From: Chao Yu <chao2.yu@samsung.com>
To: jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com
Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
'谭姝' <shu.tan@samsung.com>
Subject: RE: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: check all ones or zeros bitmap with integer data type for better mount performance
Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2013 11:28:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <000101ced069$3d89fd40$b89df7c0$@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1382520734.992.78.camel@kjgkr>
Hi Kim,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2013 5:32 PM
> To: Chao Yu
> Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; '谭姝'
> Subject: RE: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: check all ones or zeros bitmap with integer
> data type for better mount performance
>
> Hi,
>
> 2013-10-23 (수), 11:23 +0800, Chao Yu:
> > Hi, Kim:
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Jaegeuk Kim [mailto:jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com]
> > > Sent: Tuesday, October 22, 2013 8:24 PM
> > > To: Chao Yu
> > > Cc: linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net;
> > > linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; 谭姝
> > > Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: check all ones or zeros bitmap
> > > with integer data type for better mount performance
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > 2013-10-22 (화), 17:28 +0800, Chao Yu:
> > > > Previously, check_block_count check valid_map with bit data type
> > > > in common scenario that sit has all ones or zeros bitmap, it makes
> > > > low mount performance.
> > > > So let's check the special bitmap with integer data type instead
> > > > of the bit one.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Tan Shu <shu.tan@samsung.com>
> > > > Signed-off-by: Yu Chao <chao2.yu@samsung.com>
> > > > ---
> > > > fs/f2fs/segment.h | 13 +++++++++++++
> > > > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/fs/f2fs/segment.h b/fs/f2fs/segment.h index
> > > > 7f94d78..d43ab9f 100644
> > > > --- a/fs/f2fs/segment.h
> > > > +++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.h
> > > > @@ -543,6 +543,7 @@ static inline void check_block_count(struct
> > > > f2fs_sb_info *sbi, {
> > > > struct f2fs_sm_info *sm_info = SM_I(sbi);
> > > > unsigned int end_segno = sm_info->segment_count - 1;
> > > > + int *valid_map = (int *)raw_sit->valid_map;
> > > > int valid_blocks = 0;
> > > > int i;
> > > >
> > > > @@ -552,6 +553,19 @@ static inline void check_block_count(struct
> > > > f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
> > > > /* check boundary of a given segment number */
> > > > BUG_ON(segno > end_segno);
> > > >
> > > > + /* check all ones or zeros valid_map */
> > > > + if (GET_SIT_VBLOCKS(raw_sit) == 0) {
> > > > + for (i = 0; i < SIT_VBLOCK_MAP_SIZE / sizeof(int); i++)
> > >
> > > We cannot guarantee all the time that SIT_VBLOCK_MAP_SIZE is
> > > multiple of sizeof(int).
> > Well, It's really large changes for f2fs if SIT_VBLOCK_MAP_SIZE value is being
> modified.
>
> But, it can be changed.
> Please do not add any unnecessary assumption.
Got it, sorry for the unmeaning assumption.
>
> >
> > > How about using memcmp() with __u8?
> > Do you mean that we can alloc all zeros or ones memory in
> > SIT_VBLOCK_MAP_SIZE size, then memcmp() it with sit bitmap by __u8?
>
> Yap.
> Ah, but there is another one.
> It would be better to use find_next_bit_le() and find_next_zero_bit_le().
> Any idea?
Good point.
I try to use memcmp(bitmap, bitmap+1, size-1) and bitmap[0],
But yours got better performance and readable.
Thanks.
>
> >
> > >
> > > > + if (unlikely(valid_map[i] != 0))
> > > > + BUG();
> > > > + return;
> > > > + } else if (GET_SIT_VBLOCKS(raw_sit) == sbi->blocks_per_seg) {
> > > > + for (i = 0; i < SIT_VBLOCK_MAP_SIZE / sizeof(int); i++)
> > > > + if (unlikely(valid_map[i] != -1))
> > > > + BUG();
> > > > + return;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > /* check bitmap with valid block count */
> > > > for (i = 0; i < sbi->blocks_per_seg; i++)
> > > > if (f2fs_test_bit(i, raw_sit->valid_map))
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
> > > > linux-fsdevel" in the body of a message to
> > > > majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at
> > > > http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jaegeuk Kim
> > > Samsung
> >
>
> --
> Jaegeuk Kim
> Samsung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-10-24 3:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-10-22 9:28 [f2fs-dev] [PATCH] f2fs: check all ones or zeros bitmap with integer data type for better mount performance Chao Yu
2013-10-22 12:23 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2013-10-23 3:23 ` [f2fs-dev] " Chao Yu
2013-10-23 9:32 ` Jaegeuk Kim
2013-10-24 3:28 ` Chao Yu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='000101ced069$3d89fd40$b89df7c0$@samsung.com' \
--to=chao2.yu@samsung.com \
--cc=jaegeuk.kim@samsung.com \
--cc=linux-f2fs-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shu.tan@samsung.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).