From: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@samsung.com>
To: 'Brian Foster' <bfoster@redhat.com>
Cc: 'Dave Chinner' <david@fromorbit.com>,
'Theodore Ts'o' <tytso@mit.edu>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
'linux-ext4' <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org>,
xfs@oss.sgi.com, 'Ashish Sangwan' <a.sangwan@samsung.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v7 11/11] xfstests: fsx: Add fallocate insert range operation
Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2015 14:48:57 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <001901d02a3d$a10cd9d0$e3268d70$@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150106181323.GI5874@bfoster.bfoster>
> > }
> > break;
> > + case OP_INSERT_RANGE:
> > + if (!insert_range_calls) {
> > + log4(OP_SKIPPED, OP_INSERT_RANGE, offset, size);
> > + goto out;
> > + }
> > + break;
> > }
> >
> > switch (op) {
> > @@ -1244,6 +1313,21 @@ test(void)
> > }
> > do_collapse_range(offset, size);
> > break;
> > + case OP_INSERT_RANGE:
> > + TRIM_OFF_LEN(offset, size, (maxfilelen - 1) - file_size);
>
> I see a ton of "skipping insert beyond EOF" messages when I run fsx with
> this patch that boil down to that we trim against the max allowable file
> size increase rather than the current file size. I suspect the intent
> here is to not limit the insert length based on the file size. That
> makes sense, but that causes us to fail to mod the insert offset against
> the file size and thus generate a ton more noise.
>
> Could we either open code the trim to handle the offset/len correctly or
> break up the macro in a way that facilitates doing so? For example, a
> quick solution might be to create TRIM_OFF() and TRIM_LEN() based on the
> associated code in TRIM_OFF_LEN(), redefine TRIM_OFF_LEN() to use the
> new macros, and then the insert range code could do something like:
>
> TRIM_OFF(offset, file_size - 1);
> TRIM_LEN(offset, size, maxfilelen - file_size);
> ...
>
Okay, I will change it as your suggestion.
> Brian
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-01-07 5:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-01-02 9:43 [PATCH v7 11/11] xfstests: fsx: Add fallocate insert range operation Namjae Jeon
2015-01-06 18:13 ` Brian Foster
2015-01-07 5:48 ` Namjae Jeon [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='001901d02a3d$a10cd9d0$e3268d70$@samsung.com' \
--to=namjae.jeon@samsung.com \
--cc=a.sangwan@samsung.com \
--cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tytso@mit.edu \
--cc=xfs@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).