From: Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Josef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>,
Lennart Poettering <lennart@poettering.net>,
Daan De Meyer <daan.j.demeyer@gmail.com>,
Seth Forshee <sforshee@kernel.org>,
Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] statmount: allow to retrieve idmappings
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2025 07:22:42 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <09e3c398d484de2721ac00b7fa2d0026062f7c0c.camel@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250130-work-mnt_idmap-statmount-v1-0-d4ced5874e14@kernel.org>
On Thu, 2025-01-30 at 00:19 +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
> This adds the STATMOUNT_MNT_UIDMAP and STATMOUNT_MNT_GIDMAP options.
> It allows the retrieval of idmappings via statmount().
>
> Currently it isn't possible to figure out what idmappings are applied to
> an idmapped mount. This information is often crucial. Before statmount()
> the only realistic options for an interface like this would have been to
> add it to /proc/<pid>/fdinfo/<nr> or to expose it in
> /proc/<pid>/mountinfo. Both solution would have been pretty ugly and
> would've shown information that is of strong interest to some
> application but not all. statmount() is perfect for this.
>
> The idmappings applied to an idmapped mount are shown relative to the
> caller's user namespace. This is the most useful solution that doesn't
> risk leaking information or confuse the caller.
>
> For example, an idmapped mount might have been created with the
> following idmappings:
>
> mount --bind -o X-mount.idmap="0:10000:1000 2000:2000:1 3000:3000:1" /srv /opt
>
> Listing the idmappings through statmount() in the same context shows:
>
> mnt_id: 2147485088
> mnt_parent_id: 2147484816
> fs_type: btrfs
> mnt_root: /srv
> mnt_point: /opt
> mnt_opts: ssd,discard=async,space_cache=v2,subvolid=5,subvol=/
> mnt_uidmap[0]: 0 10000 1000
> mnt_uidmap[1]: 2000 2000 1
> mnt_uidmap[2]: 3000 3000 1
> mnt_gidmap[0]: 0 10000 1000
> mnt_gidmap[1]: 2000 2000 1
> mnt_gidmap[2]: 3000 3000 1
>
nit: any reason not to separate the fields with ':' like the mount
option syntax?
> But the idmappings might not always be resolvablein the caller's user
> namespace. For example:
>
> unshare --user --map-root
>
> In this case statmount() will indicate the failure to resolve the idmappings
> in the caller's user namespace by listing 4294967295 aka (uid_t) -1 as
> the target of the mapping while still showing the source and range of
> the mapping:
>
> mnt_id: 2147485087
> mnt_parent_id: 2147484016
> fs_type: btrfs
> mnt_root: /srv
> mnt_point: /opt
> mnt_opts: ssd,discard=async,space_cache=v2,subvolid=5,subvol=/
> mnt_uidmap[0]: 0 4294967295 1000
> mnt_uidmap[1]: 2000 4294967295 1
> mnt_uidmap[2]: 3000 4294967295 1
> mnt_gidmap[0]: 0 4294967295 1000
> mnt_gidmap[1]: 2000 4294967295 1
> mnt_gidmap[2]: 3000 4294967295 1
>
From a UI standpoint, this behavior is pretty ugly. What if we
(hypothetically) move to 64-bit uids one day? Maybe it'd be better to
note an inability to resolve with more distinct output? Like a '?'
instead of a -1 cast to unsigned?
If I can't resolve the range, maybe it'd be better to just not return
the info at all? Are the first and third fields of any value without
the second?
> Note that statmount() requires that the whole range must be resolvable
> in the caller's user namespace. If a subrange fails to map it will still
> list the map as not resolvable. This is a practical compromise to avoid
> having to find which subranges are resovable and wich aren't.
>
> Idmappings are listed as a string array with each mapping separated by
> zero bytes. This allows to retrieve the idmappings and immediately use
> them for writing to e.g., /proc/<pid>/{g,u}id_map and it also allow for
> simple iteration like:
>
> if (stmnt->mask & STATMOUNT_MNT_UIDMAP) {
> const char *idmap = stmnt->str + stmnt->mnt_uidmap;
>
> for (size_t idx = 0; idx < stmnt->mnt_uidmap_nr; idx++) {
> printf("mnt_uidmap[%lu]: %s\n", idx, idmap);
> idmap += strlen(idmap) + 1;
> }
> }
>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
> ---
> Christian Brauner (4):
> uidgid: add map_id_range_up()
> statmount: allow to retrieve idmappings
> samples/vfs: check whether flag was raised
> samples/vfs: add STATMOUNT_MNT_{G,U}IDMAP
>
> fs/internal.h | 1 +
> fs/mnt_idmapping.c | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> fs/namespace.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> include/linux/uidgid.h | 6 +++++
> include/uapi/linux/mount.h | 8 ++++++-
> kernel/user_namespace.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------
> samples/vfs/samples-vfs.h | 14 ++++++++++-
> samples/vfs/test-list-all-mounts.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> 8 files changed, 164 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> ---
> base-commit: 6d61a53dd6f55405ebcaea6ee38d1ab5a8856c2c
> change-id: 20250129-work-mnt_idmap-statmount-e57f258fef8e
>
--
Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-30 12:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-29 23:19 [PATCH 0/4] statmount: allow to retrieve idmappings Christian Brauner
2025-01-29 23:19 ` [PATCH 1/4] uidgid: add map_id_range_up() Christian Brauner
2025-01-29 23:19 ` [PATCH 2/4] statmount: allow to retrieve idmappings Christian Brauner
2025-01-30 12:37 ` Jeff Layton
2025-01-29 23:19 ` [PATCH 3/4] samples/vfs: check whether flag was raised Christian Brauner
2025-01-30 8:45 ` Miklos Szeredi
2025-01-30 15:17 ` Christian Brauner
2025-01-29 23:19 ` [PATCH 4/4] samples/vfs: add STATMOUNT_MNT_{G,U}IDMAP Christian Brauner
2025-01-30 12:22 ` Jeff Layton [this message]
2025-01-30 15:16 ` [PATCH 0/4] statmount: allow to retrieve idmappings Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=09e3c398d484de2721ac00b7fa2d0026062f7c0c.camel@kernel.org \
--to=jlayton@kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=daan.j.demeyer@gmail.com \
--cc=josef@toxicpanda.com \
--cc=lennart@poettering.net \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=sforshee@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox