From: Sean Anderson <seanga2@gmail.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net
Subject: [PATCH v2] Documentation: filesystems: update filesystem locking documentation
Date: Tue, 1 Aug 2017 07:09:10 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <039038a9-ff79-a6fc-fd98-b0d8abd702d1@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170731172359.GJ15980@bombadil.infradead.org>
[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3586 bytes --]
Documentation/filesystems/Locking no longer reflects current locking
semantics. i_mutex is no longer used for locking, and has been superseded
by i_rwsem. Additionally, ->iterate_shared() was not documented.
Signed-off-by: Sean Anderson <seanga2@gmail.com>
---
v2: changed 'yes's to 'exclusive's when describing i_rwsem usage
Documentation/filesystems/Locking | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
1 file changed, 24 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/filesystems/Locking b/Documentation/filesystems/Locking
index fe25787ff6d4..c0cab97d2b1a 100644
--- a/Documentation/filesystems/Locking
+++ b/Documentation/filesystems/Locking
@@ -69,31 +69,31 @@ prototypes:
locking rules:
all may block
- i_mutex(inode)
-lookup: yes
-create: yes
-link: yes (both)
-mknod: yes
-symlink: yes
-mkdir: yes
-unlink: yes (both)
-rmdir: yes (both) (see below)
-rename: yes (all) (see below)
+ i_rwsem(inode)
+lookup: shared
+create: exclusive
+link: exclusive (both)
+mknod: exclusive
+symlink: exclusive
+mkdir: exclusive
+unlink: exclusive (both)
+rmdir: exclusive (both)(see below)
+rename: exclusive (all) (see below)
readlink: no
get_link: no
-setattr: yes
+setattr: exclusive
permission: no (may not block if called in rcu-walk mode)
get_acl: no
getattr: no
listxattr: no
fiemap: no
update_time: no
-atomic_open: yes
+atomic_open: exclusive
tmpfile: no
- Additionally, ->rmdir(), ->unlink() and ->rename() have ->i_mutex on
-victim.
+ Additionally, ->rmdir(), ->unlink() and ->rename() have ->i_rwsem
+ exclusive on victim.
cross-directory ->rename() has (per-superblock) ->s_vfs_rename_sem.
See Documentation/filesystems/directory-locking for more detailed discussion
@@ -111,10 +111,10 @@ prototypes:
locking rules:
all may block
- i_mutex(inode)
+ i_rwsem(inode)
list: no
get: no
-set: yes
+set: exclusive
--------------------------- super_operations ---------------------------
prototypes:
@@ -217,14 +217,14 @@ prototypes:
locking rules:
All except set_page_dirty and freepage may block
- PageLocked(page) i_mutex
+ PageLocked(page) i_rwsem
writepage: yes, unlocks (see below)
readpage: yes, unlocks
writepages:
set_page_dirty no
readpages:
-write_begin: locks the page yes
-write_end: yes, unlocks yes
+write_begin: locks the page exclusive
+write_end: yes, unlocks exclusive
bmap:
invalidatepage: yes
releasepage: yes
@@ -439,6 +439,7 @@ prototypes:
ssize_t (*read_iter) (struct kiocb *, struct iov_iter *);
ssize_t (*write_iter) (struct kiocb *, struct iov_iter *);
int (*iterate) (struct file *, struct dir_context *);
+ int (*iterate_shared) (struct file *, struct dir_context *);
unsigned int (*poll) (struct file *, struct poll_table_struct *);
long (*unlocked_ioctl) (struct file *, unsigned int, unsigned long);
long (*compat_ioctl) (struct file *, unsigned int, unsigned long);
@@ -480,6 +481,10 @@ mutex or just to use i_size_read() instead.
Note: this does not protect the file->f_pos against concurrent modifications
since this is something the userspace has to take care about.
+->iterate() is called with i_rwsem exclusive.
+
+->iterate_shared() is called with i_rwsem at least shared.
+
->fasync() is responsible for maintaining the FASYNC bit in filp->f_flags.
Most instances call fasync_helper(), which does that maintenance, so it's
not normally something one needs to worry about. Return values > 0 will be
--
2.13.2
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 618 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-08-01 11:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-31 15:53 [PATCH] Documentation: filesystems: update filesystem locking documentation Sean Anderson
2017-07-31 17:23 ` Matthew Wilcox
2017-08-01 11:09 ` Sean Anderson [this message]
2017-08-01 11:15 ` [PATCH v2] " Jeff Layton
2017-08-01 14:22 ` Jonathan Corbet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=039038a9-ff79-a6fc-fd98-b0d8abd702d1@gmail.com \
--to=seanga2@gmail.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).