From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Liz Fong-Jones <lizf@honeycomb.io>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@linux.dev>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeel.butt@linux.dev>,
Xin Yin <yinxin.x@bytedance.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
cgroups@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
ian@honeycomb.io
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] writeback: switch a replaced cgwb's inodes to its successor
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 09:05:38 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0bc5d58533f10b4841807be3025daa11@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261002-wb-dying-cgwb-flush-v6-3-1991b4e2dcff@honeycomb.io>
Hello, Liz.
The following is a Claude-generated review.
On Fri, Oct 02, 2026 at 09:40:48PM +0000, Liz Fong-Jones wrote:
> + * Switch all inodes attached to @wb, dirty or not, to the wb that foreign
> + * flushes now find for @wb's memcg. If that one is already gone, fall back
The scan only reaches inodes on @wb's lists, so any inode attached to @wb
but on none of them stays behind, not just one from the
__inode_attach_wb() race. A clean inode switched over from the root wb,
which keeps clean inodes off its lists, is one example. Maybe say "all
inodes on @wb's lists" here and broaden that sentence in the description?
> + spin_lock(&wb->list_lock);
> + restart = isw_prepare_wbs_switch(new_wb, isw, &wb->b_attached, &nr) ||
> + isw_prepare_wbs_switch(new_wb, isw, &wb->b_dirty, &nr) ||
> + isw_prepare_wbs_switch(new_wb, isw, &wb->b_io, &nr) ||
> + isw_prepare_wbs_switch(new_wb, isw, &wb->b_more_io, &nr) ||
> + isw_prepare_wbs_switch(new_wb, isw, &wb->b_dirty_time, &nr);
> + spin_unlock(&wb->list_lock);
With f6988c90671e ("writeback: bound cleanup_offline_cgwb() rescans by
rotating scanned inodes") on mainline, isw_prepare_wbs_switch() moves
every scanned inode to the newest end of the list, and wb_switch_rwsem
keeps switches from landing during a sync but doesn't cover this scan.
On b_dirty, that can make a sync miss data:
1. A background work on the replaced wb yields to a sync_inodes_sb()
work and leaves inodes on b_io.
2. The sync work fixes dirtied_before at entry but doesn't queue_io()
until b_io drains.
3. Meanwhile, the memcg dirties a clean inode, which goes to the head of
b_dirty.
4. This scan fills an isw from the tail of b_dirty and moves those older
inodes in front of the new one.
5. Their switches block on wb_switch_rwsem, which the sync holds for
write.
6. queue_io() stops at the new inode, so the older ones, dirtied before
the sync started, are still dirty when it returns.
Maybe hold wb_switch_rwsem for read across the scan?
> +/* called with cgwb_lock held, possibly with interrupts disabled */
cgwb_lock is always taken with irqs disabled and lockdep_assert_held()
already says the rest. Maybe drop the comment?
> + * cgwb_kick_replaced - switch inodes away from @wb again if it was replaced
This queues replaced_work rather than switching anything. Maybe "queue
@wb's replaced_work if @wb has been replaced"?
Thanks.
--
tejun
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-14 19:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-02 21:40 [PATCH v6 0/3] writeback: let foreign flushes reach dying cgwbs Liz Fong-Jones
2026-10-02 21:40 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] writeback: clear the old wb's dirty IO state after switching inodes Liz Fong-Jones
2026-10-14 7:35 ` Jan Kara
2026-10-02 21:40 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] writeback: let foreign flushes reach dying cgwbs Liz Fong-Jones
2026-10-14 7:50 ` Jan Kara
2026-10-02 21:40 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] writeback: switch a replaced cgwb's inodes to its successor Liz Fong-Jones
2026-10-14 11:21 ` Jan Kara
2026-10-14 19:05 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2026-10-15 11:45 ` Liz Fong-Jones
2026-10-13 13:34 ` [PATCH v6 0/3] writeback: let foreign flushes reach dying cgwbs Liz Fong-Jones
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0bc5d58533f10b4841807be3025daa11@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=cgroups@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=ian@honeycomb.io \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lizf@honeycomb.io \
--cc=roman.gushchin@linux.dev \
--cc=shakeel.butt@linux.dev \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=yinxin.x@bytedance.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox