public inbox for linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Joseph D. Wagner" <theman@josephdwagner.info>
To: <manningc2@actrix.gen.nz>,
	"'Warren W. Gay VE3WWG'" <ve3wwg@cogeco.ca>,
	<linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: Contraversial: A New FRUGAL File System? Linux Registry (again)?
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 01:10:19 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <003901c39c59$6248dab0$0201a8c0@joe> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20031027063015.98B1332C6D@desire.actrix.co.nz>

I concur with Charles Manning [manningc2@actrix.gen.nz] that the registry is a good idea and would be valuable to Linux, and I unfortunately agree that the registry is too often abused.

I must admit, though, that the idea of using a file system rather than a database as a registry is rather intriguing.  Instead of creating a whole new API for a registry, you can simply use the existing VFS API and treat each file as a registry entry.  However, Access Control Lists (ACL's) would be a must-have before such a file system registry is implemented or else both programs and users alike would surely abuse the registry.

Personally, I think a registry on Linux should be held off until Linux has native support for ACL's.  Trying to build a secure registry based upon the existing file system security architecture (read, write, execute; owner, group, everyone) would simply be too much of a hassle.

Joseph Wagner

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Charles Manning [mailto:manningc2@actrix.gen.nz]
> Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 12:36 AM
> To: Warren W. Gay VE3WWG; linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: Contraversial: A New FRUGAL File System? Linux Registry
> (again)?
> 
> Warren
> 
> I deal with various embedded systems, including Windows CE.
> 
> Of the few OS concepts carried over from Windows to WinCE, the registry is
> one.
> 
> I can see some merit to the concept of a registry, in theory, in that it
> makes a single configuration system in a single place. This makes
> administration and configuration a bit simpler. However, the concept of a
> single config point is very challenging when one deals with booting etc.
> Windows CE has serious pain there since you need the registry to boot, but
> where do you store the damn thing? WinCE now supports split registries to
> address this.
> 
> The Windows registry gets seriously abused too. I've seen it used for
> everything from inter-process communications to implementing error logs
> etc.
> 
> When it comes to newbie users, I don't think they really get any benefit
> from
> using a registry. How many Windows users use regedit or know there's a
> registry? Nope, they use the service's cute GUI config front-end.  Same
> for
> your softer Linux user - they just use the GUI sysadm tools and don't have
> to
> worry where the configs are.
> 
> Independently of registries, I think the concept of a frugal fs is a good
> one
> and likely to be of use to the embedded folk.
> 
> -- CHarles
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel"
> in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



  reply	other threads:[~2003-10-27  7:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-10-27  0:14 Contraversial: A New FRUGAL File System? Linux Registry (again)? Warren W. Gay VE3WWG
2003-10-27  6:36 ` Charles Manning
2003-10-27  7:10   ` Joseph D. Wagner [this message]
2003-10-27  7:26     ` Charles Manning
2003-10-27  7:44       ` Joseph D. Wagner
2003-10-28  3:51       ` Warren W. Gay VE3WWG
2003-10-28  3:49     ` Warren W. Gay VE3WWG
2003-10-28  3:05   ` Warren W. Gay VE3WWG
2003-10-27 17:41 ` Controversial: " Bryan Henderson
2003-10-28  3:31   ` Warren W. Gay VE3WWG
2003-10-28 13:08     ` Ingo Oeser
2003-10-28 13:12       ` Matthew Wilcox
2003-10-28 16:06       ` Ian Kent
2003-10-28 19:18     ` Bryan Henderson
2003-10-29 19:10       ` Brian Beattie
     [not found] <200310271438.19111.ioe-lkml@rameria.de>
2003-10-27 17:43 ` Contraversial: " Joseph D. Wagner
2003-10-27 23:01   ` David Woodhouse

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='003901c39c59$6248dab0$0201a8c0@joe' \
    --to=theman@josephdwagner.info \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=manningc2@actrix.gen.nz \
    --cc=ve3wwg@cogeco.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox