874b7ad2
<4> 245 Yes WARNING in btrfs_chunk_alloc
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=e8e56d5d31d38b5b47e7
<5> 224 Yes WARNING in btrfs_remove_chunk
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=e8582cc16881ec70a430
<6> 125 Yes kernel BUG in insert_state_fast
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=9ce4a36127ca92b59677
<7> 99 Yes kernel BUG in btrfs_free_tree_block
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=a306f914b4d01b3958fe
<8> 88 Yes kernel BUG in set_state_bits
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=b9d2e54d2301324657ed
<9> 79 Yes WARNING in btrfs_commit_transaction (2)
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=dafbca0e20fbc5946925
<10> 74 Yes WARNING in btrfs_put_transaction
https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=3706b1df47f2464f0c1e
---
This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.
To disable reminders for individual bugs, reply with the following command:
#syz set <Ref> no-reminders
To change bug's subsystems, reply with:
#syz set <Ref> subsystems: new-subsystem
You may send multiple commands in a single email message.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: [syzbot] Monthly btrfs report (Feb 2024)
2024-02-09 20:57 [syzbot] Monthly btrfs report (Feb 2024) syzbot
@ 2024-02-10 8:48 ` Qu Wenruo
2024-02-12 12:15 ` Aleksandr Nogikh
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Qu Wenruo @ 2024-02-10 8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: syzbot, clm, dsterba, josef, linux-btrfs, linux-fsdevel,
linux-kernel, syzkaller-bugs
On 2024/2/10 07:27, syzbot wrote:
> Hello btrfs maintainers/developers,
>
> This is a 31-day syzbot report for the btrfs subsystem.
> All related reports/information can be found at:
> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/upstream/s/btrfs
>
> During the period, 1 new issues were detected and 1 were fixed.
> In total, 43 issues are still open and 51 have been fixed so far.
>
> Some of the still happening issues:
>
> Ref Crashes Repro Title
> <1> 5804 Yes kernel BUG in close_ctree
> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=2665d678fffcc4608e18
I'm not sure why, but I never had a good experience reproducing the bug
using the C reproduer.
Furthermore, for this particular case, using that C reproducer only
reduced tons of duplicated dmesg of:
[ 162.264838] btrfs: Unknown parameter 'noinode_cache'
[ 162.308573] loop0: detected capacity change from 0 to 32768
[ 162.308964] btrfs: Unknown parameter 'noinode_cache'
[ 162.313582] loop1: detected capacity change from 0 to 32768
[ 162.314070] btrfs: Unknown parameter 'noinode_cache'
[ 162.323629] loop3: detected capacity change from 0 to 32768
[ 162.324000] btrfs: Unknown parameter 'noinode_cache'
[ 162.328046] loop2: detected capacity change from 0 to 32768
[ 162.328417] btrfs: Unknown parameter 'noinode_cache'
Unlike the latest report which shows a lot of other things.
Anyone can help verifying the C reproducer?
Or I'm doing something wrong withe the reproducer?
Thanks,
Qu
> <2> 2636 Yes WARNING in btrfs_space_info_update_bytes_may_use
> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=8edfa01e46fd9fe3fbfb
> <3> 251 Yes INFO: task hung in lock_extent
> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=eaa05fbc7563874b7ad2
> <4> 245 Yes WARNING in btrfs_chunk_alloc
> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=e8e56d5d31d38b5b47e7
> <5> 224 Yes WARNING in btrfs_remove_chunk
> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=e8582cc16881ec70a430
> <6> 125 Yes kernel BUG in insert_state_fast
> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=9ce4a36127ca92b59677
> <7> 99 Yes kernel BUG in btrfs_free_tree_block
> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=a306f914b4d01b3958fe
> <8> 88 Yes kernel BUG in set_state_bits
> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=b9d2e54d2301324657ed
> <9> 79 Yes WARNING in btrfs_commit_transaction (2)
> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=dafbca0e20fbc5946925
> <10> 74 Yes WARNING in btrfs_put_transaction
> https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=3706b1df47f2464f0c1e
>
> ---
> This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
> See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
> syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.
>
> To disable reminders for individual bugs, reply with the following command:
> #syz set <Ref> no-reminders
>
> To change bug's subsystems, reply with:
> #syz set <Ref> subsystems: new-subsystem
>
> You may send multiple commands in a single email message.
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: [syzbot] Monthly btrfs report (Feb 2024)
2024-02-10 8:48 ` Qu Wenruo
@ 2024-02-12 12:15 ` Aleksandr Nogikh
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Aleksandr Nogikh @ 2024-02-12 12:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Qu Wenruo
Cc: syzbot, clm, dsterba, josef, linux-btrfs, linux-fsdevel,
linux-kernel, syzkaller-bugs, Jan Kara
Hi,
It looks like existing reproducers for this bug began to fail after
CONFIG_BLK_DEV_WRITE_MOUNTED reached torvalds and syzbot has not found
a newer reproducer since then (though it does hit the bug, so it must
be possible even with CONFIG_BLK_DEV_WRITE_MOUNTED=n).
I was was able to reproduce it locally using the older kernel revision
built by syzbot:
https://gist.github.com/a-nogikh/f68aa687a72aad4bb46a64d995c2415f
FWIW here are the docs:
https://github.com/google/syzkaller/blob/master/docs/syzbot_assets.md
--
Aleksandr
On Sat, Feb 10, 2024 at 9:48 AM 'Qu Wenruo' via syzkaller-bugs
<syzkaller-bugs@googlegroups.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Ref Crashes Repro Title
> > <1> 5804 Yes kernel BUG in close_ctree
> > https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=2665d678fffcc4608e18
>
> I'm not sure why, but I never had a good experience reproducing the bug
> using the C reproduer.
>
> Furthermore, for this particular case, using that C reproducer only
> reduced tons of duplicated dmesg of:
>
> [ 162.264838] btrfs: Unknown parameter 'noinode_cache'
> [ 162.308573] loop0: detected capacity change from 0 to 32768
> [ 162.308964] btrfs: Unknown parameter 'noinode_cache'
> [ 162.313582] loop1: detected capacity change from 0 to 32768
> [ 162.314070] btrfs: Unknown parameter 'noinode_cache'
> [ 162.323629] loop3: detected capacity change from 0 to 32768
> [ 162.324000] btrfs: Unknown parameter 'noinode_cache'
> [ 162.328046] loop2: detected capacity change from 0 to 32768
> [ 162.328417] btrfs: Unknown parameter 'noinode_cache'
>
> Unlike the latest report which shows a lot of other things.
>
> Anyone can help verifying the C reproducer?
> Or I'm doing something wrong withe the reproducer?
>
> Thanks,
> Qu
> > <2> 2636 Yes WARNING in btrfs_space_info_update_bytes_may_use
> > https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=8edfa01e46fd9fe3fbfb
> > <3> 251 Yes INFO: task hung in lock_extent
> > https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=eaa05fbc7563874b7ad2
> > <4> 245 Yes WARNING in btrfs_chunk_alloc
> > https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=e8e56d5d31d38b5b47e7
> > <5> 224 Yes WARNING in btrfs_remove_chunk
> > https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=e8582cc16881ec70a430
> > <6> 125 Yes kernel BUG in insert_state_fast
> > https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=9ce4a36127ca92b59677
> > <7> 99 Yes kernel BUG in btrfs_free_tree_block
> > https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=a306f914b4d01b3958fe
> > <8> 88 Yes kernel BUG in set_state_bits
> > https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=b9d2e54d2301324657ed
> > <9> 79 Yes WARNING in btrfs_commit_transaction (2)
> > https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=dafbca0e20fbc5946925
> > <10> 74 Yes WARNING in btrfs_put_transaction
> > https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=3706b1df47f2464f0c1e
> >
> > ---
> > This report is generated by a bot. It may contain errors.
> > See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for more information about syzbot.
> > syzbot engineers can be reached at syzkaller@googlegroups.com.
> >
> > To disable reminders for individual bugs, reply with the following command:
> > #syz set <Ref> no-reminders
> >
> > To change bug's subsystems, reply with:
> > #syz set <Ref> subsystems: new-subsystem
> >
> > You may send multiple commands in a single email message.
> >
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2024-02-12 12:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-02-09 20:57 [syzbot] Monthly btrfs report (Feb 2024) syzbot
2024-02-10 8:48 ` Qu Wenruo
2024-02-12 12:15 ` Aleksandr Nogikh
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).