From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3DB9C43381 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 15:32:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFBC520811 for ; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 15:32:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727373AbfCSPct (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Mar 2019 11:32:49 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:40594 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726926AbfCSPct (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Mar 2019 11:32:49 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 777C7AFF0; Tue, 19 Mar 2019 15:32:47 +0000 (UTC) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2019 16:32:45 +0100 From: Roman Penyaev To: Peng Wang Cc: viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/epoll: remove an unnecessary argument of ep_busy_loop() In-Reply-To: <20190308081420.18719-1-rocking@whu.edu.cn> References: <20190308081420.18719-1-rocking@whu.edu.cn> Message-ID: <0f9b082b663fd9988436cec2196efb11@suse.de> X-Sender: rpenyaev@suse.de User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org On 2019-03-08 09:14, Peng Wang wrote: > When ep_busy_loop() is called, timed_out is always zero, > otherwise ep_poll() would return first. Yes, that's correct. Reviewed-by: Roman Penyaev