From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Joseph D. Wagner" Subject: RE: Contraversial: A New FRUGAL File System? Linux Registry (again)? Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 01:44:00 -0600 Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: <004d01c39c5e$16659200$0201a8c0@joe> References: <20031027071956.98995719C@blood.actrix.co.nz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Return-path: Received: from ssa8.serverconfig.com ([209.51.129.179]:22426 "EHLO ssa8.serverconfig.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261276AbTJ0HoC convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Oct 2003 02:44:02 -0500 To: , "'Warren W. Gay VE3WWG'" , In-Reply-To: <20031027071956.98995719C@blood.actrix.co.nz> List-Id: linux-fsdevel.vger.kernel.org Our disagreement is moot because I'm not even going to look at the idea now. I'm waiting for native ACL (Access Control List) support. > -----Original Message----- > From: Charles Manning [mailto:manningc2@actrix.gen.nz] > Sent: Monday, October 27, 2003 1:26 AM > To: Joseph D. Wagner; 'Warren W. Gay VE3WWG'; linux- > fsdevel@vger.kernel.org > Subject: Re: Contraversial: A New FRUGAL File System? Linux Registry > (again)? > > On Monday 27 October 2003 20:10, Joseph D. Wagner wrote: > > I concur with Charles Manning [manningc2@actrix.gen.nz] that the > registry > > is a good idea and would be valuable to Linux, and I unfortunately agree > > that the registry is too often abused. > > Hang on Joseph! I said I thought that the idea had merit **in theory**. In > practice I'm not sure that the registry is such a fantastic idea. > > I think though that a frugal file system could have some uses independent > of > the registry concept. > > -- CHarles