From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 359EB6518E for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2024 02:13:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710814412; cv=none; b=jwoYSWnd+Oa1Yj1A/9m+2DEVXiat+1uuQ+/WPl+LXaOx99ORpGYU/Sr7s71s32gwrWS9mdwEtP0RSMEXPp4Er7R5xcweQ35Qvib+p6bO2FTruUBJFuQAERdEFc5pKWNtIf85PE2gBZNsn/qXmc3d57jVKkPFr340RvPp3Ep87WA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710814412; c=relaxed/simple; bh=HgXqsL6bokae77+3qonV1fTiuEm5+WKxKPmzpTF7UQc=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=poAEXn6XUMNmd0uwH0W3JD6so8a2kKe+WCmTuIBzGbsbd8HaLEScNC+YoFLTn0PP7xk0Bk+Z0+ga58902YRzxSdm4Vcn8DLasHh6UmEAQmYDMFrYrSkdNON7o800+9QEdDXdlqmM84YS1zT3B7Mn0duqSLv/DMc9hsGhGUwuc8Q= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b=dclSv7M4; arc=none smtp.client-ip=170.10.129.124 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="dclSv7M4" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1710814410; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=PR2W7QxFvFoQlpFb6TU+oTBxoI64ohRIcsZtQ1vS4u0=; b=dclSv7M4P6H+TjkYIV4eF+zKpeTHDYzCHHOknIKpBoSMQrTtl5uKt2+tZpRXRcxxExmIU8 cajmM1k73pBaE5UmRQyE6vnAVerZvXIAGxqhLJ+6SURA6kWZLJvOIJbWo6PmC23z4aYCsF GI7Mzam1SIOpwiBNFzqBQtlzkd9Pimg= Received: from mail-qk1-f200.google.com (mail-qk1-f200.google.com [209.85.222.200]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-231-rDHzkUEqO8yz-aAVUD5oXQ-1; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 22:13:25 -0400 X-MC-Unique: rDHzkUEqO8yz-aAVUD5oXQ-1 Received: by mail-qk1-f200.google.com with SMTP id af79cd13be357-78a09c0a053so108232585a.2 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 19:13:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1710814405; x=1711419205; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:from:references:cc:to :content-language:subject:user-agent:mime-version:date:message-id :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=PR2W7QxFvFoQlpFb6TU+oTBxoI64ohRIcsZtQ1vS4u0=; b=wmBM3SL70fgoqzKwJ74MgctMM0e63xKghEmP37Ji7NMKc4AsL5Y5rZxsbK+BzTpiPL nhv2mS+bVRv27WJKBvHDd/9Q9kYyN+qUlEOUwNVUOY+aEUUfWAiKRW+gUDAy42Gq6MdV 8D68ixWARh+6Yuvo0yo0TSYzgXIxECCcwJpm17NRyanwATAh1GuAw2xmBIhh+oCykZOM K4482vUEKP4rY4R0Q0oN8aTccwV05794zo9bEDrAHWlnHFK6Aonp8O3pCOArv2TJUPIL m4jZWyMFfT1FY7X4EjHDz0PHh3HbinTCFm04wyfS3vnGETd3DtqAG3l1AGFb3Ir0mHeO XWng== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCW/9n9BUoSwJlAAKcIH1xMqwc6jOZgnqV9xRcLs0b/IXefYOtLB7rAoxts5d8AfwmzCaqfkAUthwp2tYgsFGtsB/jUHB0m9CHo3J+vZuw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwY0jsJtazTqdgchXsxdm3GeCT5xIG1zijEWX3QjTw/osGfttsy TXP3Rxle9wViLQD63MSaXzmT1H+IovcWPH3zYMDN1Ri41thshJfHAXNRDmT8IV2MsRxJduwcMmK /eSK1HharaPZQVuPfilVxXjzH1m+lVomYELm5QEcpZtg0yVAqoOqj72BL01Flqe4= X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:ec1:b0:788:2b1c:1e57 with SMTP id x1-20020a05620a0ec100b007882b1c1e57mr14376431qkm.55.1710814405020; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 19:13:25 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IH6IVS25Egeb7ZU7Mkj2+mrhK7KiNxctSo4ouA/lQ06ajNkcRwpZqlTTzOThSCjm79dmZhgIw== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:ec1:b0:788:2b1c:1e57 with SMTP id x1-20020a05620a0ec100b007882b1c1e57mr14376420qkm.55.1710814404762; Mon, 18 Mar 2024 19:13:24 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.163] ([70.22.187.239]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 20-20020a05620a04d400b007885e3275e9sm5007287qks.132.2024.03.18.19.13.23 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 18 Mar 2024 19:13:24 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <0665f6a6-39d9-e730-9403-0348c181dd55@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2024 22:13:23 -0400 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.12.0 Subject: Re: [RFC v4 linux-next 00/19] fs & block: remove bdev->bd_inode Content-Language: en-US To: Yu Kuai , Christian Brauner Cc: jack@suse.cz, hch@lst.de, axboe@kernel.dk, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, yi.zhang@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com, "yukuai (C)" , dm-devel@lists.linux.dev References: <20240222124555.2049140-1-yukuai1@huaweicloud.com> <1324ffb5-28b6-34fb-014e-3f57df714095@huawei.com> <20240315-assoziieren-hacken-b43f24f78970@brauner> <20240318-mythisch-pittoresk-1c57af743061@brauner> From: Matthew Sakai In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 3/18/24 21:43, Yu Kuai wrote: > Hi, > > 在 2024/03/19 9:18, Yu Kuai 写道: >> Hi, >> >> 在 2024/03/18 17:39, Christian Brauner 写道: >>> On Sat, Mar 16, 2024 at 10:49:33AM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote: >>>> Hi, Christian >>>> >>>> 在 2024/03/15 21:54, Christian Brauner 写道: >>>>> On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 08:08:49PM +0800, Yu Kuai wrote: >>>>>> Hi, Christian >>>>>> Hi, Christoph >>>>>> Hi, Jan >>>>>> >>>>>> Perhaps now is a good time to send a formal version of this set. >>>>>> However, I'm not sure yet what branch should I rebase and send >>>>>> this set. >>>>>> Should I send to the vfs tree? >>>>> >>>>> Nearly all of it is in fs/ so I'd say yes. >>>>> . >>>> >>>> I see that you just create a new branch vfs.fixes, perhaps can I rebase >>>> this set against this branch? >>> >>> Please base it on vfs.super. I'll rebase it to v6.9-rc1 on Sunday. >> >> Okay, I just see that vfs.super doesn't contain commit >> 1cdeac6da33f("btrfs: pass btrfs_device to btrfs_scratch_superblocks()"), >> and you might need to fix the conflict at some point. > > And there is another problem, dm-vdo doesn't exist in vfs.super yet. Do > you still want me to rebase here? > The dm-vdo changes don't appear to rely on earlier patches in the series, so I think dm-vdo could incorporate the dm-vdo patch independently from the rest of the series, if that would be helpful. (I don't want to confuse things too much.) In that case it would go through the dm tree with the rest of dm-vdo. Matt