From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Csaba Henk Subject: Re: [PATCH] fuse: cache invalidation calls Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 11:32:32 +0200 Message-ID: <100d90a90906040232ofd2b5ebw8c8d5f677b13e840@mail.gmail.com> References: <1119562997.1044731244033504415.JavaMail.root@mb1> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: avati@gluster.com, muirj@nortel.com, fuse-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, dl-hacking@gluster.com To: Miklos Szeredi Return-path: Received: from mail-fx0-f213.google.com ([209.85.220.213]:49883 "EHLO mail-fx0-f213.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750885AbZFDJcc convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 4 Jun 2009 05:32:32 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Miklos Szeredi wro= te: > On Wed, 3 Jun 2009, Anand Avati wrote: >> I was wondering how the userland libfuse would be made aware of the >> presence of these two notification features? > > Here's a patch against fuse CVS. =A0It's also from John Muir. In fact, what we were meditating about is the lack of the =46USE_KERNEL_MINOR_VERSION bump. Without that, how do the two parties negotiate if the rev inval messages are understood? One of John's patches in his patchset had it bumped though... Csaba -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-fsdevel= " in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html